179 research outputs found

    The effect of AGN feedback on the halo mass function

    Full text link
    [Abridged.] We investigate baryon effects on the halo mass function (HMF), with emphasis on the role played by AGN feedback. Halos are identified with both Friends-of-Friends (FoF) and Spherical Overdensity (SO) algorithms. We embed the standard SO algorithm into a memory-controlled frame program and present the {\bf P}ython spher{\bf I}c{\bf A}l {\bf O}verdensity code --- {\small PIAO}. For both FoF and SO halos, the effect of AGN feedback is that of suppressing the HMFs to a level even below that of Dark Matter simulations. The ratio between the HMFs in the AGN and in the DM simulations is ∼0.8\sim 0.8 at overdensity Δc=500\Delta_c=500, a difference that increases at higher overdensity Δc=2500\Delta_c=2500, with no significant redshift and mass dependence. A decrease of the halo masses ratio with respect to the DM case induces the decrease of the HMF in the AGN simulation. The shallower inner density profiles of halos in the AGN simulation witnesses that mass reduction is induced by the sudden displacement of gas induced by thermal AGN feedback. We provide fitting functions to describe halo mass variations at different overdensities, which can recover the HMFs with a residual random scatter <5\lt 5 per cent for halo masses larger than 1013 h−1M⊙10^{13} ~h^{-1}{\rm M_\odot}.Comment: 16 pages, 11 figures. Matches to MNRAS published version, typo corrected in the fitting functio

    Nonlinearities in modified gravity cosmology. II. Impacts of modified gravity on the halo properties

    Full text link
    The statistics of dark matter halos is an essential component of understanding the nonlinear evolution in modified gravity cosmology. Based on a series of modified gravity N-body simulations, we investigate the halo mass function, concentration and bias. We model the impact of modified gravity by a single parameter \zeta, which determines the enhancement of particle acceleration with respect to GR, given the identical mass distribution (\zeta=1 in GR). We select snapshot redshifts such that the linear matter power spectra of different gravity models are identical, in order to isolate the impact of gravity beyond modifying the linear growth rate. At the baseline redshift corresponding to z_S=1.2 in the standard \Lambda CDM, for a 10% deviation from GR(|\zeta-1|=0.1), the measured halo mass function can differ by about 5-10%, the halo concentration by about 10-20%, while the halo bias differs significantly less. These results demonstrate that the halo mass function and/or the halo concentration are sensitive to the nature of gravity and may be used to make interesting constraints along this line.Comment: 8 pages, 7 figures, accepted for publication in Physical Review

    The source-lens clustering effect in the context of lensing tomography and its self-calibration

    Full text link
    Cosmic shear can only be measured where there are galaxies. This source-lens clustering (SLC) effect has two sources, intrinsic source clustering and cosmic magnification (magnification/size bias). Lensing tomography can suppress the former. However, this reduction is limited by the existence of photo-z error and nonzero redshift bin width. Furthermore, SLC induced by cosmic magnification cannot be reduced by lensing tomography. Through N-body simulations, we quantify the impact of SLC on the lensing power spectrum in the context of lensing tomography. We consider both the standard estimator and the pixel-based estimator. We find that none of them can satisfactorily handle both sources of SLC. (1) For the standard estimator, SLC induced by both sources can bias the lensing power spectrum by O(1)-O(10)%. Intrinsic source clustering also increases statistical uncertainties in the measured lensing power spectrum. However, the standard estimator suppresses intrinsic source clustering in the cross-spectrum. (2) In contrast, the pixel-based estimator suppresses SLC through cosmic magnification. However, it fails to suppress SLC through intrinsic source clustering and the measured lensing power spectrum can be biased low by O(1)-O(10)%. In short, for typical photo-z errors (sigma_z/(1+z)=0.05) and photo-z bin sizes (Delta_z^P=0.2), SLC alters the lensing E-mode power spectrum by 1-10%, with ell~10^3$ and z_s~1 being of particular interest to weak lensing cosmology. Therefore the SLC is a severe systematic for cosmology in Stage-IV lensing surveys. We present useful scaling relations to self-calibrate the SLC effect.Comment: 13 pages, 10 figures, Accepted by AP

    The Impact of Baryons on the Large-Scale Structure of the Universe

    Get PDF
    Numerical simulations play an important role in current astronomy researches. Previous dark-matter-only simulations have represented the large-scale structure of the Universe. However, nowadays, hydro-dynamical simulations with baryonic models, which can directly present realistic galaxies, may twist these results from dark-matter-only simulations. In this chapter, we mainly focus on these three statistical methods: power spectrum, two-point correlation function and halo mass function, which are normally used to characterize the large-scale structure of the Universe. We review how these baryon processes influence the cosmology structures from very large scale to quasi-linear and non-linear scales by comparing dark-matter-only simulations with their hydro-dynamical counterparts. At last, we make a brief discussion on the impacts coming from different baryon models and simulation codes

