A framework to move forward on the path to eco-innovation in the construction industry: implications to improve firms´ sustainable orientation

This paper examines key aspects in the innovative behavior of the construction firms that determine their environmental orientation while innovating. Structural equation modeling was used and data of 222 firms retrieved from the Spanish Technological Innovation Panel (PITEC) for 2010 to analyse the drivers of environmental orientation of the construction firms during the innovation process. The results show that the environmental orientation is positively affected by the product and process orientation of construction firms during the innovation process. Furthermore, the positive relation between the importance of market information sources and environmental orientation, mediated by process and product orientation, is discussed. Finally, a model that explains these relations is proposed and validated. Results have important managerial implications for those companies worried about their eco-innovative focus as the types of actions and relations within firms most suitable for improving their eco-innovative orientation are highlighted.The authors would like to thank the Spanish Economy and Competitiveness Ministry for its support through the research project (EC02011-27369) and also the Universitat Politecnica de Valencia (SP20140647).Segarra Oña, MDV.; Peiró Signes, A.; Cervelló Royo, RE. (2015). A framework to move forward on the path to eco-innovation in the construction industry: implications to improve firms´ sustainable orientation. Science and Engineering Ethics. 21(6):1469-1484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9620-2S14691484216Amara, N., & Landry, R. (2005). Sources of information as determinants of novelty of innovation in manufacturing firms: evidence from the 1999 statistics Canada innovation survey. Technovation, 25(3), 245–259.Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two- step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.Ang, G. K. I. (2004). Competing revaluing construction paradigms in practice. Rotterdam: CIB.Audet, R., & Guyonnaud, M. F. (2013). Transition in practice and action in research. A French case study in piloting eco-innovations. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 26(4), 398–415.Bagozzi, R., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 18(1), 74–94.Barclay, D., Higgins, C., & Thompson, R. (1995). The partial least square (PLS) approach to causal modelling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technology Studies, Special Issue on Research Methodology, 2(2), 285–309.Barrett, P. (2007). Revaluing construction: A holistic model. Building Research and Information, 35(3), 268–286.Barrett, P., & Lee, A. (2005). Revaluing construction: A CIB priority theme, Salford Centre for Research and Innovation. Salford/CIB: University of Salford, Rotterdam.Beamon, B. M. (2005). Environmental and sustainability ethics in supply chain management. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11(2), 221–234.Burciu, A., Bostan, I., Condrea, P., & Grosu, V. (2010). Financing the environmental policies in the communitarian space. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 9(9), 1179–1185.Carrascosa-López, C., Peiró-Signes, Á., & Segura-García-del-Río, B. (2012). Does it pay to be greener than legislation? An empirical study of spanish tile industry. Journal of Sustainable Development, 5(5), 17–26.Carter, T., & Fowler, L. (2008). Establishing green roof infrastructure through environmental policy instruments. Environmental Management, 42(1), 151–164.Cervelló-Royo, R., Garrido-Yserte, R., & Segura-García del Río, B. (2012). An urban regeneration model in heritage areas in search of sustainable urban development and internal cohesion. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 2(1), 44–61.Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–358). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003). A partial least squares latent variable modelling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 189–217.Commission, European. (2004). Facing the challenge: The Lisbon strategy for growth and employment Brussels. Brussels: European Comission.Commission of the European Communities (2006). Action Plan for Energy Efficiency: Realising the Potential, Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/energy/action_plan_energy_efficiency/doc/com_2006_0545_en.pdf . (Accessed 31/01/2014).Courtney, R., & Winch, G. (2002). CIB strategy for re-engineering construction. Rotterdam: CIB.Courtney, R., & Winch, G. M. (2003). Re-engineering construction: The role of research and implementation. Building Research and Information, 31(2), 172–178.Davis, M. (2001). The professional approach to engineering ethics: Five research questions. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7, 379–390.Ding, G. K. C. (2008). Sustainable construction. The role of environmental assessment tools. Journal of Environmental Management, 86(3), 451–464.Du Plessis, C., & Cole, R. J. (2011). Motivating change: Shifting the paradigm. Building Research and Information, 39(5), 436–449.Esty, D. C., & Winston, A. S. (2006). Green to gold, how smart companies use environmental strategy to innovate, create value, and build competitive advantage. Hoboken: Wiley.European Commission (2010) Europe 2020: A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, Brussels.Falk, R., & Miller, N. (1992). A primer on soft modelling. Akron: The University of Akron Press.Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 328–388.Freeman, R. E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 409–422.Gázquez-Abad, J. C., Huertas-García, R., Vázquez-Gómez, M. D., & Romeo, A. C. (2014). Drivers of sustainability strategies in Spain’s wine tourism industry. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 1938965514549657.Gebauer, H., Gustafsson, A., & Witell, L. (2011). Competitive advantage through service differentiation by manufacturing companies. Journal of Business Research, 64(12), 1270–1280.Geisser, S. (1975). A predictive approach to the random effect model. Biometrika, 61(1), 101–107.González-Benito, O., & González-Benito, J. (2008). Implications of market orientation on the environmental transformation of industrial firms. Ecological Economics, 64(4), 752–762.Henseler, J., Ringle, C., & Sinkovics, R. (2009). The use of partial least square path modelling in international marketing. In I. Rudolf, R. Sinkovics & N. Pervez (Eds.), Advance in international marketing (Vol. 20, pp. 277–319).Hill, S., & Lorenz, D. (2011). Rethinking professionalism: Guardianship of land and resources. Building Research and Information, 39(3), 314–319.Huedo, P., & Lopez-Mesa, B. (2013). Review of tools to assist in the selection of sustainable building assemblies. Informes de la Construcción, 65(529), 77–88.IPCC. (2007a). Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. summary for policymakers: Contribution of working group i to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Geneva: IPCC.IPCC. (2007b). Mitigation. contribution of working group III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Geneva: IPCC.Jensen, J. S., Gottlieb, S. C., & Thuese, C. L. (2011). Construction sector development: Frames and governance responses. Building Research and Information, 39(6), 665–667.Kibert, Ch J. (2007). The next generation of sustainable construction. Building Research & Information, 35(6), 595–601.Kim, Y., Brodhag, C., & Mebratu, D. (2014). Corporate social responsibility driven innovation. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 27(2), 175–196.Kuhn, S. (2001). Commentary on: The greening of engineers: A cross-cultural experience. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7(1), 123–124.Lam, P. T., Chan, E. H., Chau, C. K., Poon, C. S., & Chun, K. P. (2011). Environmental management system vs green specifications: How do they complement each other in the construction industry? Journal of Environmental Management, 92(3), 788–795.Leimeister, S., Leimeister, J. M., & Knebel, U. (2009). A cross-national comparison of perceived strategic importance of RFID for CIOs in Germany and Italy. International Journal of Information Management, 29(1), 37–47.Leman, A., & Bordass, B. (2007). Are users more tolerant of green buildings? Building Research and Information, 35(6), 662–673.Liefferink, D., & Andersen, M. S. (1998). Strategies of the green member states in EU environmental policy-making. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(2), 254–270.Losada, B. (2013). Smart cities through the smart grid: The sustainable smart city and its energy dependence. DYNA, 88(2), 154–155.Luetzkendorf, T. (2010). Sustainable properties-dream or trend? Informes de la Construcción, 61(517), 5–15.Lützkendorf, T., & Lorenz, D. (2007). Integrating sustainability into property risk assessments for market transformation. Building Research and Information, 35(6), 644–671.Matthyssensa, P., & Vandenbempt, K. (2008). Moving from basic offerings to value-added solutions: Strategies, barriers and alignment. Industrial Marketing Management, 37(3), 316–328.McKeiver, C., & Gadenne, D. (2005). Environmental management systems in small and medium business. Small Business Journal, 23(5), 513–537.Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1995). Teoría psicométrica. México: McGraw-Hill.Parsa, H. G., Segarra-Oña, M., Jang, S. S., Chen, R., & Singh, A. J. (2014). Special issue on sustainable and eco-innovative practices in hospitality and tourism. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 55(1), 5–5.Pearce, D. (2006). Is the construction sector sustainable? Building Research and Information, 34(3), 201–207.Peiró-Signes, A., Miret-Pastor, L. L., Segarra-Oña, M. V., & De Miguel Molina, B. (2013). Analysing the determinants of better performance through eco management tools at the food industry: An empirical study. In P. Golinska (Ed.), Eco Production and logistics (pp. 73–90). Heidelberg: Springer.Peiró-Signes, A., Verma, R., Mondéjar-Jiménez, J., & Vargas-Vargas, M. (2014). The impact of environmental certification on hotel guest ratings. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 55(1), 40–51.Petruzzelli, A. M., Dangelico, R. M., Rotolo, D., & Albino, V. (2011). Organizational factors and technological features in the development of green innovations: Evidence from patent analysis. Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, 13(3), 291–310.Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.Porter, M. E., & Van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118.Rennings, K. (2002). Redefining innovation—Eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 32(2), 319–332.Rennings, K., Ziegler, A., Ankele, K., & Hoffman, E. (2006). The influence of different characteristics of the eu environmental management and auditing scheme on technical environmental innovations and economic performance. Ecological Economics, 57(1), 45–59.Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Will, A. (2005). SmartPLS 2.0 M3. http:// www.smartpls.de .Sánchez-Ollero, J. L., García-Pozo, A., & Marchante-Mera, A. (2013). How does respect for the environment affect final prices in the hospitality sector? A hedonic pricing approach. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 55, 31–39.Schmidt, V. A., & Radaelli, C. M. (2004). Policy change and discourse in Europe: Conceptual and methodological issues. West European Politics, 27(2), 183–210.Segarra-Oña, M.D.V., M.Peiró-Signes, Á., Verma, R., & Miret-Pastor, L. (2012). Does environmental certification help the economic performance of hotels? Evidence from the spanish hotel industry. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 1938965512446417.Segarra-Oña, M. V., Peiró-Signes, A., Albors-Garrigós, J., & Miret-Pastor, P. (2011). Impact of innovative practices in environmentally focused firms: Moderating factors. International Journal of Environmental Research, 5(2), 425–434.Segarra-Oña, M. D. V., Peiró-Signes, A., & Mondéjar-Jiménez, J. (2013). Identifying variables affecting the proactive environmental orientation of firms: An empirical study. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 22(3), 873–880.Sharma, A., Thomas, D., & Konsynski, B. (2008). Strategic and institutional perspectives in the evaluation, adoption and early integration of radio frequency identification (RFID): An empirical investigation of current and potential adopters. Proceedings of the 41st Hawaii international conference on system science, Waikoloa, Big Island, Hawaii, USA (pp 407–420).Sigala, M. (2014). Customer involvement in sustainable supply chain management a research framework and implications in tourism. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 55(1), 76–88.Song, M., Peng, J., Liu, W., & An, Q. (2014). A PSBM model for environmental efficiency evaluation and its application. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 23(3), 893–900.Stern, N. (2006). The economics of climate change: The stern review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Stone, M. (1974). Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 36, 111–147.Stone, G. W., & Wakefield, K. L. (2000). Eco-orientation: An extension of market orientation in an environmental context. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 8(3), 21–31.Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V., Chatelin, J., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48(1), 159–205.Tse, R. Y. (2001). The implementation of EMS in construction firms: Case study in Hong Kong. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 3(2), 177–194.Turner, R. K. (2006). Sustainability auditing and assessment challenges. Building Research and Information, 34(3), 197–200.Van Bueren, E., & De Jong, J. J. (2007). Establishing sustainability: Policy successes and failures. Building Research and Information, 35(5), 543–556.Vanasupa, L., Chen, K. C., & Slivovsky, L. (2006). Global challenges as inspiration: A classroom strategy to foster social responsibility. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(2), 373–380.Vastag, G., Kerekes, S., & Rondinelli, D. A. (1996). Evaluation of corporate environmental management approaches: A framework and application. International Journal of Production Economics, 43(2–3), 193–211

