Physician's attitudes towards diagnosing and treating glucocorticoid induced hyperglycaemia: Sliding scale regimen is still widely used despite guidelines

AbstractAimsTreatment with glucocorticoids for neoplasms and inflammatory disorders is frequently complicated by glucocorticoid induced hyperglycaemia (GCIH). GCIH is associated with adverse outcomes and its treatment has short term and long term benefits. Currently, treatment targets and modalities depend on local protocols and habits of individual clinicians. We explored current practice of screening and treatment of GCIH in patients receiving glucocorticoid pulse therapy.MethodsA factorial survey with written case vignettes. All vignette patients received glucocorticoid pulse therapy. Other characteristics (e.g., indication for glucocorticoid therapy, pre-existent diabetes) varied. The survey was held between November 2013 and May 2014 on 2 nationwide conferences and in hospitals across The Netherlands. Pulmonologists and internists expressed their level of agreement with statements on ordering capillary glucose testing and treatment initiation.ResultsRespondents ordered screening for GCIH in 85% of vignette patients and initiated treatment in 56%. When initiating treatment, respondents opt for sliding scale insulin in 62% of patients. Sliding scale insulin was more frequently prescribed in patients with pre-existent insulin dependent diabetes (OR 2.4, CI 1.3–4.2) and by residents (vs. specialists, OR 2.1, CI 1.2–3.5). Sixty-nine percent of clinicians experienced a lack of guidelines for GCIH.ConclusionsClinicians have a strong tendency to screen for GCIH but subsequent initiation of treatment was low. Sliding scale insulin is still widely used in episodic GCIH despite evidence against its effectiveness. This may be due to lacking evidence on feasible treatment options for GCIH

Hypoglycemia is associated with intensive care unit mortality

Contains fulltext : 90466.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)Objective: The implementation of intensive insulin therapy in the intensive care unit is accompanied by an increase in hypoglycemia. We studied the relation between hypoglycemia on intensive care unit mortality, because the evidence on this subject is conflicting. Design: Retrospective database cohort study. Setting: An 18-bed medical/surgical intensive care unit in a teaching hospital (Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). Patients: A total of 5961 patients admitted to from 2004 to 2007 were analyzed. Readmissions and patients with a withholding care policy or with hypoglycemia on the first glucose measurement were excluded. Patients were treated with a computerized insulin algorithm (target glucose range, 72-126 mg/dL). Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: All first episodes of hypoglycemia (glucose ≤45 mg/dL) were derived from 154,015 glucose values. Using Poisson regression, the incidence rates for intensive care unit death and incidence rate ratio comparing exposure and nonexposure to hypoglycemia were calculated. Patients were considered to be exposed to hypoglycemia from the event until the end of intensive care unit admittance. We corrected for severity of disease using the daily Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score. Age, sex, cardiothoracic surgery, sepsis, and diabetes mellitus were also included as possible confounders. Two hundred eighty-eight (4.8%) patients experienced at least one episode of hypoglycemia. Median age was 68 yrs (range, 58-75 yrs), 66% were male, and 6.4% died in the intensive care unit. The incidence rate of death in patients exposed to hypoglycemia was 40 per 1000 intensive care unit days compared with 17 per 1000 intensive care unit days in patients without exposure. The adjusted incidence rate ratio for intensive care unit death was 2.1 (95% confidence interval, 1.6-2.8; p < .001). Conclusions: Hypoglycemia is related to intensive care unit mortality, also when adjusted for a daily adjudicated measure of disease severity, indicating the possibility of a causal relationship

Efficacy and safety of two 5 day insulin dosing regimens to achieve strict glycaemic control in patients with acute ischaemic stroke

Background: In patients with acute ischaemic stroke and hyperglycaemia, prolonged strict glycaemic control may improve clinical outcome. The question is how to achieve this prolonged strict glycaemic control. In this study, the efficacy and safety of two regimens with different basal to meal related insulin ratio are described. Methods: 33 patients with ischaemic stroke and hyperglycaemia at admission were randomised in an open design to receive: (1) conventional glucose lowering therapy, (2) strict glucose control with predominantly basal insulin using intravenous insulin or (3) strict glucose control with predominantly meal related insulin using subcutaneous insulin in the first 5 days after stroke. The target range of glucose control for the last two groups was 4.4-6.1 mmol/l. 16 consecutive patients without hyperglycaemia at admission were included to serve as normoglycaemic controls. Results: The median area under the curve (AUC) in the meal related insulin group was 386 mmol/l x 58 h (range 286-662) for days 2-5, and did not differ from the hyperglycaemic control group (median AUC 444 mmol/l x 58 h; range 388-620). There was also no difference in median AUC of the basal insulin group (453 mmol/l x 58 h, range 347-629) and the hyperglycaemic control group on days 2-5. In the first 12 hours, glucose profiles were lower in the groups treated with strict glucose control; median AUC was 90 mmol/l x 12 h (range 77-189) for the hyperglycaemic control group versus 81 mmol/l x 12 h (range 60-118) for the meal related insulin group (p = 0.03) and 74 mmol/l x 12 h (range 52-97) for the basal insulin group (p = 0.008). Conclusion: In intermittently fed ischaemic stroke patients, strict glycaemic control between day 2 and day 5 with two different basal bolus regimens did not result in lower glucose profiles due to postprandial hyperglycaemia. Continuous enteral feeding may therefore be needed to achieve prolonged strict glycaemic control in acute stroke patient