6 research outputs found

    Severe Chronic Venous Insufficiency: Magnitude of the Problem and Consequences

    Full text link
    The aim of this study was to characterize patients requiring hospitalization for severe chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) at the local and national levels and to analyze factors related to primary amputation. An administrative database (Nationwide Inpatient Sample, 1988-2000) and a single institution (1992-2000) were reviewed using the International Classification of Diseases, 9th ed., Clinical Modification , codes for CVI, excluding phlegmasia and concomitant peripheral vascular occlusive disease codes. Demographics, clinical course, and outcomes were assessed. Descriptive, univariate, and multivariate statistical analyses were used; p < 0.05 was considered significant. Nationally, CVI occurred with a mean incidence of 92/100,000 admissions, of which 55% were women, having a mean age of 65 years and a median length of stay of 7 days. Mean hospital charges were $13,900 and did not change significantly over time. Acute deep vein thrombosis affected 1.3%, amputation was performed in 1.2%, and in-hospital mortality was 1.6% The local cohort included 67 patients with a mean age of 51 years; a majority were men (60%), and 85% were C6 (of Clinical-Etiologic-Anatomic-Pathophysiology [CEAP]). Patients averaged 23 clinic visits and a median of one hospitalization for CVI care over a 44-month follow-up. Twelve patients (18%) underwent a CVI-related amputation (one transmetatarsal amputation, nine below-knee amputations, and two above-knee amputations). They had fourfold more CVI-related hospitalizations, greater preoperative chronic narcotic use than nonamputee patients (85% vs. 58%), but less ongoing wound care needs (25% vs. 89%) (all p values < 0.05). However, no significant difference in long-term mortality, number of clinic visits, duration of symptoms, antibiotic courses, or prior venous-related surgeries was found. In those with amputation, ambulatory status was maintained in 75% at 15-month follow-up. The physiological and economic costs of severe CVI are significant and have not decreased over more than a decade. Amputation for CVI-related nonhealing wounds has a reasonable outcome. Future therapy must focus on prevention of CVI sequelae.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/41369/1/10016_2005_Article_5425.pd

    Treatment of Gastric Adenocarcinoma May Differ Among Hospital Types in the United States, a Report from the National Cancer Data Base

    Get PDF
    The concept that complex surgical procedures should be performed at high-volume centers to improve surgical morbidity and mortality is becoming widely accepted. We wanted to determine if there were differences in the treatment of patients with gastric cancer between community cancer centers and teaching hospitals in the United States. Data from the 2001 Gastric Cancer Patient Care Evaluation Study of the National Cancer Data Base comprising 6,047 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma treated at 691 hospitals were assessed. The mean number of patients treated was larger at teaching hospitals (14/year) when compared to community centers (5–9/year) (p < 0.05). The utilization of laparoscopy and endoscopic ultrasonography were significantly more common at teaching centers (p < 0.01). Pathologic assessment of greater than 15 nodes was documented in 31% of specimen at community hospitals and 38% at teaching hospitals (p < 0.01). Adjusted for cancer stage, chemotherapy and radiation therapy were utilized with equal frequency at all types of treatment centers. The 30-day postoperative mortality was lowest at teaching hospitals (5.5%) and highest at community hospitals (9.9%) (p < 0.01). These data support previous publications demonstrating that patients with diseases requiring specialized treatment have lower operative mortality when treated at high-volume centers

    In-hospital mortality after stomach cancer surgery in Spain and relationship with hospital volume of interventions

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>There is no consensus about the possible relation between in-hospital mortality in surgery for gastric cancer and the hospital annual volume of interventions. The objectives were to identify factors associated to greater in-hospital mortality for surgery in gastric cancer and to analyze the possible independent relation between hospital annual volume and in-hospital mortality.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients discharged after surgery for stomach cancer during 2001–2002 in four regions of Spain using the Minimum Basic Data Set for Hospital Discharges. The overall and specific in-hospital mortality rates were estimated according to patient and hospital characteristics. We adjusted a logistic regression model in order to calculate the in-hospital mortality according to hospital volume.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>There were 3241 discharges in 144 hospitals. In-hospital mortality was 10.3% (95% CI 9.3–11.4). A statistically significant relation was observed among age, type of admission, volume, and mortality, as well as diverse secondary diagnoses or the type of intervention. Hospital annual volume was associated to Charlson score, type of admission, region, length of stay and number of secondary diagnoses registered at discharge. In the adjusted model, increased age and urgent admission were associated to increased in-hospital mortality. Likewise, partial gastrectomy (Billroth I and II) and simple excision of lymphatic structure were associated with a lower probability of in-hospital mortality. No independent association was found between hospital volume and in-hospital mortality</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Despite the limitations of our study, our results corroborate the existence of patient, clinical, and intervention factors associated to greater hospital mortality, although we found no clear association between the volume of cases treated at a centre and hospital mortality.</p

    Trends in Utilization of Adrenalectomy in the United States: Have Indications Changed?

    Full text link
    Minimally invasive approaches have dramatically reduced morbidity associated with adrenalectomy. There has been concern that an increased frequency of adrenal imaging along with the advantages of less morbidity could influence the indications for adrenalectomy. We tested the hypothesis that adrenalectomy has become more common over time and that benign diseases have been increasingly represented among procedural indications. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was utilized to determine the incidence of adrenalectomy and the associated surgical indications in the United States between 1988 and 2000. All discharged patients were identified whose primary ICD-9-CM procedure code was for adrenalectomy, regardless of the specific surgical approach (laparoscopic adrenalectomy was not reliably coded). This subset was then queried for associated ICD-9-CM diagnostic codes. Linear regression and t -tests were utilized to determine the significance of trends. The total number of adrenalectomies increased significantly, from 12.9 per 100,000 discharges in 1988 to 18.5 per 100,000 discharges in 2000 ( p = 0.000003). The total number of adrenalectomies with a primary ICD-9-CM code for malignant adrenal neoplasm did not increase significantly: from 1.2 per 100,000 discharges in 1988 to 1.6 per 100,000 discharges in 2000 ( p = 0.47). The total number of adrenalectomies with a primary ICD-9-CM diagnostic code for benign adrenal neoplasm increased significantly, from 2.8 per 100,000 discharges in 1988 to 4.8 per 100,000 discharges in 2000 ( p = 0.00002). The average percentage of adrenalectomies performed for malignant neoplasm was significantly higher during the period 1988–1993 when compared to 1994–2000 (11% vs. 9%; p = 0.002). The average percentage of adrenalectomies performed for benign neoplasm was significantly lower during 1988–1993 when compared to 1994–2000 (25% vs. 28%; p = 0.015). Adrenalectomy is being performed with increasing frequency. This is associated with an increase in the proportion of adrenalectomies performed for benign neoplasms. Assuming no significant change in disease prevalence during the study period, these data suggest that indications for adrenalectomy may have changed somewhat over that period.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/41300/1/268_2004_Article_7619.pd
    corecore