Peracute Infection of Swine With Salmonella

It has recently been experimentally demonstrated that pigs exposed naturally to Salmonella on the floor of abattoir holding pens can become infected between two and six hours after being placed in the pens. In addition we have demonstrated that tonsillar tissue are almost immediately culture positive following such exposure under experimental conditions. The objective of this study was to determine the shortest amount of time necessary for infection of selected tissues and to determine if the tonsil served as a route for Salmonella entry into lymphoid tissues draining the tonsil. Forty-four Salmonella-negative, market age pigs (90 to 110 kg) were fasted overnight and exposed to approximately 2 X 106 Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium strain X4232 (nalidixic acid resistant). The bacteria were mixed with a fecal slurry and the slurry spread on the floor of the pens. Pigs were euthanized at 15, 30, 45, 60 and 120 minutes following initial exposure. Tonsil of the soft palate, medial retropharyngeal lymph node, ileocecal lymph node, a five centimeter section of the terminal ileum, cecal contents and 100 ml of blood were cultured for Salmonella. Strain X4232 was isolated from 98 % (43/44) of tonsils. Strain X4232 was isolated from the ileocecal lymph node within 45 minutes (2/9 pigs), terminal ileum within 15 minutes (1/9 pigs), cecal contents within 15 minutes (1/9 pigs), and blood within 45 minutes (1/9 pigs). Strain X4232 was not recovered from the medial retropharyngeal lymph node, indicating that the organism did not move rapidly into this node from the tonsil of the soft palate. Results of this study indicate that Salmonella can be recovered from selected tissues in market age swine in less than the normal two hour abattoir holding time

Gradient mapping of pattern ground characteristics from a photomosaic of the IBP tundra biome site near Barrow, Alaska

An air photographic mosaic covering an area of 44.5×10 5 m 2 was subdivided into 741 rectangular cells (60×100 m). Pattern frequency, center relief, shape, and wedge image clarity were tabulated using three states for each character on a nominal scale. These state variables were converted to an interval scale by the application of a spatial smoothing filter. The new values were subjected to a principal components analysis which indicated that a parsimonious classification of pattern spatial variation could be constructed by equally weighting the first three nominal variables (frequency, relief, shape). The maps derived from this scheme indicate the areas on the tundra surface where polygon evolution may be occurring at the present time.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/43203/1/11004_2005_Article_BF02082889.pd

Benevolent characteristics promote cooperative behaviour among humans

Cooperation is fundamental to the evolution of human society. We regularly observe cooperative behaviour in everyday life and in controlled experiments with anonymous people, even though standard economic models predict that they should deviate from the collective interest and act so as to maximise their own individual payoff. However, there is typically heterogeneity across subjects: some may cooperate, while others may not. Since individual factors promoting cooperation could be used by institutions to indirectly prime cooperation, this heterogeneity raises the important question of who these cooperators are. We have conducted a series of experiments to study whether benevolence, defined as a unilateral act of paying a cost to increase the welfare of someone else beyond one's own, is related to cooperation in a subsequent one-shot anonymous Prisoner's dilemma. Contrary to the predictions of the widely used inequity aversion models, we find that benevolence does exist and a large majority of people behave this way. We also find benevolence to be correlated with cooperative behaviour. Finally, we show a causal link between benevolence and cooperation: priming people to think positively about benevolent behaviour makes them significantly more cooperative than priming them to think malevolently. Thus benevolent people exist and cooperate more