Diagnosis of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis with chest computed tomography:inter-observer agreement

To evaluate and improve the interobserver agreement for the CT-based diagnosis of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH). Six hundred participants of the CT arm of a lung cancer screening trial were randomly divided into two groups. The first 300 CTs were scored by five observers for the presence of DISH based on the original Resnick criteria for radiographs. After analysis of the data a consensus meeting was organised and the criteria were slightly modified regarding the definition of 'contiguous', the definition of 'flowing ossifications' and the viewing plane and window level. Subsequently, the second set of 300 CTs was scored by the same observers. kappa >= 0.61 was considered good agreement. The 600 male participants were on average 63.5 (SD 5.3) years old and had smoked on average 38.0 pack-years. In the first round kappa values ranged from 0.32 to 0.74 and 7 out of 10 values were below 0.61. After the consensus meeting the interobserver agreement ranged from 0.51 to 0.86 and 3 out of 10 values were below 0.61. The agreement improved significantly. This is the first study that reports interobserver agreement for the diagnosis of DISH on chest CT, showing mostly good agreement for modified Resnick criteria. . DISH is diagnosed on fluoroscopic and radiographic examinations using Resnick criteria . Evaluation of DISH on chest CT was modestly reproducible with the Resnick criteria . A consensus meeting and Resnick criteria modification improved inter-rater reliability for DISH . Reproducible CT criteria for DISH aids research into this poorly understood entity

Correction to: CT and MR imaging prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation: standardisation of scanning protocols, measurements and reporting—a consensus document by the European Society of Cardiovascular Radiology (ESCR)

The original version of this article, published on 05 September 2019, unfortunately contained a mistake. The image of “Jena Valve” in Table 3 was incorrect

Influenza season influence on outcome of new nodules in the NELSON study

We evaluated the impact of the influenza season on outcome of new lung nodules in a LDCT lung cancer screening trial population. NELSON-trial participants with ≥ 1 new nodule detected in screening rounds two and three were included. Outcome (resolution or persistence) of new nodules detected per season was calculated and compared. Winter (influenza season) was defined as 1st October to 31st March, and compared to the summer (hay-fever season), 1st April to 30th September. Overall, 820 new nodules were reported in 529 participants. Of the total new nodules, 482 (59%) were reported during winter. When considering the outcome of all new nodules, there was no statistically significant association between summer and resolving nodules (OR 1.07 [CI 1.00-1.15], p = 0.066), also when looking at the largest nodule per participant (OR 1.37 [CI 0.95-1.98], p = 0.094). Similarly, there was no statistically significant association between season and screen detected cancers (OR 0.47 [CI 0.18-1.23], p = 0.123). To conclude, in this lung cancer screening population, there was no statistically significant association between influenza season and outcome of new lung nodules. Hence, we recommend new nodule management strategy is not influenced by the season in which the nodule is detected.</p

Rising utilization of coronary CT angiography across Europe over the last decade: insights from a large prospective European registry

Abstract Background/Introduction The recently updated 2019 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes endorse the use of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for exclusion of obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with a low clinical likelihood (Class I, LOE B). Higher demand for CCTA requires broad availability, inevitably involving smaller healthcare providers, such as non-academic hospitals and private practices. Nevertheless, most published data on CCTA image quality and safety rely on exams performed in high-volume academic centers, and little is known about CCTA in non-academic settings. Purpose To investigate the utilization of CCTA across Europe over the last decade, focusing on differences between academic and non-academic centers. Methods We included patients with stable chest pain and suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) who received CCTA and were included in the European Society of Cardiovascular Radiology MR/CT registry 01/2010–01/2020. We compared CT equipment, image quality, radiation dose, the incidence of periprocedural adverse events, patient characteristics, and CCTA findings between academic (high volume university hospitals) and non-academic centers (non-academic hospitals and private practices). Results Overall, 64,317 patients (41.2% women; age 60±13 years) from 212 sites across 19 European countries were included. Academic centers submitted most cases in 2010—2014 (51.6%), whereas non-academic centers accounted for 71.3% of records in 2015–2020. While non-academic centers used less advanced technology, radiation dose remained low (4.54 [interquartile range (IQR) 2.28–6.76] mSv) with a 30% decline of high-dose scans (&gt;7 mSv) over time. Diagnostic image quality was reported in 97.7% of cases, and the rate of acute scan-related events was low (0.4%) (Figure 1). From 2010–2014 to 2015–2020, CCTA nearly doubled in patients with low to intermediate pretest-probability, women &gt;50, and 40–60 years old men (Figure 2). CAD presence and extent decreased slightly over time (prevalence: 2010–2014: 41.5% vs. 2015–2020: 40.6%), (multi-vessel disease in those with CAD: 2010–2014: 61.9% vs. 2015–2020: 55.9%; all p&lt;0.01). Conclusion CCTA expands rapidly to non-academic centers across Europe, increasing availability while maintaining relatively low radiation dose, high diagnostic image quality, and safety. Broad availability of high-quality CCTA is essential for a successfully implementation of the recently updated guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Changes in CCTA utilizationChanges in patient characteristic