Value of patient decision aids for shared decision-making in kidney failure

Background: It is unknown how often Dutch patient decision aids are used during kidney failure treatment modality education and what their impact is on shared decision-making. Objectives: We determined the use of Three Good Questions, ‘Overviews of options’, and Dutch Kidney Guide by kidney healthcare professionals. Also, we determined patient-experienced shared decision-making. Finally, we determined whether the experience of shared decision-making among patients changed after a training workshop for healthcare professionals. Design: Quality improvement study. Participants: Healthcare professionals answered questionnaires regarding education/patient decision aids. Patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate <20 mL/min/1.73 m2 completed shared decision-making questionnaires. Data were analysed with one-way analysis of variance and linear regression. Results: Of 117 healthcare professionals, 56% applied shared decision-making by discussing Three Good Questions (28%), ‘Overviews of options’ (31%–33%) and Kidney Guide (51%). Of 182 patients, 61%–85% was satisfied with their education. Of worst scoring hospitals regarding shared decision-making, only 50% used ‘Overviews of options’/Kidney Guide. Of best scoring hospitals 100% used them, needed less conversations (p = 0.05), provided information about all treatment options and more often provided information at home. After the workshop, patients' shared decision-making scores remained unchanged. Conclusions: The use of specifically developed patient decision aids during kidney failure treatment modality education is limited. Hospitals that did use them had higher shared decision-making scores. However, the degree of shared decision-making experienced by patients remained unchanged after healthcare professionals were trained on shared decision-making and the implementation of patient decision aids

Good practices for dialysis education, treatment, and eHealth: A scoping review

Background Recommendations regarding dialysis education and treatment are provided in various (inter)national guidelines, which should ensure that these are applied uniformly in nephrology and dialysis centers. However, there is much practice variation which could be explained by good practices: practices developed by local health care professionals, which are not evidence-based. Because an overview of good practices is lacking, we performed a scoping review to identify and summarize the available good practices for dialysis education, treatment, and eHealth. Methods Embase, Pubmed, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL databases and Web of Science were searched for relevant articles using all synonyms for the words 'kidney failure', 'dialysis', and 'good practice'. Relevant articles were structured according to the categories dialysis education, dialysis treatment or eHealth, and assessed for content and results. Results Nineteen articles (12 for dialysis education, 3 for dialysis treatment, 4 for eHealth) are identified. The good practices for education endorse the importance of providing complete and objective predialysis education, assisting peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients in adequately performing PD, educating hemodialysis (HD) patients on self-management, and talking with dialysis patients about their prognosis. The good practices for dialysis treatment focus mainly on dialysis access devices and general quality improvement of dialysis care. Finally, eHealth is useful for HD and PD and affects both quality of care and health-related quality of life. Conclusion Our scoping review identifies 19 articles describing good practices and their results for dialysis education, dialysis treatment, and eHealth. These good practices could be valuable in addition to guidelines for increasing shared-decision making in predialysis education, using patients' contribution in the implementation of their dialysis treatment, and advanced care planning. Copyright

Good practices for dialysis education, treatment, and eHealth: A scoping review

Background Recommendations regarding dialysis education and treatment are provided in various (inter)national guidelines, which should ensure that these are applied uniformly in nephrology and dialysis centers. However, there is much practice variation which could be explained by good practices: practices developed by local health care professionals, which are not evidence-based. Because an overview of good practices is lacking, we performed a scoping review to identify and summarize the available good practices for dialysis education, treatment, and eHealth. Methods Embase, Pubmed, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL databases and Web of Science were searched for relevant articles using all synonyms for the words 'kidney failure', 'dialysis', and 'good practice'. Relevant articles were structured according to the categories dialysis education, dialysis treatment or eHealth, and assessed for content and results. Results Nineteen articles (12 for dialysis education, 3 for dialysis treatment, 4 for eHealth) are identified. The good practices for education endorse the importance of providing complete and objective predialysis education, assisting peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients in adequately performing PD, educating hemodialysis (HD) patients on self-management, and talking with dialysis patients about their prognosis. The good practices for dialysis treatment focus mainly on dialysis access devices and general quality improvement of dialysis care. Finally, eHealth is useful for HD and PD and affects both quality of care and health-related quality of life. Conclusion Our scoping review identifies 19 articles describing good practices and their results for dialysis education, dialysis treatment, and eHealth. These good practices could be valuable in addition to guidelines for increasing shared-decision making in predialysis education, using patients' contribution in the implementation of their dialysis treatment, and advanced care planning. Copyright

Mesenchymal stromal/stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles promote human cartilage regeneration in vitro

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a rheumatic disease leading to chronic pain and disability with no effective treatment available. Recently, allogeneic human mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSC) entered clinical trials as a novel therapy for OA. Increasing evidence suggests that therapeutic efficacy of MSC depends on paracrine signalling. Here we investigated the role of extracellular vesicles (EVs) secreted by human bone marrow derived MSC (BMMSC) in human OA cartilage repair. Methods: To test the effect of BMMSC-EVs on OA cartilage inflammation, TNF-alpha-stimulated OA chondrocyte monolayer cultures were treated with BMMSC-EVs and pro-inflammatory gene expression was measured by qRT-PCR after 48 h. To assess the impact of BMMSC-EVs on cartilage regeneration, BMMSC-EVs were added to the regeneration cultures of human OA chondrocytes, which were analyzed after 4 weeks for glycosaminoglycan content by 1,9-dimethylmethylene blue (DMMB) assay. Furthermore, paraffin sections of the regenerated tissue were stained for proteoglycans (safranin-O) and type II collagen (immunostaining). Results: We show that BMMSC-EVs inhibit the adverse effects of inflammatory mediators on cartilage homeostasis. When co-cultured with OA chondrocytes, BMMSC-EVs abrogated the TNF-alpha-mediated upregulation of COX2 and pro-inflammatory interleukins and inhibited TNF-alpha-induced collagenase activity. BMMSC-EVs also promoted cartilage regeneration in vitro. Addition of BMMSC-EVs to cultures of chondrocytes isolated from OA patients stimulated production of proteoglycans and type II collagen by these cells. Conclusion: Our data demonstrate that BMMSC-EVs can be important mediators of cartilage repair and hold great promise as a novel therapeutic for cartilage regeneration and osteoarthritis

