Integrative clinical transcriptome analysis reveals TMPRSS2-ERG dependency of prognostic biomarkers in prostate adenocarcinoma

In prostate adenocarcinoma (PCa), distinction between indolent and aggressive disease is challenging. Around 50% of PCa are characterized by TMPRSS2-ERG (T2E)-fusion oncoproteins defining two molecular subtypes (T2E-positive/negative). However, current prognostic tests do not differ between both molecular subtypes, which might affect outcome prediction. To investigate gene-signatures associated with metastasis in T2E-positive and T2E-negative PCa independently, we integrated tumor transcriptomes and clinicopathological data of two cohorts (total n = 783), and analyzed metastasis-associated gene- signatures regarding the T2E-status. Here, we show that the prognostic value of biomarkers in PCa critically depends on the T2E-status. Using gene-set enrichment analyses, we uncovered that metastatic T2E-positive and T2E-negative PCa arecharacterized by distinct gene-signatures. In addition, by testing genes shared by several functional gene-signatures for theirassociation with event-free survival in a validation cohort (n=272), we identifiedfive genes (ASPN,BGN,COL1A1,RRM2andTYMS)—three of which are included in commercially available prognostic tests—whose high expression was significantlyassociated with worse outcome exclusively in T2E-negative PCa. Among these genes,RRM2andTYMSwere validated byimmunohistochemistry in another validation cohort (n=135), and several of them proved to add prognostic information tocurrent clinicopathological predictors, such as Gleason score, exclusively for T2E-negative patients. No prognostic biomarkerswere identified exclusively for T2E-positive tumors. Collectively, our study discovers that the T2E-status, which ispersenot astrong prognostic biomarker, crucially determines the prognostic value of other biomarkers. Our data suggest that themolecular subtype needs to be considered when applying prognostic biomarkers for outcome prediction in PCa. What’s new? Genetic rearrangements involving androgen-regulated transmembrane protease serine 2 and genes from the ETS transcription factor family (T2E), most commonly ERG and ETV1, occur in half of prostate cancers but are currently not considered in risk predictions. The authors integrate clinical and transcriptomic data from multiple studies and show that the prognostic value of biomarkers critically depends on the T2E-status. They identify five biomarkers that predict negative outcome exclusively in T2E-negative prostate cancers, which has implications for outcome prediction based on the molecular subtype.Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 391665916Deutsche Krebshilfe 70112257Dr Leopold and Carmen Ellinger FoundationDr Rolf M. Schwiete FoundationFriedrich-Baur FoundationGert and Susanna Mayer FoundationKind-Philipp FoundationMatthias-Lackas FoundationMehr LEBEN fur Krebskranke Kinder-Bettina-Brau-StiftungWilhelm Sander-Stiftung 2016.167.

Integrative clinical transcriptome analysis reveals TMPRSS2‐ERG dependency of prognostic biomarkers in prostate adenocarcinoma

In prostate adenocarcinoma (PCa), distinction between indolent and aggressive disease is challenging. Around 50% of PCa are characterized by TMPRSS2‐ERG (T2E)‐fusion oncoproteins defining two molecular subtypes (T2E‐positive/negative). However, current prognostic tests do not differ between both molecular subtypes, which might affect outcome prediction. To investigate gene‐signatures associated with metastasis in T2E‐positive and T2E‐negative PCa independently, we integrated tumor transcriptomes and clinicopathological data of two cohorts (total n = 783), and analyzed metastasis‐associated gene‐signatures regarding the T2E‐status. Here, we show that the prognostic value of biomarkers in PCa critically depends on the T2E‐status. Using gene‐set enrichment analyses, we uncovered that metastatic T2E‐positive and T2E‐negative PCa are characterized by distinct gene‐signatures. In addition, by testing genes shared by several functional gene‐signatures for their association with event‐free survival in a validation cohort (n = 272), we identified five genes (ASPN, BGN, COL1A1, RRM2 and TYMS)—three of which are included in commercially available prognostic tests—whose high expression was significantly associated with worse outcome exclusively in T2E‐negative PCa. Among these genes, RRM2 and TYMS were validated by immunohistochemistry in another validation cohort (n = 135), and several of them proved to add prognostic information to current clinicopathological predictors, such as Gleason score, exclusively for T2E‐negative patients. No prognostic biomarkers were identified exclusively for T2E‐positive tumors. Collectively, our study discovers that the T2E‐status, which is per se not a strong prognostic biomarker, crucially determines the prognostic value of other biomarkers. Our data suggest that the molecular subtype needs to be considered when applying prognostic biomarkers for outcome prediction in PCa

High Specificity of BCL11B and GLG1 for EWSR1-FLI1 and EWSR1-ERG Positive Ewing Sarcoma

Ewing sarcoma (EwS) is an aggressive cancer displaying an undifferentiated small-round-cell histomorphology that can be easily confused with a broad spectrum of differential diagnoses. Using comparative transcriptomics and immunohistochemistry (IHC), we previously identified BCL11B and GLG1 as potential specific auxiliary IHC markers for EWSR1-FLI1-positive EwS. Herein, we aimed at validating the specificity of both markers in a far larger and independent cohort of EwS (including EWSR1-ERG-positive cases) and differential diagnoses. Furthermore, we evaluated their intra-tumoral expression heterogeneity. Thus, we stained tissue microarrays from 133 molecularly confirmed EwS cases and 320 samples from morphological mimics, as well as a series of patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models for BCL11B, GLG1, and CD99, and systematically assessed the immunoreactivity and optimal cut-offs for each marker. These analyses demonstrated that high BCL11B and/or GLG1 immunoreactivity in CD99-positive cases had a specificity of 97.5% and an accuracy of 87.4% for diagnosing EwS solely by IHC, and that the markers were expressed by EWSR1-ERG-positive EwS. Only little intra-tumoral heterogeneity in immunoreactivity was observed for differential diagnoses. These results indicate that BCL11B and GLG1 may help as specific auxiliary IHC markers in diagnosing EwS in conjunction with CD99, especially if confirmatory molecular diagnostics are not available