Cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the assessment of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a pilot study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Before trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), assessment of cardiac function and accurate measurement of the aortic root are key to determine the correct size and type of the prosthesis. The aim of this study was to compare cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and trans-thoracic echocardiography (TTE) for the assessment of aortic valve measurements and left ventricular function in high-risk elderly patients submitted to TAVI.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis and contraindications for surgical aortic valve replacement were screened from April 2009 to January 2011 and imaged with TTE and CMR.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Patients who underwent both TTE and CMR (n = 49) had a mean age of 80.8 ± 4.8 years and a mean logistic EuroSCORE of 14.9 ± 9.3%. There was a good correlation between TTE and CMR in terms of annulus size (R²= 0.48, p < 0.001), left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) diameter (R²= 0.62, p < 0.001) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (R²= 0.47, p < 0.001) and a moderate correlation in terms of aortic valve area (AVA) (R²= 0.24, p < 0.001). CMR generally tended to report larger values than TTE for all measurements. The Bland-Altman test indicated that the 95% limits of agreement between TTE and CMR ranged from -5.6 mm to + 1.0 mm for annulus size, from -0.45 mm to + 0.25 mm for LVOT, from -0.45 mm²to + 0.25 mm²for AVA and from -29.2% to 13.2% for LVEF.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>In elderly patients candidates to TAVI, CMR represents a viable complement to transthoracic echocardiography.</p

Long-Term Hemodynamic Performance of the Aortic Valve After David I: An Echocardiographic Study

Despite optimal hemodynamics at rest, the performance of the aortic valve under stress conditions long after David I procedure is still debated. From 2001-2014, 73 patients underwent reimplantation with David I technique. Aortic valve function of 13 patients (age 61.2 ± 8.72) with a follow-up of at least 5 years (6.3 ± 0.9 years) was assessed at exercise echocardiographic stress test on a stationary cycle. Patients who had undergone concomitant procedure, with recurrent aortic insufficiency or mitral valve incompetence, were excluded. In all, 8 healthy volunteers served as controls. Transvalvular gradients progressively increased during the steps in both groups (P-within < 0.001), being higher in David patients (P-between < 0.001), but never reaching a clinical significance (David Peak gradient 23.8 ± 9.3 mmHg; Mean gradient 13.2 ± 5.1 mmHg). Effective orifice area (EOA) and EOA index did not change during the test in David patients, whereas Controls showed a progressive increase of functional valve area to a peak at 50 W (Controls EOA 4.0 ± 0.5 cm(2); EOA index 2.0 ± 0.3 cm(2)/m(2)). In conclusion, David I procedure ensures good hemodynamics during high-flow conditions at long-term follow-up. The reimplantation of the functional aortic annulus inside a rigid tube determines a paradoxical reduction of functional aortic valve area, secondary to the increased stroke volume, without any clinically relevant increase in transvalvular gradients. These data confirm the reliability of David I in the long term, even under physical stress conditions

Myocardial fibrosis in aortic stenosis: comparison between clinical data, laboratory, echocardiography, and cardiac magnetic resonance

Introduction: Patients with aortic stenosis often develop hypertrophy and fibrosis, regardless of symptoms. Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) represents the gold standard for the evaluation of fibrosis despite numerous limitations: cost, availability, atrial fibrillation, claustrophobia, kidney failure or inability to apnea.Purpose: The aim is to validate the role of echocardiographic parameters, such as Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS), as early markers of fibrosis. Clinical and laboratory data, particularly B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP), were also analyzed.Material and methods: In our study we recruited 33 patients with severe aortic stenosis, correlating echocardiographic values of GLS with the qualitative analysis of Late Gadolinium Enhancement (LGE) and the quantitative analysis of T1 mapping of CMR.Results: 70% of patients with an alteration of GLS had LGE+. Univariate logistic regression shows that the factors associated with the presence of LGE on CMR are hypertension (p = 0.043), GLS (p = 0.032), and elevated BNP values (p = 0.021); for GLS, Odds Ratio (OR) is 5 so the chance of finding fibrosis on CMR increases 5 times in presence of an altered GLS. The multivariate analysis confirms the association with impaired GLS values (p = 0.033) and hypertension (p = 0.025), but not with elevated Pro-BNP values.Conclusion: In patients with severe aortic stenosis, the association between GLS, LGE, and T1 mapping can help identify earlier those patients with structural changes caused by the disease, who could benefit from early intervention. It remains to be established how the presence of these alterations has a role in determining the intervention time and the outcome of these patients

Ministernotomy versus full sternotomy aortic valve replacement with a sutureless bioprosthesis: A multicenter study

