Comparative effectiveness of biologic agents for the treatment of psoriasis in a real-world setting: Results from a large, prospective, observational study (Psoriasis Longitudinal Assessment and Registry [PSOLAR])

n/

Biological treatment for psoriasis and the risk of herpes zoster: Results from the Psoriasis Longitudinal Assessment and Registry (PSOLAR).

PURPOSE: To describe the risk of herpes zoster (HZ) in patients with psoriasis and its relation to non-biologic systemic therapies or biologic treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Psoriasis Longitudinal Assessment and Registry (PSOLAR) is an international, prospective, registry that follows adult patients with psoriasis eligible to receive non-biologic systemic therapies or biologic therapies. Mutually exclusive therapy cohorts were defined. HZ incident rates were calculated for each therapy cohort and rates between cohorts were compared using hazard ratios (HR) adjusted for potential confounders, in new users and prevalent-exposure patients. RESULTS: A total of 55 HZ events were identified in 10,469 patients in PSOLAR. The adjusted hazard ratio in the overall study population (new user and prevalent-exposed patients) was 2.22 (95% CI: 0.82-5.97; p = 0.116) for tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF) inhibitors, 2.73 (0.98-7.58; p = 0.054) for ustekinumab, and 1.04 (0.20-5.41; p = 0.966) for methotrexate vs. reference (combined phototherapy, systemic steroids, topical therapy, and immunomodulators other than methotrexate). CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to ustekinumab, TNF-alpha inhibitors, and methotrexate was not associated with a statistically significant increased risk of HZ. However, HRs were elevated for ustekinumab and TNF-alpha inhibitors; a larger number of herpes zoster events would be needed to assess the presence or absence of risk

ESTIMATION OF GENETIC PARAMETERS ASSOCIATED WITH THE COMPETITIVE ABILITY OF TRIBOLIUM CASTANEUM

When individuals coexist in a common environment, there is the possibility that they will interact. One type of interaction is competition. Earlier work in this laboratory examined the effects of natural selection for a limited food resource. It was found that the competitive abilities, of two populations of Tribolium castaneum (Pearl and Black), did respond to natural selection, but that the mechanisms responsible for the responses were different. In this investigation, the two populations of Tribolium castaneum were examined. Genetic parameters were estimated for traits important to the outcome of competition, and were evaluated in terms of direct and associate effects. The traits considered were Survival and Biomass. Each trait was examined in two environments; Mixed and Separate cultures. In Mixed cultures, the two populations (Pearl and Black), were evaluated in competition with a third Tester population ( + foundation). The Pearl and Black populations were structured in such a manner to allow the estimation of genetic parameters (heritability and genetic correlations). The genetic parameters were then used to predict direct and correlated responses to selection. Selection responses were predicted based on a multiple trait model, which accounted for both the effect of the environment and associate effects. The selection responses (predicted), based on the multiple trait model, were compared to those based on the classical model (not accounting for associate effects). It was found that predicted selection responses, based on the multiple trait model, differed from the classical model. However, the responses based on the multiple trait model were subject to large sampling variances. Despite the large sampling variance, the multiple trait model represents a more realistic representation of the biological situation, and was used to account for past responses to selection

Response to Treatment with Intravenous Golimumab or Infliximab in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: PROMIS Results from the Real-World Observational Phase 4 AWARE Study

Abstract Introduction To assess changes in the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) outcomes related to social, mental, and physical well-being after approximately 1 year of intravenous (IV) golimumab or infliximab treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using real-world evidence from AWARE. Methods AWARE was a prospective, noninterventional, multicenter, observational, U.S.-based phase 4 study of 1270 RA patients who initiated treatment with IV golimumab or infliximab. PROMIS-29 and PROMIS short form (SF) Fatigue 7a and Pain Interference 6b questionnaires were administered at baseline and infusions 2, 5, and 8 (approximately weeks  4, 28, and 52 for IV golimumab and weeks  2, 22, and 46 for infliximab). Mean changes from baseline in all PROMIS-29 domains and respective SFs and response rates for achieving ≥ 3, ≥ 5, or ≥ 10-point improvements were determined. Results Among all patients, baseline mean ± SD PROMIS T-scores were consistent between treatment groups and indicated worse physical function (38.2 ± 6.8 IV golimumab, 38.0 ± 6.9 infliximab), more pain interference (63.0 ± 7.6 IV golimumab, 63.9 ± 7.8 infliximab), and greater fatigue (58.4 ± 9.9 IV golimumab, 59.4 ± 10.0 infliximab) in these patients vs the general U.S. population (T-score = 50). Through the 8th infusion of either treatment, IV golimumab- and infliximab-treated patients achieved meaningful improvements (≥ 3-point improvement in T-scores) in all PROMIS-29 domains and respective SFs, and the proportions of patients with ≥ 3, ≥ 5, or ≥ 10-point improvements in T-scores increased from infusion 2 through infusion 8. Conclusions RA patients treated with IV golimumab or infliximab achieved comparable improvements across social, mental, and physical well-being PROMIS measures. Additionally, PROMIS detected meaningful clinical changes in patient-reported outcomes in both treatment groups. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT02728934

Machine Learning Applied to Patient‐Reported Outcomes to Classify Physician‐Derived Measures of Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity

