Non-HLA Genetic Factors and Their Influence on Heart Transplant Outcomes : A Systematic Review

Background: Improvement of immunosuppressive therapies and surgical techniques has increased the survival rate after heart transplantation. Nevertheless, a large number of patients still experience complications, such as allograft rejection, vasculopathy, kidney dysfunction, and diabetes in response to immunosuppressive therapy. Variants in HLA genes have been extensively studied for their role in clinical outcomes after transplantation, whereas the knowledge about non-HLA genetic variants in this setting is still limited. Non-HLA polymorphisms are involved in the metabolism of major immunosuppressive therapeutics and may play a role in clinical outcomes after cardiac transplantation. This systematic review summarizes the existing knowledge of associations between non-HLA genetic variation and heart transplant outcomes. Methods: The current evidence available on genetic polymorphisms associated with outcomes after heart transplantation was identified by a systematic search in PubMed and Embase. Studies reporting on polymorphisms significantly associated with clinical outcomes after cardiac transplantation were included. Results: A total of 56 studies were included, all were candidate gene studies. These studies identified 58 polymorphisms in 36 genes that were associated with outcomes after cardiac transplantation. Variants in TGFB1, CYP3A5, and ABCB1 are consistently replicated across multiple studies for various transplant outcomes. Conclusions: The research currently available supports the hypothesis that non-HLA polymorphisms are associated with clinical outcomes after heart transplantation. However, many genetic variants were only identified in a single study, questioning their true effect on the clinical outcomes tested. Further research in larger cohorts with well-defined phenotypes is warranted

Anomalous coronary artery originating from the opposite sinus of Valsalva (ACAOS), fractional flow reserve- and intravascular ultrasound-guided management in adult patients

Item does not contain fulltex

Effect of stent implantation on blood pressure control in adults with coarctation of the aorta

Background: Stenting of coarctation of the aorta (CoA) generally results in good angiographic results and a decrease in transcoarctation pressure gradient. However, effect on blood pressure control is less clear. The goal of the current retrospective analysis was to investigate the effects of CoA stenting on blood pressure control. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted in consecutive adult patients with a CoA who underwent a percutaneous intervention at one of the three participating hospitals. Measurements included office blood pressure, invasive peak-to-peak systolic pressure over the CoA, diameter of the intima lumen at the narrowest part of the CoA and use of medication. The follow-up data were obtained, based on the most recent examination date. Results: There were 26 native CoA and 17 recurrent CoAs (total n = 43). Seven of them underwent two procedures. Mean peak-to-peak gradient decreased from 27 mmHg to 3 mmHg (p < 0.001), and minimal diameter increased from a mean of 11 mm to 18 mm (p < 0.001). Mean systolic blood pressure decreased from 151 ± 18 mmHg to 135 ± 19 mmHg at first follow-up of 3.8 ± 1.9 months and 137 ± 22 mmHg at latest follow-up of 19.5 ± 10.9 months (p = 0.001 and p = 0.009, compared to baseline, respectively). The total number of hypertensive patients decreased from 74% to 27% at latest follow-up. No significant change in antihypertensive medication was observed. Conclusion: A clinically significant decrease in systolic blood pressure of approximately 16 mmHg was shown after (re)intervention in CoA patients, which sustained at follow-up. This sustained decrease of blood pressure can be expected to lead to less future adverse cardiovascular events

Medium-term systemic blood pressure after stenting of aortic coarctation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: Long-term prognosis of patients with coarctation of the aorta (CoA) is impaired due to the high prevalence of hypertension and consequent cardiovascular complications. Although stent implantation results in acute anatomical and haemodynamic benefit, limited evidence exists regarding the late clinical outcome. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the medium-term effect of stent placement for CoA on systemic blood pressure (BP). METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched for non-randomised cohort studies addressing systemic BP ≥12 months following CoA stenting. Meta-analysis was performed on the change in BP from baseline to last follow-up using a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were conducted to identify sources of heterogeneity between studies. RESULTS: Twenty-six studies with a total of 1157 patients and a median follow-up of 26 months were included for final analysis. Meta-analysis showed a 20.3 mm Hg (95% CI 16.4 to 24.1 mm Hg; p<0.00001) reduction in systolic BP and an 8.2 mm Hg (12 studies; 95% CI 5.2 to 11.3 mm Hg; p<0.00001) reduction in diastolic BP. A concomitant decrease in the use of antihypertensive medication was observed. High systolic BP and peak systolic gradient at baseline and stenting of native CoA were associated with a greater reduction in systolic BP at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Stent implantation for CoA is associated with a significant decline in systolic and diastolic BP during medium-term follow-up. The degree of BP reduction appears to be dependent on baseline systolic BP, baseline peak systolic gradient, and whether stenting is performed for native or recurrent CoA

