Differences in pregnancy outcomes in donor egg frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles following preimplantation genetic screening (PGS): a single center retrospective study

PURPOSE: This study aims to test the hypothesis, in a single-center retrospective analysis, that live birth rates are significantly different when utilizing preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) compared to not utilizing PGS in frozen–thawed embryo transfers in our patients that use eggs from young, anonymous donors. The question therefore arises of whether PGS is an appropriate intervention for donor egg cycles. METHODS: Live birth rates per cycle and live birth rates per embryo transferred after 398 frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles were examined from patients who elected to have PGS compared to those who did not. Blastocysts derived from donor eggs underwent trophectoderm biopsy and were tested for aneuploidy using array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) or next-generation sequencing (NGS), then vitrified for future use (test) or were vitrified untested (control). Embryos were subsequently warmed and transferred into a recipient or gestational carrier uterus. Data was analyzed separately for single embryo transfer (SET), double embryo transfer (DET), and for own recipient uterus and gestational carrier (GC) uterus recipients. RESULTS: Rates of implantation of embryos leading to a live birth were significantly higher in the PGS groups transferring two embryos (DET) compared to the no PGS group (GC, 72 vs. 56 %; own uterus, 60 vs. 36 %). The live birth implantation rate in the own uterus group for SET was higher in the PGS group compared to the control (58 vs. 36 %), and this almost reached significance but the live birth implantation rate for the SET GC group remained the same for both tested and untested embryos. Live births per cycle were nominally higher in the PGS GC DET and own uterus SET and DET groups compared to the non-PGS embryo transfers. These differences almost reached significance. The live birth rate per cycle in the SET GC group was almost identical. CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences were noted only for DET; however, benefits need to be balanced against risks associated with multiple pregnancies. Results observed for SET need to be confirmed on larger series and with randomized cohorts

Chromosomal Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis: 25 Years and Counting.

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), first successfully carried out in humans in the early 1990s, initially involved the PCR sexing of embryos by Y- (and later also X-) chromosome specific detection. Because of the problems relating to misdiagnosis and contamination of this technology however the PCR based test was superseded by a FISH-based approach involving X and Y specific probes. Sexing by FISH heralded translocation screening, which was shortly followed by preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) for Aneuploidy. Aneuploidy is widely accepted to be the leading cause of implantation failure in assisted reproductive technology (ART) and a major contributor to miscarriage, especially in women of advanced maternal age. PGS (AKA PGD for aneuploidy PGD-A) has had a chequered history, with conflicting lines of evidence for and against its use. The current practice of trophectoderm biopsy followed by array CGH or next generation sequencing is gaining in popularity however as evidence for its efficacy grows. PGS has the potential to identify viable embryos that can be transferred thereby reducing the chances of traumatic failed IVF cycles, miscarriage or congenital abnormalities and facilitating the quickest time to live birth of chromosomally normal offspring. In parallel to chromosomal diagnoses, technology for PGD has allowed for improvements in accuracy and efficiency of the genetic screening of embryos for monogenic disorders. The number of genetic conditions available for screening has increased since the early days of PGD, with the human fertilization and embryology authority currently licensing 419 conditions in the UK [1]. A novel technique known as karyomapping that involves SNP chip screening and tracing inherited chromosomal haploblocks is now licensed for the PGD detection of monogenic disorders. Its potential for the universal detection of chromosomal and monogenic disorders simultaneously however, has yet to be realized

Chromosomal Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis: 25 Years and Counting.