    Gaussianizing the non-Gaussian lensing convergence field I: the performance of the Gaussianization

    Full text link
    Motivated by recent works of Neyrinck et al. 2009 and Scherrer et al. 2010, we proposed a Gaussianization transform to Gaussianize the non-Gaussian lensing convergence field κ\kappa. It performs a local monotonic transformation κ→y\kappa\rightarrow y pixel by pixel to make the unsmoothed one-point probability distribution function of the new variable yy Gaussian. We tested whether the whole yy field is Gaussian against N-body simulations. (1) We found that the proposed Gaussianization suppresses the non-Gaussianity by orders of magnitude, in measures of the skewness, the kurtosis, the 5th- and 6th-order cumulants of the yy field smoothed over various angular scales relative to that of the corresponding smoothed κ\kappa field. The residual non-Gaussianities are often consistent with zero within the statistical errors. (2) The Gaussianization significantly suppresses the bispectrum. Furthermore, the residual scatters around zero, depending on the configuration in the Fourier space. (3) The Gaussianization works with even better performance for the 2D fields of the matter density projected over \sim 300 \mpch distance interval centered at z∈(0,2)z\in(0,2), which can be reconstructed from the weak lensing tomography. (4) We identified imperfectness and complexities of the proposed Gaussianization. We noticed weak residual non-Gaussianity in the yy field. We verified the widely used logarithmic transformation as a good approximation to the Gaussianization transformation. However, we also found noticeable deviations.Comment: 13 pages, 15 figures, accepted by PR

    Brightest cluster galaxies in cosmological simulations: achievements and limitations of AGN feedback models

    Get PDF
    We analyze the basic properties of Brightest Cluster Galaxies (BCGs) produced by state of the art cosmological zoom-in hydrodynamical simulations. These simulations have been run with different sub-grid physics included. Here we focus on the results obtained with and without the inclusion of the prescriptions for supermassive black hole (SMBH) growth and of the ensuing Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) feedback. The latter process goes in the right direction of decreasing significantly the overall formation of stars. However, BCGs end up still containing too much stellar mass, a problem that increases with halo mass, and having an unsatisfactory structure. This is in the sense that their effective radii are too large, and that their density profiles feature a flattening on scales much larger than observed. We also find that our model of thermal AGN feedback has very little effect on the stellar velocity dispersions, which turn out to be very large. Taken together, these problems, which to some extent can be recognized also in other numerical studies typically dealing with smaller halo masses, indicate that on one hand present day sub-resolution models of AGN feedback are not effective enough in diminishing the global formation of stars in the most massive galaxies, but on the other hand they are relatively too effective in their centers. It is likely that a form of feedback generating large scale gas outflows from BCGs precursors, and a more widespread effect over the galaxy volume, can alleviate these difficulties.Comment: 17 pages, 14 figures, accepted for publication on MNRAS, comments welcom

    nIFTy galaxy cluster simulations - IV. Quantifying the influence of baryons on halo properties