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to analyze early postoperative outcomes and 2-year survival after aortic valve replacement (AVR) with the sutureless Perceval bioprosthesis (Sorin Biomedica Cardio Srl, Salluggia, Italy) performed through ministernotomy compared with full sternotomy. METHODS: This was a study of 267 consecutive patients who underwent isolated AVR with the sutureless Perceval bioprosthesis between 2007 and 2014 at 6 European centers. Of these, 189 (70.8%) were performed through ministernotomy and 78 through a full sternotomy. Propensity score matching was used to reduce selection bias. RESULTS: In the overall cohort of ministernotomy and full sternotomy patients, in-hospital mortality was 1.1% and 2.6% and 2-year survival was 92% and 91%, respectively. Propensity score matching resulted in 56 pairs with similar characteristics and operative risk. Aortic cross-clamp (44 minutes in both groups, p = 0.931) and cardiopulmonary bypass time (69 vs 74 minutes, p = 0.363) did not differ between the groups. Apart from higher values in the ministernotomy group for postoperative peak gradients (28.1 vs 23.3 mm Hg, p = 0.026) and mean aortic valve gradients (15.2 vs 11.7 mm Hg, p = 0.011), early postoperative outcomes did not differ in the propensity-matched cohort. There were no differences in the in-hospital mortality rate or 2-year survival between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: AVR with the sutureless Perceval bioprosthesis through a ministernotomy was a safe and reproducible procedure that was not associated with prolonged aortic cross-clamp or cardiopulmonary bypass time compared with a full sternotomy. Early postoperative outcomes and 2-year survival were comparable between patients undergoing ministernotomy and full sternotomy

Early and intermediate outcome after aortic valve replacement with a sutureless bioprosthesis: Results of a multicenter study

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of aortic valve replacement with the sutureless Perceval S aortic valve bioprosthesis (Sorin Biomedica Cardio Srl, Saluggia, Italy). METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of 314 patients (mean age, 77.9 ± 5.0 years, mean European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II, 9.0% ± 7.6%) who underwent aortic valve replacement with the Perceval S valve with (94 patients) or without (220 patients) concomitant coronary artery bypass surgery at 5 European centers. RESULTS: The Perceval S valve was successfully implanted in all but 1 patient (99.7%). The mean aortic crossclamping time was 43 ± 20 minutes (isolated procedure, 39 ± 15 minutes; concomitant coronary surgery, 52 ± 26 minutes). Severe paravalvular leak occurred in 2 patients (0.6%). In-hospital mortality was 3.2% (1.4% after isolated procedure and 7.4% after concomitant coronary surgery). In-hospital mortality was 2.8% and 4.0% among patients with a European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II less than 10% and 10% or greater, respectively (P = .558). Octogenarians had slightly higher in-hospital mortality (5.2% vs 2.0%, P = .125; after isolated procedure: 2.7% vs 0.7%, P = .223; after concomitant coronary surgery: 9.5% vs 5.8%, P = .491) compared with younger patients. Full sternotomy did not increase the in-hospital mortality risk compared with ministernotomy or minithoracotomy access (1.3% vs 1.4%, when adjusted for baseline covariates: P = .921; odds ratio, 0.886; 95% confidence interval, 0.064-12.346). One-year survival was 90.5%. Freedom from valve-related mortality, stroke, endocarditis, and reoperation was 99.0%, 98.1%, 99.2%, and 98.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The sutureless Perceval S valve is associated with excellent early survival in high-risk patients, particularly among those undergoing an isolated procedure. Further studies are needed to prove the durability of this bioprosthesis

Ministernotomy versus full sternotomy aortic valve replacement with a sutureless bioprosthesis: a multicenter study

The aim of this study was to analyze early postoperative outcomes and 2-year survival after aortic valve replacement (AVR) with the sutureless Perceval bioprosthesis (Sorin Biomedica Cardio Srl, Salluggia, Italy) performed through ministernotomy compared with full sternotomy.status: publishe

Aortic valve replacement through full sternotomy with a stented bioprosthesis versus minimally invasive sternotomy with a sutureless bioprosthesis

The aim of this study was to analyse early postoperative outcomes and 2-year survival after aortic valve replacement (AVR) through a ministernotomy with a sutureless bioprosthesis implantation compared with a full sternotomy with implantation of a stented bioprosthesis.status: publishe

Aortic valve replacement through full sternotomy with a stented bioprosthesis versus minimally invasive sternotomy with a sutureless bioprosthesis

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to analyze early postoperative outcomes and 2-year survival after aortic valve replacement (AVR) with the sutureless Perceval bioprosthesis (Sorin Biomedica Cardio Srl, Salluggia, Italy) performed through ministernotomy compared with full sternotomy. METHODS: This was a study of 267 consecutive patients who underwent isolated AVR with the sutureless Perceval bioprosthesis between 2007 and 2014 at 6 European centers. Of these, 189 (70.8%) were performed through ministernotomy and 78 through a full sternotomy. Propensity score matching was used to reduce selection bias. RESULTS: In the overall cohort of ministernotomy and full sternotomy patients, in-hospital mortality was 1.1% and 2.6% and 2-year survival was 92% and 91%, respectively. Propensity score matching resulted in 56 pairs with similar characteristics and operative risk. Aortic cross-clamp (44 minutes in both groups, p = 0.931) and cardiopulmonary bypass time (69 vs 74 minutes, p = 0.363) did not differ between the groups. Apart from higher values in the ministernotomy group for postoperative peak gradients (28.1 vs 23.3 mm Hg, p = 0.026) and mean aortic valve gradients (15.2 vs 11.7 mm Hg, p = 0.011), early postoperative outcomes did not differ in the propensity-matched cohort. There were no differences in the in-hospital mortality rate or 2-year survival between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: AVR with the sutureless Perceval bioprosthesis through a ministernotomy was a safe and reproducible procedure that was not associated with prolonged aortic cross-clamp or cardiopulmonary bypass time compared with a full sternotomy. Early postoperative outcomes and 2-year survival were comparable between patients undergoing ministernotomy and full sternotomy