Comparative Functional Genomics of Salt Stress in Related Model and Cultivated Plants Identifies and Overcomes Limitations to Translational Genomics

One of the objectives of plant translational genomics is to use knowledge and genes discovered in model species to improve crops. However, the value of translational genomics to plant breeding, especially for complex traits like abiotic stress tolerance, remains uncertain. Using comparative genomics (ionomics, transcriptomics and metabolomics) we analyzed the responses to salinity of three model and three cultivated species of the legume genus Lotus. At physiological and ionomic levels, models responded to salinity in a similar way to crop species, and changes in the concentration of shoot Cl− correlated well with tolerance. Metabolic changes were partially conserved, but divergence was observed amongst the genotypes. Transcriptome analysis showed that about 60% of expressed genes were responsive to salt treatment in one or more species, but less than 1% was responsive in all. Therefore, genotype-specific transcriptional and metabolic changes overshadowed conserved responses to salinity and represent an impediment to simple translational genomics. However, ‘triangulation’ from multiple genotypes enabled the identification of conserved and tolerant-specific responses that may provide durable tolerance across species

Proposta de indicadores e padrões para a avaliação de qualidade da atenção hospitalar: o caso da asma brônquica Indicators and standards proposal for the evaluation of the quality of hospital care: the case for bronchial asthma

Este artigo tem por objetivos propor indicadores para a avaliação de qualidade da assistência hospitalar a pacientes com asma brônquica, através de critérios explícitos baseados em revisão bibliográfica. O problema central da atenção apontado pela bibliografia foi a existência de falhas na avaliação da gravidade da crise de asma, tanto por parte dos pacientes e familiares, como pelos profissionais de saúde de todos os níveis da atenção, resultando em sérias conseqüências não só para o paciente, como também para a sociedade em geral. No Brasil, de 1980 a 1990, ocorreram em média 2.000 óbitos por asma/ano, sendo cerca de 70% deles intra-hospitalares. O diagnóstico de asma foi a quarta causa de internação no Estado do Rio de Janeiro em 1993. Somente 12% dos 81 casos que foram a óbito fizeram uso de UTI. Essas informações justificam uma avaliação mais apurada da assistência hospitalar a essa doença, e, como contribuição para o processo de avaliação, propomos a realização de revisão da internação de todos os casos que resultaram em óbito e revisão esporádica de uma amostra das internações. Os critérios propostos são: avaliação da gravidade da crise, avaliação da terapia medicamentosa prescrita, educação do paciente e/ou familiares e agendamento de consulta pós-alta hospitalar.<br>The objectives of this article are to propose indicators for evaluation of the quality of hospital management of bronchial asthma patients, based on explicit criteria from literature reviews. The central problem identified in the literature review is the erroneous evaluation of severity of asthma crises, either by patients and their relatives, or by health professionals at all levels of care, causing serious consequences not only for the patient, but for society as a whole. Mortality figures indicate that from 1980 to 1990, an average of 2000 deaths per year from asthma occurred in Brazil, of which 70% occurred in hospital. Asthma was the fourth cause of hospitalization (hospital admissions), in the state of Rio de Janeiro in 1993. Only 12% of the admissions that resulted in death made use of the ICU. The above information highlights the need for a thorough evaluation of hospital care of bronchial asthma in Brazil, including a review of all admissions resulting in death and reviews of a sample of all bronchial asthma admissions. Proposed criteria are for this evaluation include: severity of the crise, treatment prescribed, information given to the patient and their relatives, and follow-up appointments made after discharge from hospital

Prophylactic biological mesh reinforcement versus standard closure of stoma site (ROCSS): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial

Background: Closure of an abdominal stoma, a common elective operation, is associated with frequent complications; one of the commonest and impactful is incisional hernia formation. We aimed to investigate whether biological mesh (collagen tissue matrix) can safely reduce the incidence of incisional hernias at the stoma closure site. Methods: In this randomised controlled trial (ROCSS) done in 37 hospitals across three European countries (35 UK, one Denmark, one Netherlands), patients aged 18 years or older undergoing elective ileostomy or colostomy closure were randomly assigned using a computer-based algorithm in a 1:1 ratio to either biological mesh reinforcement or closure with sutures alone (control). Training in the novel technique was standardised across hospitals. Patients and outcome assessors were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome measure was occurrence of clinically detectable hernia 2 years after randomisation (intention to treat). A sample size of 790 patients was required to identify a 40% reduction (25% to 15%), with 90% power (15% drop-out rate). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02238964. Findings: Between Nov 28, 2012, and Nov 11, 2015, of 1286 screened patients, 790 were randomly assigned. 394 (50%) patients were randomly assigned to mesh closure and 396 (50%) to standard closure. In the mesh group, 373 (95%) of 394 patients successfully received mesh and in the control group, three patients received mesh. The clinically detectable hernia rate, the primary outcome, at 2 years was 12% (39 of 323) in the mesh group and 20% (64 of 327) in the control group (adjusted relative risk [RR] 0·62, 95% CI 0·43–0·90; p=0·012). In 455 patients for whom 1 year postoperative CT scans were available, there was a lower radiologically defined hernia rate in mesh versus control groups (20 [9%] of 229 vs 47 [21%] of 226, adjusted RR 0·42, 95% CI 0·26–0·69; p<0·001). There was also a reduction in symptomatic hernia (16%, 52 of 329 vs 19%, 64 of 331; adjusted relative risk 0·83, 0·60–1·16; p=0·29) and surgical reintervention (12%, 42 of 344 vs 16%, 54 of 346: adjusted relative risk 0·78, 0·54–1·13; p=0·19) at 2 years, but this result did not reach statistical significance. No significant differences were seen in wound infection rate, seroma rate, quality of life, pain scores, or serious adverse events. Interpretation: Reinforcement of the abdominal wall with a biological mesh at the time of stoma closure reduced clinically detectable incisional hernia within 24 months of surgery and with an acceptable safety profile. The results of this study support the use of biological mesh in stoma closure site reinforcement to reduce the early formation of incisional hernias. Funding: National Institute for Health Research Research for Patient Benefit and Allergan