Impact of phosphate binders on quality of life in dialysis patients: Results from the prospective Dutch nOcturnal and hoME dialysis Study To Improve Clinical Outcomes study

Background: Phosphate binders cause high pill burden for dialysis patients, complicate medication regimens, and have unpleasant taste and large size which may affect patients' quality of life. This study explores the association between phosphate binder pill burden and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in dialysis patients. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional multi-centre cohort study in 21 Dutch dialysis centres. Phosphate binder pill burden was extracted from electronic patient records. Primary outcome was HRQoL measured with the Short Form 12 physical and mental component summary scores (PCS and MCS). Secondary endpoints were severity of gastro-intestinal symptoms, itching, dry mouth, and mental health symptoms, measured with the Dialysis Symptom Index. Results: Of 388 included patients, aged 62 ± 16 years, 77% underwent haemodialysis. PCS scores were comparable for patients with and without phosphate binders. Patients using 1–3 pills reported lower scores for decreased appetite (β −0.5; 95%CI −0.9 to −0.2), implying better appetite, than patients without phosphate binders. Patients using 4–6 pills also reported lower scores for decreased appetite (β −0.5; 95%CI −0.8 to −0.1) and for itching (β −0.5; 95%CI −0.9 to −0.1). Patients using >6 pills reported lower MCS (β −2.9; 95%CI −6.2–0.4) and higher scores for feeling nervous (β 0.6; 95%CI 0.1–1.1) and feeling sad (β 0.4; 95%CI 0.0–0.9). Conclusion: Phosphate binder pill burden is not associated with physical quality of life. A higher pill burden is associated with better appetite and less itching. Patients using >6 pills per day report lower mental quality of life and felt nervous and sad more often

Mental Wellbeing and General Health in Adolescents with Asthma: The PIAMA Birth Cohort Study.

Objectives To assess whether adolescents with asthma experience a lower mental well-being and lower general health than their peers without asthma. Study design Data from the Prevention and Incidence of Asthma and Mite Allergy study were used. At the ages of 11, 14, 17, and 20 years, 2651, 2522, 2094, and 2206 participants, respectively, completed questionnaires. Their parents completed questionnaires at the ages of 11 (n = 2660), 14 (n = 2338), and 17 years (n = 1872). Asthma was defined according to the Mechanisms of the Development of Allergy criteria. Mental well-being was measured using the Mental Health Index-5 and was reported by the adolescents. General health, measured on a 4-point Likert scale, was reported by the adolescents and their parents. We estimated associations of asthma with mental wellbeing and perceived general health using generalized estimating equations. Results At ages 11, 14, 17, and 20 years, 6.7%, 6.9%, 5.0%, and 6.6%, respectively, of the adolescents had asthma. Adolescents with asthma did not score differently on the Mental Health Index than their peers without asthma. Adolescents with asthma were less likely to experience good or excellent health than their peers without asthma (aOR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.26-0.51 for intermittent asthma and 0.33; 95% CI, 0.25-0.41 for persistent asthma). These results remain similar across the different ages. Conclusions The mental well-being of adolescents with asthma is similar to that of their peers without asthma, although adolescents with asthma are less likely to perceive a good or excellent general health

Mental Well-being and General Health in Adolescents with Asthma: The Prevention and Incidence of Asthma and Mite Allergy Birth Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether adolescents with asthma experience a lower mental well-being and lower general health than their peers without asthma. STUDY DESIGN: Data from the Prevention and Incidence of Asthma and Mite Allergy study were used. At the ages of 11, 14, 17, and 20 years, 2651, 2522, 2094, and 2206 participants, respectively, completed questionnaires. Their parents completed questionnaires at the ages of 11 (n = 2660), 14 (n = 2338), and 17 years (n = 1872). Asthma was defined according to the Mechanisms of the Development of Allergy criteria. Mental well-being was measured using the Mental Health Index-5 and was reported by the adolescents. General health, measured on a 4-point Likert scale, was reported by the adolescents and their parents. We estimated associations of asthma with mental well-being and perceived general health using generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: At ages 11, 14, 17, and 20 years, 6.7%, 6.9%, 5.0%, and 6.6%, respectively, of the adolescents had asthma. Adolescents with asthma did not score differently on the Mental Health Index than their peers without asthma. Adolescents with asthma were less likely to experience good or excellent health than their peers without asthma (aOR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.26-0.51 for intermittent asthma and 0.33; 95% CI, 0.25-0.41 for persistent asthma). These results remain similar across the different ages. CONCLUSIONS: The mental well-being of adolescents with asthma is similar to that of their peers without asthma, although adolescents with asthma are less likely to perceive a good or excellent general health