Medium-term systemic blood pressure after stenting of aortic coarctation : a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective Long-term prognosis of patients with coarctation of the aorta (CoA) is impaired due to the high prevalence of hypertension and consequent cardiovascular complications. Although stent implantation results in acute anatomical and haemodynamic benefit, limited evidence exists regarding the late clinical outcome. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the medium-term effect of stent placement for CoA on systemic blood pressure (BP). Methods PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched for non-randomised cohort studies addressing systemic BP ≥12 months following CoA stenting. Meta-analysis was performed on the change in BP from baseline to last follow-up using a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were conducted to identify sources of heterogeneity between studies. Results Twenty-six studies with a total of 1157 patients and a median follow-up of 26 months were included for final analysis. Meta-analysis showed a 20.3 mm Hg (95% CI 16.4 to 24.1 mm Hg; p<0.00001) reduction in systolic BP and an 8.2 mm Hg (12 studies; 95% CI 5.2 to 11.3 mm Hg; p<0.00001) reduction in diastolic BP. A concomitant decrease in the use of antihypertensive medication was observed. High systolic BP and peak systolic gradient at baseline and stenting of native CoA were associated with a greater reduction in systolic BP at follow-up. Conclusions Stent implantation for CoA is associated with a significant decline in systolic and diastolic BP during medium-term follow-up. The degree of BP reduction appears to be dependent on baseline systolic BP, baseline peak systolic gradient, and whether stenting is performed for native or recurrent CoA

Baffle Complications in Adults After Atrial Switch for Transposition of the Great Arteries

BACKGROUND: Baffle complications, ie, leakage or stenosis, after an atrial switch operation (AtrSO) for transposition of the great arteries (TGA) are difficult to detect with the use of routine transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). We examined baffle interventions and the prevalence of baffle complications. METHODS: This dual-centre study followed TGA-AtrSO patients for the occurrence of baffle interventions. In addition, in 2017-2019, prevalence of baffle complications was determined in patients undergoing routine contrast-enhanced (CE) TTE including various hemodynamic conditions and computed tomography (CT). Baffle leaks were defined as right-to-left shunting on CE-TTE and baffle stenosis as a systemic venous baffle diameter of < 10 mm on CT. RESULTS: In total, 67 TGA-AtrSO patients were followed to a median age of 38 (interquartile range 34-42) years, for a median of 9 (6-13) years. Baffle interventions were documented in 24 patients (36%). Cumulative risk of baffle interventions was 25% after 15 years of follow-up. Prevalence of baffle complications was determined in 29/67 patients. In total, 4 (14%) had patent baffles, 11 (38%) had leakage only, 5 (17%) had stenosis only, and 9 (31%) had both, while 24/29 (84%) were asymptomatic. Although baffle leaks were not associated with clinical characteristics, peak work rate during exercise TTE was lower in patients with vs without stenosis (89 ± 24 W vs 123 ± 21 W; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Baffle complications are common in TGA-AtrSO. The cumulative risk of baffle interventions was 25% after 15 years of follow-up. CE-TTE uncovered asymptomatic baffle leakage in the majority of patients, especially with examination during exercise. CT revealed baffle stenosis in almost half of the patients, which was associated with decreased exercise tolerance. Awareness of these findings may alter clinical follow-up

Temsirolimus does not impact the levels of reactive oxygen species and superoxide in HGPS cells.

<p>(A) Immunochemistry was performed on control (GMO3349C) and HGPS (HGADFN003) fibroblasts mock-treated or temsirolimus-treated for the indicated periods. Live cells were stained with an oxidative stress detection reagent for ROS and a superoxide detection reagent. The negative control was treated with N-acetyl-L-cysteine to quench the signal intensity. The positive control was treated with pycocyanin to induce ROS production. DNA was stained with Hoechst 33342. Representative images are shown (n = 4). Scale-bar: 20 μm. (B) The same cells and detection reagents as in (A) were used to perform a 96-well microplate assay as described in Methods. The percentage of activity was calculated relative to mock-treated control cells. Data are expressed as the mean ± S.D. (*p-value ≤ 0.05; n = 4).</p

Baffle Complications in Adults After Atrial Switch for Transposition of the Great Arteries

Background: Baffle complications, ie, leakage or stenosis, after an atrial switch operation (AtrSO) for transposition of the great arteries (TGA) are difficult to detect with the use of routine transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). We examined baffle interventions and the prevalence of baffle complications. Methods: This dual-centre study followed TGA-AtrSO patients for the occurrence of baffle interventions. In addition, in 2017-2019, prevalence of baffle complications was determined in patients undergoing routine contrast-enhanced (CE) TTE including various hemodynamic conditions and computed tomography (CT). Baffle leaks were defined as right-to-left shunting on CE-TTE and baffle stenosis as a systemic venous baffle diameter of < 10 mm on CT. Results: In total, 67 TGA-AtrSO patients were followed to a median age of 38 (interquartile range 34-42) years, for a median of 9 (6-13) years. Baffle interventions were documented in 24 patients (36%). Cumulative risk of baffle interventions was 25% after 15 years of follow-up. Prevalence of baffle complications was determined in 29/67 patients. In total, 4 (14%) had patent baffles, 11 (38%) had leakage only, 5 (17%) had stenosis only, and 9 (31%) had both, while 24/29 (84%) were asymptomatic. Although baffle leaks were not associated with clinical characteristics, peak work rate during exercise TTE was lower in patients with vs without stenosis (89 ± 24 W vs 123 ± 21 W; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Baffle complications are common in TGA-AtrSO. The cumulative risk of baffle interventions was 25% after 15 years of follow-up. CE-TTE uncovered asymptomatic baffle leakage in the majority of patients, especially with examination during exercise. CT revealed baffle stenosis in almost half of the patients, which was associated with decreased exercise tolerance. Awareness of these findings may alter clinical follow-up