Objective Patient‐reported outcome (PRO) data have assumed increasing importance in the care of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), yet physician‐derived disease activity measures, such as Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), remain the most accepted metrics to assess disease activity. The possibility that newer longitudinal PRO data might be used as a proxy for the CDAI has not been evaluated. Methods Using data from a large pragmatic trial, we evaluated patients with RA initiating golimumab intravenous or infliximab. The classification target was low disease activity (LDA) (CDAI ≤10) at the first visit between months 3 and 12. Data were randomly partitioned into training (80%) and test (20%) data sets. Multiple machine learning (ML) methods (eg, random forests, gradient boosting, support vector machines) were used to classify CDAI disease activity category, conduct feature selection, and assess feature importance. Model performance evaluated cross‐validated error, comparing different ML approaches using both training and test data. Results A total of 494 patients were analyzed, and 36.4% achieved LDA. The most important classification features included several Patient‐Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System measures (social participation, pain interference, pain intensity, and physical function), patient global, and baseline CDAI. Among all ML methods, random forests performed best. Overall model accuracy and positive predictive values for all ML methods were approximately 80%. Conclusion ML methods coupled with longitudinal PRO data appear useful and can achieve reasonable accuracy in classifying LDA among patients starting a new biologic. This approach has promise for real‐world evidence generation in the common circumstance when physician‐derived disease activity data are not available yet PRO measures are

Effect of Age of Onset of Psoriasis on Clinical Outcomes with Systemic Treatment in the Psoriasis Longitudinal Assessment and Registry (PSOLAR)

Contains fulltext : 199017.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Effect of Recombinant Human Erythropoietin on Functional Outcomes in Anemic, Critically ill, Trauma Subjects: The Long Term Trauma Outcomes Study

BACKGROUND: Achieving a higher hemoglobin (Hb) level might allow the anemic, critically ill, trauma patient to have an improved outcome during rehabilitation therapy. METHODS: Patients with major blunt trauma orthopedic injuries were administered epoetin alfa or placebo weekly both in hospital and for up to 12 weeks after discharge or until the Hb level was \u3e12.0 g/dL, whichever occurred first. The 36-question Short Form Health Assessment questionnaire (SF-36) was used to evaluate physical function (PF) outcomes at baseline, at hospital discharge, and at several time points posthospital discharge. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-two patients were enrolled (epoetin alfa [n = 97], placebo [n = 95]). Hb increased from baseline to hospital discharge in both groups (epoetin alfa: 1.2 g/dL vs placebo: 0.9 g/dL), and transfusion requirements were similar between groups. Both groups showed improvements in SF-36 PF; there were no significant differences in the average of all posthospital discharge scores (epoetin alfa: 27.3 vs placebo 30.9; P = 0.38). Thromboembolic events were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: No differences were observed in physical function outcomes or safety in anemic, critically ill, trauma patients treated with epoetin alfa compared with placebo

Efficacy and safety of guselkumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis who had inadequate efficacy and/or intolerance to one prior tumor necrosis factor inhibitor: study protocol for SOLSTICE, a phase 3B, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Abstract Background Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) are frequently chosen as the first biologic for patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Given that many patients with PsA are TNFi inadequate responders (TNF-IR; either inadequate efficacy or intolerance), treatments utilizing alternative mechanisms of action are needed. In phase 3 studies, the fully human interleukin (IL)-23p19 subunit-inhibitor, guselkumab, was efficacious in patients with active PsA, including TNFi-IR. Efficacy was generally consistent between TNFi-naïve and TNFi-experienced cohorts; however, in the latter, higher response rates have been observed with the Q4W dosing regimen relative to the Q8W dosing regimen for some endpoints, suggesting the need to evaluate whether more frequent dosing may provide an incremental clinical benefit for TNFi-IR patients. Methods The phase 3b SOLSTICE study will assess guselkumab efficacy and safety in TNFi-IR PsA patients. Eligibility criteria include a PsA diagnosis for ≥ 6 months; active disease (≥ 3 swollen, ≥ 3 tender joints, C-reactive protein ≥ 0.3 mg/dL); and inadequate efficacy with, and/or intolerance to, one prior TNFi. Participants will be randomized 1:1:1 to guselkumab Q4W or Q8W or placebo→guselkumab Q4W (at Week 24). The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients achieving ≥ 20% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20) at Week 24. Major secondary endpoints include ACR50, ACR70; an Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) of psoriasis score of 0/1 plus ≥ 2-grade reduction and ≥ 90% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (both among patients with ≥ 3% body surface area affected by psoriasis and baseline IGA ≥ 2); minimal/very low disease activity; and changes from baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey Physical Component Summary, and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue scores. The target sample size (N = 450) is estimated to provide > 90% power in detecting differences between each guselkumab group and the placebo group for the primary endpoint assuming a 2-sided α = 0.05. Cochran-Mantel–Haenszel testing and analyses of covariance will be used to compare efficacy for binary and continuous endpoints, respectively. Discussion Findings from the phase 3b SOLSTICE study, the design of which was informed by results from previously conducted phase 3 studies, is expected to provide important efficacy and safety information on guselkumab therapy in TNFi-IR patients with PsA. Trial registration This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04936308, on 23 June 2021