Practitioners\u27 Views of Family Strengths: A Delphi Study

Reported is a research study to assess the opinions of family practitioners on the status of families in Oklahoma. Researchers employed the Delphi method to achieve consensus among key informants in the family practice field about the strengths and weaknesses of Oklahoma families, threats facing families in the state, and means to strengthening family life in Oklahoma. The study yielded qualitative data from the key informants, which the researchers then condensed into response categories to feed back to informants to rate. Family practitioners identified resilience, spirituality, and access to support systems as the greatest strengths, and listed substance abuse, poverty, and generational cycles of dysfunction as the greatest weaknesses of Oklahoma families. Recommendations by these practitioners are given for improvements in addressing family needs

Clinical efficacy and safety of a novel antifungal, Fosmanogepix, in patients with candidemia caused by Candida auris : results from a Phase 2 trial

DATA AVAILABILITY: Upon request, and subject to review, Pfizer will provide the data that support the findings of this study. Subject to certain criteria, conditions and exceptions, Pfizer may also provide access to the related individual de-identified participant data. See https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical-trials/trial-data-and-results for more information.Fosmanogepix (FMGX), a novel antifungal available in intravenous (IV) and oral formulations, has broad-spectrum activity against pathogenic yeasts and molds, including fungi resistant to standard of care antifungals. This multicenter, open-label, single-arm study evaluated FMGX safety and efficacy for treatment of candidemia and/or invasive candidiasis caused by Candida auris. Eligible participants were ≥18 years, with established candidemia and/or invasive candidiasis caused by C. auris, (cultured within 120 h [for candidemia] or 168 h [for invasive candidiasis without candidemia] with accompanying clinical signs) and limited treatment options. Participants were treated with FMGX (≤42 days; loading dose: 1000 mg IV twice daily [Day 1], followed by 600 mg IV once daily [QD]). Switching to oral FMGX 800 mg QD was permitted from Day 4. Primary endpoint was treatment success (survival and clearance of C. auris from blood/tissue cultures without additional antifungals) at the end of the study treatment (EOST), assessed by an independent data review committee (DRC). Day 30 survival was a secondary endpoint. In vitro susceptibility of Candida isolates was assessed. Nine participants with candidemia (male:6, female:3; 21 to 76 years) in intensive care units in South Africa were enrolled; all received IV FMGX only. DRC-assessed treatment success at EOST and Day 30 survival were 89% (8/9). No treatment related adverse events or study drug discontinuations were reported. FMGX demonstrated potent in vitro activity against all C. auris isolates (MIC range: 0.008 to 0.015 μg/mL [CLSI]; 0.004–0.03 μg/mL [EUCAST]), with the lowest MICs compared to other antifungals tested. Thus, the results showed that FMGX was safe, well-tolerated, and efficacious in participants with candidemia caused by C. auris.Amplyx, a subsidiary of Pfizer Inc.https://journals.asm.org/journal/aacCritical Car

Shiga Toxin 1 Induces on Lipopolysaccharide-Treated Astrocytes the Release of Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha that Alter Brain-Like Endothelium Integrity

The hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) is characterized by hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia and renal dysfunction. The typical form of HUS is generally associated with infections by Gram-negative Shiga toxin (Stx)-producing Escherichia coli (STEC). Endothelial dysfunction induced by Stx is central, but bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and neutrophils (PMN) contribute to the pathophysiology. Although renal failure is characteristic of this syndrome, neurological complications occur in severe cases and is usually associated with death. Impaired blood-brain barrier (BBB) is associated with damage to cerebral endothelial cells (ECs) that comprise the BBB. Astrocytes (ASTs) are inflammatory cells in the brain and determine the BBB function. ASTs are in close proximity to ECs, hence the study of the effects of Stx1 and LPS on ASTs, and the influence of their response on ECs is essential. We have previously demonstrated that Stx1 and LPS induced activation of rat ASTs and the release of inflammatory factors such as TNF-α, nitric oxide and chemokines. Here, we demonstrate that rat ASTs-derived factors alter permeability of ECs with brain properties (HUVECd); suggesting that functional properties of BBB could also be affected. Additionally, these factors activate HUVECd and render them into a proagregant state promoting PMN and platelets adhesion. Moreover, these effects were dependent on ASTs secreted-TNF-α. Stx1 and LPS-induced ASTs response could influence brain ECs integrity and BBB function once Stx and factors associated to the STEC infection reach the brain parenchyma and therefore contribute to the development of the neuropathology observed in HUS

Ruth Irelan Knee: Influencing Progress in Mental Health

Ruth Irelan Knee (1920-2008) was a major player and eyewitness observer of dramatic changes in the treatment of the mentally ill. Early on in her career she experienced interdisciplinary treatment for the mentally ill and organized efforts for addressing mental health and other afflictions, which confront families and communities. She believed that social work could be at the forefront in developing rational approaches to addressing mental health and other social issues through community development. And she placed great value in having social workers at the table with other disciplines to accomplish needed change. Throughout her career and life she stood out as an extraordinary advocate for her chosen profession

Evaluating social programs

xii, 354 p. : il.; 24 cm

Linguistic Deviations in the Written Academic Register of Danish University Students

Danish university students are often criticised for a general lack of proficiency in orthography, punctuation and grammar in the academic register. However, there has been limited empirical substantiation to support the claim. In this paper, we present the results of a study of linguistic deviations in university assignments written by first-year Journalism and Danish students at the University of Southern Denmark (N = 100 students). The results show that the majority of both groups struggles with Danish orthography and punctuation when writing academically, which seems to confirm some of the assertions made by the critics. However, it is argued that the inherent conflict of orthographic and punctuation principles in Danish as well as the specific characteristics and challenges of academic writing are more probable causes than the claimed general decline in the writing proficiency of students