Comparing microbiotas in the upper aerodigestive and lower respiratory tracts of lambs

Abstract Background Recently, the importance of the lung microbiota during health and disease has been examined in humans and in small animal models. Whilst sheep have been proposed as an appropriate large animal model for studying the pathophysiology of a number of important human respiratory diseases, it is clearly important to continually define the limits of agreement between these systems as new concepts emerge. In humans, it has recently been established that the lung microbiota is seeded by microbes from the oral cavity. We sought to determine whether the same was true in sheep. Results We took lung fluid and upper aerodigestive tract (oropharyngeal) swab samples from 40 lambs (7 weeks old). DNA extraction was performed, and the V2-V3 region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified by PCR then sequenced via Illumina Miseq. Oropharyngeal swabs were either dominated by bacteria commonly associated with the rumen or by bacteria commonly associated with the upper aerodigestive tract. Lung microbiota samples did not resemble either the upper aerodigestive tract samples or reagent-only controls. Some rumen-associated bacteria were found in lung fluids, indicating that inhalation of ruminal bacteria does occur. We also identified several bacteria which were significantly more abundant in lung fluids than in the upper aerodigestive tract swabs, the most predominant of which was classified as Staphylococcus equorum. Conclusions In contrast to humans, we found that the lung microbiota of lambs is dissimilar to that of the upper aerodigestive tract, and we suggest that this may be related to physiological and anatomical differences between sheep and humans. Understanding the comparative physiology and anatomy underlying differences in lung microbiota between species will provide a foundation upon which to interpret changes associated with disease and/or environment

Influence of eco-innovation on Indian manufacturing sector sustainable performance

Manufacturing firms are striving to improve their sustainable performance in order to satisfy multiple stakeholders. Eco-innovation is a promising approach that decreases environmental impact and helps firms to increase their business value. There are several antecedents which help the firms to innovate and improve their triple bottom line performance. Among the antecedents, management and innovative practices are directly related to eco-innovation. It is not well known what practices and innovations help the firms to eco-innovate as well as to improve sustainable performance. Hence, the research objective of this paper is to identify the suitable combination of management and innovative practices that help firms to eco-innovate as well as to achieve overall sustainable performance. The paper develops an eco-innovation conceptual model which relates the management and innovative practices (antecedents) and overall sustainable performance (consequences) of eco-innovation using institutional theory. Using Indian manufacturing sector’s empirical data and Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) approach, this paper determines the effect of eco-innovation’s antecedents and consequences. In the Indian context, this study suggests that the role of management practice is more significant towards eco-innovation than innovative practices. The results reflect practitioners’ view on how to increase innovation rate and to focus more on social aspects. The finding suggests that training on environmental related practices could tackle innovation and social aspects in the Indian manufacturing sector context