13 research outputs found
The potential of improved animal welfare as an environmental impact mitigation strategy in dairy sheep farming
The urgent need to limit global warming requires all productive sectors to commit to the reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In this context, the livestock sector, responsible for 14.5% of anthropogenic GHG emissions, is called upon to choose and implement appropriate mitigation solutions. Relatively few studies have quantified the effect of poor animal welfare on the environmental impact of farms. Therefore, it is difficult to hypothesise to which extent good practices of animal welfare improvement might contribute to GHG mitigation. The present work aims to quantify the GHG mitigation potential allowed by the improvement of impaired welfare scenarios in dairy sheep farms from the Mediterranean basin
A scenario study to understand the climatic cost of impaired welfare on dairy sheep using a deterministic modelling approach
Should animal welfare indicators be integrated into the environmental impact assessment?
Health care providersâ experiences of pain management and attitudes towards digitally supported self-management interventions for chronic pain: a qualitative study
Background
Chronic pain constitutes a significant burden for the individuals affected, and is a frequent reason why patients seek health care services. While in-person psychosocial interventions can be of support to people living with chronic pain, such interventions are not always accessible. eHealth interventions may provide greater accessibility, but the evidence and use of digital self-management solutions for chronic pain are still limited and the lack of health care provider input in the development process of such solutions a concern. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to investigate health care providersâ experiences of treating patients with chronic pain, their attitudes towards, and use of, digital solutions in pain management, and their suggestions for content and design elements for a potential digital pain self-management intervention.
Methods
Twelve health care providers representing a variety of health care disciplines participated in semi-structured interviews. The interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis.
Results
The material was analyzed into three main themes: [1] Patients with chronic pain and their current use of the health care services, [2] Health care providersâ own motivation and impression of patient prerequisites for use of digital self-management interventions, and [3] Suggestions for content and design elements in a digital self-management intervention for people living with chronic pain. The challenges faced by patients living with chronic pain were described as numerous. Despite interest and positive attitudes, few of the health care providers had used or recommended eHealth solutions to their patients. A range of potential content and functionality elements were identified, including aspects of motivation and engagement and providers also emphasized the importance of easy access and positive, personal content to support existing treatment.
Conclusions
This study offers insights into health care providersâ considerations for the potential of digital self-management interventions supporting patients living with chronic pain. Findings indicate the need for change and a more comprehensive treatment approach to pain management. eHealth solutions may contribute to such change, and providers pointed to a need for health care provider involvement, timely support and follow-up as important factors for integrating digital pain self-management interventions into clinical care.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT0370510