De invloed van inseminatietechniek en arbeidsomstandigheden op de bevruchtingsresultaten van inseminatoren = A study into the working methods and conditions of inseminators

Onderzoek naar de invloed van de arbeidsomstandigheden en inseminatietechniek van de inseminatoren op de bevruchtingsresultaten door middel van een persoonlijke vragenlijst, het een werkdag meelopen en het laten verrichten van proefinseminatie

De invloed van inseminatietechniek en arbeidsomstandigheden op de bevruchtingsresultaten van inseminatoren = A study into the working methods and conditions of inseminators

Onderzoek naar de invloed van de arbeidsomstandigheden en inseminatietechniek van de inseminatoren op de bevruchtingsresultaten door middel van een persoonlijke vragenlijst, het een werkdag meelopen en het laten verrichten van proefinseminatie

Subnormale vitamine-B6-spiegels bij theofyllinegebruik

Contains fulltext : 24935___.PDF (publisher's version ) (Open Access

Plain articaine or prilocaine for spinal anaesthesia in day-case knee arthroscopy: a double-blind randomized trial.

Contains fulltext : 81951.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)BACKGROUND: Both prilocaine and articaine are short-acting local anaesthetics suited for spinal anaesthesia for day-case knee arthroscopy. Articaine is thought to have a faster onset and shorter duration of action than prilocaine, although no comparative study has been published in the anaesthetic literature. METHODS: In this prospective randomized double-blind study, spinal anaesthesia was performed in 72 ASA I-II patients undergoing knee arthroscopy with 50 mg of either plain prilocaine or plain articaine. The primary outcome variable was duration of motor block. Secondary outcomes were onset of sensory and motor blocks, maximum spread of the sensory block, time to spontaneous voiding, and side-effects. RESULTS: Time to full motor function recovery was shorter after articaine than prilocaine [mean (SD) 140 (33) vs 184 (46) min, respectively, P<0.001]. Time to spontaneous voiding was shorter after articaine than prilocaine [mean (SD) 184 (39) vs 227 (45) min, respectively, P<0.001]. One patient in the articaine group reported mild transient neurological symptoms (TNS) limited to the first postoperative day, but there were no significant differences in adverse effects between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal anaesthesia with plain articaine 50 mg resulted in a faster recovery of motor function and earlier spontaneous voiding compared with plain prilocaine 50 mg. Surgical anaesthesia was not different. The incidence of TNS was low

Subnormal vitamin B6 levels in theophylline users

Item does not contain fulltex