Studies of CP-conserving and CP-violating Bs mixing parameters with the D0 experiment

This paper summarises the recent results of the Run IIa D0 experiment at the Tevatron Collider at Fermilab on the observable parameters of the $B_{s}$ meson. A measurement of the branching fraction $B_s->D_s^{(*)}D_s^{(*)}$ is reported, which provides an estimate of the width difference $\Delta\Gamma_{s}^{CP}/\Delta\Gamma_{s}$. Through the decay $B_{s} \to J/\psi \phi$ the width difference $\Delta\Gamma_{s}$ is extracted, and for the first time a constraint is set on the CP-violating phase $\phi_{s}$, although a four-fold ambiguity remains. This result is combined with other D0 measurements to yield $\Delta\Gamma_{s}=0.13\pm0.09 {\rm ps^{-1}}$, $\phi_{s} = -0.70^{+0.47}_{-0.39}$.Comment: Submitted for the SUSY07 proceeding

Structuring and support by Alfven waves around prestellar cores

Observations of molecular clouds show the existence of starless, dense cores, threaded by magnetic fields. Observed line widths indicate these dense condensates to be embedded in a supersonically turbulent environment. Under these conditions, the generation of magnetic waves is inevitable. In this paper, we study the structure and support of a 1D plane-parallel, self-gravitating slab, as a monochromatic, circularly polarized Alfven wave is injected in its central plane. Dimensional analysis shows that the solution must depend on three dimensionless parameters. To study the nonlinear, turbulent evolution of such a slab, we use 1D high resolution numerical simulations. For a parameter range inspired by molecular cloud observations, we find the following. 1) A single source of energy injection is sufficient to force persistent supersonic turbulence over several hydrostatic scale heights. 2) The time averaged spatial extension of the slab is comparable to the extension of the stationary, analytical WKB solution. Deviations, as well as the density substructure of the slab, depend on the wave-length of the injected wave. 3) Energy losses are dominated by loss of Poynting-flux and increase with increasing plasma beta. 4) Good spatial resolution is mandatory, making similar simulations in 3D currently prohibitively expensive.Comment: 13 pages, 8 figures, accepted for publication in A&A. The manuscript with full color, high-resolution, figures can be downloaded from http://www.astro.phys.ethz.ch/papers/folini/folini_p_nf.htm

Accuracy requirements to test the applicability of the random cascade model to supersonic turbulence

A model, which is widely used for inertial rang statistics of supersonic turbulence in the context of molecular clouds and star formation, expresses (measurable) relative scaling exponents Z_p of two-point velocity statistics as a function of two parameters, beta and Delta. The model relates them to the dimension D of the most dissipative structures, D=3-Delta/(1-beta). While this description has proved most successful for incompressible turbulence (beta=Delta=2/3, and D=1), its applicability in the highly compressible regime remains debated. For this regime, theoretical arguments suggest D=2 and Delta=2/3, or Delta=1. Best estimates based on 3D periodic box simulations of supersonic isothermal turbulence yield Delta=0.71 and D=1.9, with uncertainty ranges of Delta in [0.67, 0.78] and D in [2.04,1.60]. With these 5-10\% uncertainty ranges just marginally including the theoretical values of Delta=2/3 and D=2, doubts remain whether the model indeed applies and, if it applies, for what values of beta and Delta. We use a Monte Carlo approach to mimic actual simulation data and examine what factors are most relevant for the fit quality. We estimate that 0.1% (0.05%) accurate Z_p, with p=1...5, should allow for 2% (1%) accurate estimates of beta and Delta in the highly compressible regime, but not in the mildly compressible regime. We argue that simulation-based Z_p with such accuracy are within reach of today's computer resources. If this kind of data does not allow for the expected high quality fit of beta and Delta, then this may indicate the inapplicability of the model for the simulation data. In fact, other models than the one we examine here have been suggested.Comment: 8 pages, 8 figures, accepted by Astronomy and Astrophysic