    Get PDF
    Building on the initial results of the nIFTy simulated galaxy cluster comparison, we compare and contrast the impact of baryonic physics with a single massive galaxy cluster, run with 11 state-of-the-art codes, spanning adaptive mesh, moving mesh, classic and modern smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) approaches. For each code represented we have a dark-matter-only (DM) and non-radiative (NR) version of the cluster, as well as a full physics (FP) version for a subset of the codes. We compare both radial mass and kinematic profiles, as well as global measures of the cluster (e.g. concentration, spin, shape), in the NR and FP runs with that in the DM runs. Our analysis reveals good consistency ≲20 per cent) between global properties of the cluster predicted by different codes when integrated quantities are measured within the virial radius R200. However, we see larger differences for quantities within R2500, especially in the FP runs. The radial profiles reveal a diversity, especially in the cluster centre, between the NR runs, which can be understood straightforwardly from the division of codes into classic SPH and non-classic SPH (including the modern SPH, adaptive and moving mesh codes); and between the FP runs, which can also be understood broadly from the division of codes into those that include active galactic nucleus feedback and those that do not. The variation with respect to the median is much larger in the FP runs with different baryonic physics prescriptions than in the NR runs with different hydrodynamics solversThe authors would like to acknowledge the support of the International Centre for Radio Astronomy Research (ICRAR) node at the University of Western Australia (UWA) for the hosting of the ‘Perth Simulated Cluster Comparison’ workshop in 2015 March, the results of which has led to this work; the financial support of the UWA Research Collaboration Award (RCA) 2014 and 2015 schemes; the financial support of the Australian Research Council (ARC) Centre of Excellence for All Sky Astrophysics (CAASTRO) CE110001020; and ARC Discovery Projects DP130100117 and DP140100198. We would also like to thank the Instituto de Fisica Teorica (IFT-UAM/CSIC in Madrid) for its support, via the Centro de Excelencia Severo Ochoa Program under Grant No. SEV-2012-0249, during the three week workshop ‘nIFTy Cosmology’ in 2014, where the foundation for much of this work was established. WC acknowledges support from UWA RCAs PG12105017 and PG12105026, and from the Survey Simulation Pipeline (SSimPL; http://www.ssimpl.org/). CP is supported by an ARC Future Fellowship FT130100041 and ARC Discovery Projects DP130100117 and DP140100198. AK is supported by the Ministerio de Econom´ıa y Competitividad (MINECO) in Spain through grant AYA2012-31101 as well as the Consolider-Ingenio 2010 Programme of the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovaci´on (MICINN) under grant MultiDark CSD2009-00064. He also acknowledges support fromARCDiscovery Projects DP130100117 and DP140100198. He further thanks Dylan Mondegreen for something to dream on. PJE is supported by the SSimPL programme and the Sydney Institute for Astronomy (SIfA), and Australian Research Council (ARC) grants DP130100117 and DP140100198. GY and FS acknowledge support fromMINECO (Spain) through the grant AYA 2012-31101. GY thanks also the Red Espa˜nola de Supercomputacion for granting the computing time in the Marenostrum Supercomputer at BSC, where all theMUSIC simulations have been performed. GM acknowledges supports from the PRIN-MIUR 2012 Grant ‘The Evolution of Cosmic Baryons’ funded by the Italian Minister of University and Research, from the PRIN-INAF 2012 Grant ‘Multiscale Simulations of Cosmic Structures’ funded by the Consorzio per la Fisica di Trieste. AMB is supported by the DFG Cluster of Excellence ‘Universe’ and by the DFG Research Unit 1254 ‘Magnetisation of interstellar and intergalactic media’. CDV acknowledges support from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) through grants AYA2013- 46886 and AYA2014-58308. CDV also acknowledges financial support from MINECO under the 2011 Severo Ochoa Program MINECO SEV-2011-0187. EP acknowledges support by the Kavli foundation and the ERC grant ‘The Emergence of Structure during the epoch of Reionization’. RJT acknowledges support via a Discovery Grant from NSERC and the Canada Research Chairs programme. Simulations were run on the CFI-NSRIT funded Saint Mary’s Computational Astrophysics Laboratory. The authors contributed to this paper in the following ways:WC, CP, and AK formed the core team that organized and analysed the data, made the plots and wrote the paper. CP, WC, LO, AK, MK, FRP, and GY organized the nIFTy workshop at which this programme was completed. GY supplied the initial conditions. PJE assisted with the analysis. All the other authors, as listed in Section 2 performed the simulations using their codes. All authors read and comment on the paper. The simulation used for this paper has been run on Marenostrum supercomputer and is publicly available at the MUSIC website. The AREPO simulations were performed with resources awarded through STFCs DiRAC initiative. G3-SPHS sumulations were carried out using resources provided by the Pawsey Supercomputing Centre with funding from the Australian Government and the Government of Western Australia. G3-PESPH simulations were carried out using resources at the Center for High Performance Computing in Cape Town, South Africa. G2-ANARCHY simulations were performed on the Teide High- Performance Computing facilities provided by the Instituto Tecnol ´ogico y de Energ´ıas Renovables (ITER, SA

    How baryons affect haloes and large-scale structure: a unified picture from the Simba simulation

    Get PDF
    Using the state-of-the-art suite of hydrodynamic simulations Simba, as well as its dark-matter-only counterpart, we study the impact of the presence of baryons and of different stellar/AGN feedback mechanisms on large-scale structure, halo density profiles, and on the abundance of different baryonic phases within halos and in the intergalactic medium (IGM). The unified picture that emerges from our analysis is that the main physical drivers shaping the distribution of matter at all scales are star formation-driven galactic outflows at z>2z>2 for lower mass halos and AGN jets at z<2z<2 in higher mass halos. Feedback suppresses the baryon mass function with time relative to the halo mass function, and it even impacts the halo mass function itself at the ~20% level, particularly evacuating the centres and enhancing dark matter just outside halos. At early epochs baryons pile up in the centres of halos, but by late epochs and particularly in massive systems gas has mostly been evacuated from within the inner halo. AGN jets are so efficient at such evacuation that at low redshifts the baryon fraction within ∼1012−1013 M⊙\sim 10^{12}-10^{13} \, \rm M_{\odot} halos is only 25% of the cosmic baryon fraction, mostly in stars. The baryon fraction enclosed in a sphere around such halos approaches the cosmic value Ωb/Ωm\Omega_{\rm b}/\Omega_{\rm m} only at 10-20 virial radii. As a result, 87% of the baryonic mass in the Universe lies in the IGM at z=0z=0, with 67% being in the form of warm-hot IGM (T>105 KT>10^5 \, \rm K).Comment: submitted to MNRA
    • …
    corecore