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), first successfully carried out in humans in the early 1990s, initially involved the PCR sexing of embryos by Y- (and later also X-) chromosome specific detection. Because of the problems relating to misdiagnosis and contamination of this technology however the PCR based test was superseded by a FISH-based approach involving X and Y specific probes. Sexing by FISH heralded translocation screening, which was shortly followed by preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) for Aneuploidy. Aneuploidy is widely accepted to be the leading cause of implantation failure in assisted reproductive technology (ART) and a major contributor to miscarriage, especially in women of advanced maternal age. PGS (AKA PGD for aneuploidy PGD-A) has had a chequered history, with conflicting lines of evidence for and against its use. The current practice of trophectoderm biopsy followed by array CGH or next generation sequencing is gaining in popularity however as evidence for its efficacy grows. PGS has the potential to identify viable embryos that can be transferred thereby reducing the chances of traumatic failed IVF cycles, miscarriage or congenital abnormalities and facilitating the quickest time to live birth of chromosomally normal offspring. In parallel to chromosomal diagnoses, technology for PGD has allowed for improvements in accuracy and efficiency of the genetic screening of embryos for monogenic disorders. The number of genetic conditions available for screening has increased since the early days of PGD, with the human fertilization and embryology authority currently licensing 419 conditions in the UK [1]. A novel technique known as karyomapping that involves SNP chip screening and tracing inherited chromosomal haploblocks is now licensed for the PGD detection of monogenic disorders. Its potential for the universal detection of chromosomal and monogenic disorders simultaneously however, has yet to be realized

Methods for comprehensive chromosome screening of oocytes and embryos: capabilities, limitations, and evidence of validity

Preimplantation aneuploidy screening of cleavage stage embryos using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) may no longer be considered the standard of care in reproductive medicine. Over the last few years, there has been considerable development of novel technologies for comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS) of the human genome. Among the notable methodologies that have been incorporated are whole genome amplification, metaphase and array based comparative genomic hybridization, single nucleotide polymorphism microarrays, and quantitative real-time PCR. As these methods become more integral to treating patients with infertility, it is critical that clinicians and scientists obtain a better understanding of their capabilities and limitations. This article will focus on reviewing these technologies and the evidence of their validity

Differing molecular response of young and advanced maternal age human oocytes to IVM.

