6 research outputs found

    Aortic valve sclerosis is associatedwith systemic endothelial dysfunction

    Get PDF
    AbstractObjectivesWe sought to examine the association between aortic valve sclerosis (AVS) and systemic endothelial manifestations of the atherosclerotic process.BackgroundClinical and experimental studies suggest that AVS is a manifestation of the atherosclerotic process. Systemic endothelial dysfunction is an early sign of the atherosclerotic process and can be assessed by ultrasonography of the brachial artery.MethodsA total of 102 in-hospital patients (76 men; mean age 63.5 ± 9.7 years) referred to the stress echocardiography laboratory underwent: 1) transthoracic echocardiography, with specific assessment of AVS (thickened valve leaflets with a transaortic flow velocity <2.5 m/s); 2) stress echocardiography; 3) coronary angiography, with evaluation of the Duke score (from 0 [normal] to 100 [most severe disease]); and 4) an endothelial function study, with assessment of endothelium-dependent, post-ischemic, flow-mediated dilation (FMD).ResultsAortic valve sclerosis was present in 35 patients (group I) and absent in 67 (group II). Groups I and II were similar in terms of the frequency of stress-induced wall motion abnormalities (35.3% vs. 19.4%, p = NS) and the angiographic Duke score (33.8 ± 28.6 vs. 35.2 ± 29.1, p = NS). Patients with AVS showed a markedly lower FMD than those without AVS (2.2 ± 3.5% vs. 5.3 ± 5.3%, p < 0.01). On multivariate analysis, only FMD was highly predictive of AVS, with an odds ratio of 1.18 for each percent decrease in FMD (95% confidence interval 1.05 to 1.32; p = 0.01).ConclusionsAortic valve stenosis is associated with systemic endothelial dysfunction. This observation may provide a mechanistic insight into the emerging association between AVS and cardiovascular events

    CMR predictors of secondary moderate to severe mitral regurgitation and its additive prognostic role in previous myocardial infarction

    No full text
    Background: We aimed to determine predictors and the additive prognostic role of moderate to severe (MS) ischemic mitral regurgitation (MR) in myocardial infarction (MI). Methods: Four hundred twenty-two patients with previous MI underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging for the assessment of left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF), end-diastolic (EDV) and end-systolic volume (ESV), sphericity index, wall motion score index (WMSI), and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). Echocardiography was performed to assess MR. Results: Thirty-eight had from moderate to severe MR (MS-MR group) and 384 did not (No MS-MR group). The S-MR group had higher LV volumes, sphericity index, WMSI, and LGE extent, and lower LVEF. At univariate logistic regression analysis, dilated volumes, SI \u3e0.43, dyskinesia of inferolateral wall, papillary muscle (PM)-LGE, and LGE extent \u3e16% were associated with MS-MR. At multivariate analysis, only SI (OR=5.7) and PM-LGE (OR=3) were independently associated with MS-MR. Considering only patients without LV dilatation, only dyskinesia in the inferolateral wall was a predictor of MS-MR (OR 34.8). Thirty cardiac events (cardiac death, appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator firing, and resuscitated cardiac arrest) occurred during a median follow-up of 1,276 days. After adjusting the prognostic variables at univariate analysis by age (\u3e65 years) and selecting those that were significant (EDV \u3e 95 ml/m2, ESV \u3e53 ml/m2, EF \u3c30%, WMSI \u3e1.65, LGE \u3e12%, S-MR), only WMSI \u3e1.65 and MS-MR remained an independent predictor of cardiac events. Conclusions: Increased WMSI and PM-LGE in the overall population and inferolateral dyskinesia in patients without ESV dilatation are predictors of MS-MR; MS-MR and elevated WMSI have independent negative prognostic value

    Left ventricular outflow tract velocity-time integral improves outcome prediction in patients with secondary mitral regurgitation.

    Full text link
    peer reviewedAIMS: Left ventricular outflow velocity-time integral (LVOT-VTI) has been shown to improve outcome prediction in different patients' subsets, with or without heart failure (HF). Nevertheless, the prognostic value of LVOT-VTI in patients with HF and secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) has never been investigated so far. Therefore, in the present study, we aimed to assess the prognostic value different metrics of LV forward output, including LVOT-VTI, in HF patients with secondary MR. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients with HF and moderate-to-severe/severe secondary MR and systolic dysfunction (i.e., left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] <50%) were retrospectively selected and followed-up for the primary endpoint of cardiac death. Out of the 287 patients analyzed (aged 74 ± 11 years, 70% men, 46% ischemic etiology, mean LVEF 30 ± 9%, mean LVOT-VTI 20 ± 5 cm), 71 met the primary endpoint over a 33-month median follow-up (16-47 months). Patients with an LVOT-VTI ≤17 cm (n = 96, 32%) showed the greatest risk of cardiac death (Log Rank 44.3, p < 0.001) and all-cause mortality (Log rank 8.6, p = 0.003). At multivariable regression analysis, all the measures of LV forward volume (namely LVOT-VTI, stroke volume index, cardiac output, and cardiac index) were predictors of poor outcomes. Among these, LVOT-VTI was the most accurate in risk prediction (univariable C-statistics 0.70 [95%CI 0.64-0.77]). CONCLUSION: Left ventricular forward output, noninvasively estimated through LVOT-VTI, improves outcome prediction in HF patients with low LVEF and secondary MR
    corecore