11 research outputs found

    Fibroblast PER2 circadian rhythmicity depends on cell density.

    No full text
    Like neurons in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), the master circadian pacemaker in the brain, single fibroblasts can function as independent oscillators. In the SCN, synaptic and paracrine signaling among cells creates a robust, synchronized circadian oscillation, whereas there is no evidence for such integration in fibroblast cultures. However, interactions among single-cell fibroblast oscillators cannot be completely excluded, because fibroblasts were not isolated in previous work. In this study, we tested the autonomy of fibroblasts as single-cell circadian oscillators in high- and low-density culture, by single-cell imaging of cells from PER2::LUC circadian reporter mice. We found greatly reduced PER2::LUC rhythmicity in low-density cultures, which could result from lack of either constitutive or rhythmic paracrine signals from neighboring fibroblasts. To discriminate between these 2 possibilities, we mixed PER2::LUC wild-type (WT) cells with nonluminescent, nonrhythmic Bmal1-/- cells, so that density of rhythmic cells was low but overall cell density remained high. In this condition, WT cells showed clear rhythmicity similar to high-density cultures. We also mixed PER2::LUC WT cells with nonluminescent, long period Cry2-/- cells. In this condition, WT cells showed a period no different from cells cultured with rhythmic WT cells or nonrhythmic Bmal1-/- cells. In previous work, we found that low Kāŗ suppresses fibroblast rhythmicity, and we and others have found that either low Kāŗ or low CaĀ²āŗ suppresses SCN rhythmicity. Therefore, we attempted to rescue rhythmicity of low-density fibroblasts with high Kāŗ (21 mM), high CaĀ²āŗ (3.6 mM), or conditioned medium. Conditioned medium from high-density fibroblast cultures rescued rhythmicity of low-density cultures, whereas high Kāŗ or CaĀ²āŗ medium did not consistently rescue rhythmicity. These data suggest that fibroblasts require paracrine signals from adjacent cells for normal expression of rhythmicity, but that these signals do not have to be rhythmic, and that rhythmic signals from other cells do not affect the intrinsic periods of fibroblasts

    NPAS2 Compensates for Loss of CLOCK in Peripheral Circadian Oscillators

    No full text
    <div><p>Heterodimers of CLOCK and BMAL1 are the major transcriptional activators of the mammalian circadian clock. Because the paralog NPAS2 can substitute for CLOCK in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), the master circadian pacemaker, CLOCK-deficient mice maintain circadian rhythms in behavior and in tissues <i>in vivo</i>. However, when isolated from the SCN, CLOCK-deficient peripheral tissues are reportedly arrhythmic, suggesting a fundamental difference in circadian clock function between SCN and peripheral tissues. Surprisingly, however, using luminometry and single-cell bioluminescence imaging of PER2 expression, we now find that CLOCK-deficient dispersed SCN neurons and peripheral cells exhibit similarly stable, autonomous circadian rhythms <i>in vitro</i>. In CLOCK-deficient fibroblasts, knockdown of <i>Npas2</i> leads to arrhythmicity, suggesting that NPAS2 can compensate for loss of CLOCK in peripheral cells as well as in SCN. Our data overturn the notion of an SCN-specific role for NPAS2 in the molecular circadian clock, and instead indicate that, at the cellular level, the core loops of SCN neuron and peripheral cell circadian clocks are fundamentally similar.</p></div

    Knockdown of <i>Npas2</i> expression suppresses circadian rhythms in <i>Clock</i><sup><i>-/-</i></sup> fibroblasts.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Fibroblasts dispersed from wild type and <i>Clock</i><sup><i>-/-</i></sup> mice were treated with lentiviral vectors carrying an <i>Npas2</i>-KD or scrambled DNA sequence, as well as a GFP reporter. Simultaneous fluorescence and bioluminescence images of a representative field show GFP expression marking transfected cells (left, green) and mPer2<sup>Luc</sup> bioluminescence from both transfected and untransfected cells (middle, red). The overlay shows that circadian rhythms could be measured from both transfected (filled arrowheads) and untransfected (unfilled arrowheads) fibroblasts in the same culture dish. (B) Percentage of wild type (left) and <i>Clock</i><sup><i>-/-</i></sup> (right) fibroblasts treated with <i>Npas2</i>-KD lentiviruses (top) or scrambled lentiviruses (bottom) that were significantly rhythmic. ***<i>p</i>ā‰¤0.001 (Fisherā€™s exact test); number of cells are given in parentheses. (C) mPer2<sup>Luc</sup> rhythms of representative individual dispersed untransfected (top) and transfected (bottom) <i>Clock</i><sup><i>-/-</i></sup> fibroblasts from the same culture dish.</p