Study questionWhat effect does maternal age have on the human oocyte's molecular response to in vitro oocyte maturation?Summary answerAlthough polyadenylated transcript abundance is similar between young and advanced maternal age (AMA) germinal vesicle (GV) oocytes, metaphase II (MII) oocytes exhibit a divergent transcriptome resulting from a differential response to in vitro oocyte maturation.What is known alreadyMicroarray studies considering maternal age or maturation stage have shown that either of these factors will affect oocyte polyadenylated transcript abundance in human oocytes. However, studies considering both human oocyte age and multiple stages simultaneously are limited to a single study that examined transcript levels for two genes by qPCR. Thus, polyadenylated RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) could provide novel insight into age-associated aberrations in gene expression in GV and MII oocytes.Study design, size, durationThe effect of maternal age (longitudinal analysis) on polyadenylated transcript abundance at different stages was analyzed by examining single GV and single in vitro matured MII oocytes derived from five young (YNG; < 30 years; average age 26.8; range 20-29) and five advanced maternal age (AMA; ≥40 years; average age 41.6 years; range 40-43 years) patients. Thus, a total of 10 YNG (5 GV and 5 MII) and 10 AMA (5 GV and 5 MII) oocytes were individually processed for RNA-Seq analysis.Participants/materials, settings, methodsPatients undergoing infertility treatment at the Colorado Center for Reproductive Medicine (Lone Tree, CO, USA) underwent ovarian stimulation with FSH and received hCG for final follicular maturation prior to ultrasound guided oocyte retrieval. Unused GV oocytes obtained at retrieval were donated for transcriptome analysis. Single oocytes were stored (at -80°C in PicoPure RNA Extraction Buffer; Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) immediately upon verification of immaturity or after undergoing in vitro oocyte maturation (24 h incubation), representing GV and MII samples, respectively. After isolating RNA and generating single oocyte RNA-Seq libraries (SMARTer Ultra Low Input RNA HV kit; Clontech, USA), Illumina sequencing (100 bp paired-end reads on HiSeq 2500) and bioinformatics analysis (CLC Genomics Workbench, DESeq2, weighted gene correlation network analysis (WGCNA), Ingenuity Pathway Analysis) were performed.Main results and the role of chanceA total of 12 770 genes were determined to be expressed in human oocytes (reads per kilobase per million mapped reads (RPKM) > 0.4 in at least three of five replicates for a minimum of one sample type). Differential gene expression analysis between YNG and AMA oocytes (within stage) identified 1 and 255 genes that significantly differed (adjusted P < 0.1 and log2 fold change >1) in polyadenylated transcript abundance for GV and MII oocytes, respectively. These genes included CDK1, NLRP5 and PRDX1, which have been reported to affect oocyte developmental potential. Despite the similarity in transcript abundance between GV oocytes irrespective of age, divergent expression patterns emerged during oocyte maturation. These age-specific differentially expressed genes were enriched (FDR < 0.05) for functions and pathways associated with mitochondria, cell cycle and cytoskeleton. Gene modules generated by WGCNA (based on gene expression) and patient traits related to oocyte quality (e.g. age and blastocyst development) were correlated (P < 0.05) and enriched (FDR < 0.05) for functions and pathways associated with oocyte maturation.Large scale dataRaw data from this study can be accessed through GSE95477.Limitations, reasons for cautionThe human oocytes used in the current study were obtained from patients with varying causes of infertility (e.g. decreased oocyte quality and oocyte quality-independent factors), possibly affecting oocyte gene expression. Oocytes in this study were retrieved at the GV stage following hCG administration and the MII oocytes were derived by IVM of patient oocytes. Although the approach has the benefit of identifying intrinsic differences between samples, it may not be completely representative of in vivo matured oocytes.Wider implications of the findingsTranscriptome profiles of YNG and AMA oocytes, particularly at the MII stage, suggest that aberrant transcript abundance may contribute to the age-associated decline in fertility.Study funding/competing interest(s)J.M.R. was supported by an Austin Eugene Lyons Fellowship awarded by the University of California, Davis. The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development of the National Institutes of Health (awarded to P.J.R.; R01HD070044) and the Fertility Laboratories of Colorado partly supported the research presented in this manuscript

Comment on Checa MA et al. J Assist Reprod Genet DOI 10.1007/s10815-009-9328-4

Comment in J Assist Reprod Genet. 2009 May;26(5):273-283.link_to_OA_fulltex

Clinical application of comprehensive chromosomal screening at the blastocyst stage.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a new strategy for comprehensive chromosome screening at the blastocyst stage. DESIGN: Clinical research study. SETTING: An IVF clinic and a specialist preimplantation genetic diagnosis laboratory. PATIENT(S): Forty-five infertile couples participated in the study. The mean maternal age was 37.7 years, and most couples had at least one previous unsuccessful IVF treatment cycle (mean 2.4). INTERVENTION(S): This study used a novel chromosome screening approach, combining biopsy of several trophectoderm cells on day 5 after fertilization and detailed analysis of all 24 types of chromosome using comparative genomic hybridization. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Proportion of embryos yielding a diagnostic result, aneuploidy rate, implantation rate, and pregnancy rate. RESULT(S): A diagnosis was obtained from 93.7% of embryos tested. The aneuploidy rate was 51.3%. The probability of an individual transferred embryo forming a pregnancy reaching the third trimester/birth was 68.9%, an implantation rate 50% higher than contemporary cycles from the same clinic. The pregnancy rate was 82.2%. CONCLUSION(S): The comprehensive chromosome screening method described overcomes many of the problems that limited earlier aneuploidy screening techniques and may finally allow preimplantation genetic screening to achieve the benefits predicted by theory. The high embryo implantation rate achieved is particularly encouraging and, if confirmed in subsequent studies, will be of great significance for IVF clinics attempting to reduce the number of embryos transferred or to implement single embryo transfer