27 research outputs found
Implementation and evaluation of different eradication strategies for Brachyspira hyodysenteriae
Background: Brachyspira infections are causing major losses to the pig industry and lead to high antimicrobial use. Treatment of Brachyspira (B.) hyodysenteriae infections may be problematic due to the high level of antimicrobial resistance. The present study implemented and evaluated farm-specific eradication programmes for B. hyodysenteriae in 10 different infected pig farms in Belgium.
Results: Ten pig farms clinically infected with B. hyodysenteriae volunteered to implement a farm-specific eradication programme. The programme depended on the farm and management characteristics, antimicrobial susceptibility of the B. hyodysenteriae strain and the motivation of the farmer. Two farms practiced total depopulation, six farms partial depopulation and two farms antimicrobial medication without depopulation. In addition, all farms implemented biosecurity measures, and faeces samples were tested for the presence of B. hyodysenteriae at 6, 9 and 12 months after the start of the program. Single Brachyspira isolates from before and after the programme were typed using multilocus sequence typing (MLST).
Eradication was successful in four farms. Two of them (farrow-to-finish and finishing herd) had applied total depopulation and respected a vacancy period of at least 3 weeks. A third farm (gilt farm) practised partial depopulation, the rooms remained empty for 28 days and changed the source of breeding gilts. The fourth farm practised partial depopulation, the stables remained empty for 3 weeks, and used antimicrobial medication. The eradication programme was not successful in six farms. Two of the latter farms only used medication without partial depopulation. Four farms practiced partial depopulation, one of them combined it with antimicrobial medication. The cleaning and disinfection procedures, rodent control, stand-empty period and/or other biosecurity measures in the six farms were not always implemented properly. In two of three farms, isolates belonging to the same MLST type were found before and after eradication.
Conclusions: Total depopulation or partial depopulation combined with implementing strict biosecurity measures allowed eradication of B. hyodysenteriae from clinically infected pig farms. Programmes based on antimicrobials without depopulation or partial depopulation without strictly adhering to all suggested biosecurity measures were not successful. Stockmanship and motivation of the farmer to permanently maintain high biosecurity standards are essential for success
Comparison of primary virus isolation in pulmonary alveolar macrophages and four different continuous cell lines for type 1 and type 2 porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus
Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus (PRRSV) has a highly restricted
cellular tropism. In vivo, the virus primarily infects tissue-specific macrophages in the nose, lungs,
tonsils, and pharyngeal lymphoid tissues. In vitro however, the MARC-145 cell line is one of the
few PRRSV susceptible cell lines that are routinely used for in vitro propagation. Previously, several
PRRSV non-permissive cell lines were shown to become susceptible to PRRSV infection upon
expression of recombinant entry receptors (e.g., PK15Sn-CD163, PK15S10-CD163). In the present study,
we examined the suitability of different cell lines as a possible replacement of primary pulmonary
alveolar macrophages (PAM) cells for isolation and growth of PRRSV. The susceptibility of four
different cell lines (PK15Sn-CD163, PK15S10-CD163, MARC-145, and MARC-145Sn) for the primary
isolation of PRRSV from PCR positive sera (both PRRSV1 and PRRSV2) was compared with that
of PAM. To find possible correlations between the cell tropism and the viral genotype, 54 field
samples were sequenced, and amino acid residues potentially associated with the cell tropism were
identified. Regarding the virus titers obtained with the five different cell types, PAM gave the
highest mean virus titers followed by PK15Sn-CD163, PK15S10-CD163, MARC-145Sn, and MARC-145.
The titers in PK15Sn-CD163 and PK15S10-CD163 cells were significantly correlated with virus titers in
PAM for both PRRSV1 (p < 0.001) and PRRSV2 (p < 0.001) compared with MARC-145Sn (PRRSV1:
p = 0.22 and PRRSV2: p = 0.03) and MARC-145 (PRRSV1: p = 0.04 and PRRSV2: p = 0.12). Further,
a possible correlation between cell tropism and viral genotype was assessed using PRRSV whole
genome sequences in a Genome-Wide-Association Study (GWAS). The structural protein residues
GP2:187L and N:28R within PRRSV2 sequences were associated with their growth in MARC-145.
The GP5:78I residue for PRRSV2 and the Nsp11:155F residue for PRRSV1 was linked to a higher
replication on PAM. In conclusion, PK15Sn-CD163 and PK15S10-CD163 cells are phenotypically closely
related to the in vivo target macrophages and are more suitable for virus isolation and titration than
MARC-145/MARC-145Sn cells. The residues of PRRSV proteins that are potentially related with cell
tropism will be further investigated in the future