    Peripheral organs of <i>Clock</i><sup><i>-/-</i></sup> mice can exhibit circadian rhythms <i>in vitro</i>.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Two representative mPer2<sup>Luc</sup> bioluminescence rhythms of rhythmic organotypic liver (black), lung (blue), kidney (red), and adrenal (green) slice cultures from wild type (left) and <i>Clock</i><sup><i>-/-</i></sup> (right) mice. After ~7 culture days, samples were treated with 10 Ī¼M forskolin (arrow). Y-axis scales are adjusted to amplitudes for better visualization of data. (B) Circadian mPer2<sup>Luc</sup> rhythm period, amplitude, damping constant (days to reach 1/e of initial amplitude), and phase of first peak after forskolin treatment, and % of slices from wild type (unfilled bars) and <i>Clock</i><sup><i>-/-</i></sup> mice (filled bars) that were significantly rhythmic after forskolin treatment (culture days 8ā€“14). Data are shown as mean Ā± SEM; *<i>p</i>ā‰¤0.05, **<i>p</i>ā‰¤0.01, ***<i>p</i>ā‰¤0.001 (studentā€™s t-test); or % of slices rhythmic; n = 8.</p

    Dispersed <i>Clock</i><sup><i>-/-</i></sup> fibroblasts show circadian rhythms comparable to those of dispersed <i>Clock</i><sup><i>-/-</i></sup> SCN neurons.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Raster plots of bioluminescence intensity of individual dispersed wild-type (left, n = 320) and <i>Clock</i><sup><i>-/-</i></sup> (right, n = 121) SCN cells. Data are presented as in <a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005882#pgen.1005882.g001" target="_blank">Fig 1C</a>. (B) Images of mPer2<sup>Luc</sup> expression of representative rhythmic wild-type (left) and <i>Clock</i><sup><i>-/-</i></sup> (right) fibroblasts. (C) Two representative mPer2<sup>Luc</sup> bioluminescence rhythms of individual rhythmic wild-type (left) and <i>Clock</i><sup><i>-/-</i></sup> (right) fibroblasts. (D) Circadian period, amplitude, and goodness of fit of mPer2<sup>Luc</sup> rhythms, and % of cells that were significantly rhythmic, for individual wild type (left) and <i>Clock</i><sup><i>-/-</i></sup> (right) fibroblasts. Data are shown as mean Ā± SEM; *<i>p</i>ā‰¤0.05, ***<i>p</i>ā‰¤0.001 (Studentā€™s t-test); or % of cells rhythmic; ***<i>p</i>ā‰¤0.001 (Fisherā€™s exact test); WT: n (rhythmic/total) = 320/321; <i>Clock</i><sup><i>-/-</i></sup>: n = 121/163.</p

    The SCN oscillator network is responsible for stable rhythms in <i>Clock</i><sup><i>-/-</i></sup> SCN neurons.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Raster plots of mPer2<sup>Luc</sup> bioluminescence intensity of individual dispersed wild-type (left, n = 246) and <i>Clock</i><sup><i>-/-</i></sup> (right, n = 161) SCN cells. Data are presented as in <a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005882#pgen.1005882.g001" target="_blank">Fig 1C</a>. (B) mPer2<sup>Luc</sup> bioluminescence rhythms of two representative rhythmic individual dispersed SCN neurons from wild type (left) and <i>Clock</i><sup><i>-/-</i></sup> mice (right). (C) Circadian period, amplitude, and sine wave goodness-of-fit of cellular mPer2<sup>Luc</sup> rhythms, and the percentage of rhythmic neurons in dispersed SCN cultures from wild type (white), <i>Clock</i><sup><i>-/-</i></sup> (black), and <i>Bmal1</i><sup><i>-/-</i></sup> (patterned) mice. <i>Bmal1</i><sup><i>-/-</i></sup> data are from Ko et al [<a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005882#pgen.1005882.ref018" target="_blank">18</a>]. Data are shown as mean Ā± SEM; ***<i>p</i>ā‰¤0.001 (studentā€™s t-test); or as percentage of cells that are significantly rhythmic; WT: n (rhythmic/total) = 234/255; <i>Clock</i><sup><i>-/-</i></sup>: n = 138/208; <i>Bmal1</i><sup><i>-/-</i></sup>: n = 30/243.</p
    corecore