16 research outputs found
Variations in Earnings Growth: Evidence from Earnings Transitions in the NZ Linked Income Survey
A 2.3Mb deletion of 17q24.2-q24.3 associated with ‘Carney Complex plus’
We present a 12-year-old with a de novo interstitial deletion of approximately 2.3 Mb in chromosome band 17q24-2eq24.3, which was identified by array CGH. The most characteristic features in this case are posterior laryngeal cleft and the presence of numerous freckles and lentigines in childhood. Growth restriction, microcephaly and moderate mental retardation are also prominent features but are frequently
seen with other chromosomal anomalies. The microdeletion causes haploinsufficiency of PRKAR1A (protein kinase, cAMP-dependent, regulatory 1?), which is known to cause Carney Complex but this diagnosis alone does not account for all of her problems and she therefore has ‘Carney Complex plus’.
This report illustrates the practical benefits associated with a clear cytogenetic diagnosis, as regular endocrinological and cardiac screening is required
8p23.1 duplication syndrome differentiated from copy number variation of the defensin cluster at prenatal diagnosis in four new families
Background: the 8p23.1 duplication syndrome and copy number variation of the 8p23.1 defensin gene cluster are cytogenetically indistinguishable but distinct at the molecular level. To our knowledge, the 8p23.1 duplication syndrome has been described at prenatal diagnosis only once and we report our experience with four further apparent duplications ascertained at prenatal diagnosis.Methods: additional material at band 8p23.1 was detected using conventional G-banded cytogenetics in each case. Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) or Fluorescence In Situ Hybridisation (FISH) were used depending on whether only DNA (Cases 1 and 4) or cytogenetic preparations (Cases 2 and 3) were available from the laboratory of origin. The extent of the duplication in Case 1 was retrospectively determined using array Comparative Genomic Hybridisation (array CGH).Results: three cases of 8p23.1 duplication syndrome were found (Cases 1 to 3). Two were de novo and continued to term and the third, a paternally transmitted duplication, was terminated because of a previous child with psychomotor delay and 8p23.1 duplication syndrome. Case 1 was ascertained with a hypoplastic left heart but the ventricular septal and interventricular defects, in Cases 2 and 3 respectively, were found after ascertainment for advanced maternal age. By contrast, case 4 was a maternally transmitted copy number variation of the defensin cluster with normal outcome.Conclusions: our data underline the need to differentiate 8p23.1 duplications from copy number variation of the defensin cluster using FISH, MLPA or array CGH. Cardiac defects were ascertained by ultrasound in only one of the three duplication 8p23.1 pregnancies but were visible in two of the three at 21 to 22 weeks gestation. Our results provide further evidence that both deletion and duplication of the GATA4 transcription factor can give rise to a variety of conotruncal heart defects with variable penetrance and expressivit
Breakpoint mapping and haplotype analysis of three reciprocal translocations identify a novel recurrent translocation in two unrelated families: t(3;11) (p16.2;p15.4)
The majority of constitutional reciprocal translocations appear to be unique rearrangements arising from independent events. However, a small number of translocations are recurrent, most significantly the t(11;22)(q23;q11). Among large series of translocations there may be multiple independently ascertained cases with the same cytogenetic breakpoints. Some of these could represent additional recurrent rearrangements, alternatively they could be identical by descent (IBD) or have subtly different breakpoints when examined under higher resolution. We have used molecular breakpoint mapping and haplotyping to determine the origin of three pairs of reciprocal constitutional translocations, each with the same cytogenetic breakpoints. FISH mapping showed one pair to have different breakpoints and thus to be distinct rearrangements. Another pair of translocations were IBD with identical breakpoint intervals and highly conserved haplotypes on the derived chromosomes. The third pair, t(4;11)(p16.2;p15.4), had the same breakpoint intervals by aCGH and fosmid mapping but had very different haplotypes, therefore they represent a novel recurrent translocation. Unlike the t(11;22)(q23;q11), the formation of the t(4;11)(p16.2;p15.4) may have involved segmental duplications and sequence homology at the breakpoints. Additional examples of recurrent translocations could be identified if the resources were available to study more translocations using the approaches described here. However, like the t(4;11)(p16.2;p15.4), such translocations are likely to be rare with the t(11;22) remaining the only common recurrent constitutional reciprocal translocatio
Incomplete penetrance, variable expressivity or dosage insensitivity in four families with directly transmitted unbalanced chromosome abnormalities
The direct transmission of microscopically visible unbalanced chromosome abnormalities (UBCAs) is rare and usually has phenotypic consequences. Here we report four families in which a normal phenotype was initially found in one or more family members. Each UBCA was interpreted with regard to overlapping examples and factors previously associated with transmitted imbalances including incidental ascertainment, low gene density, benign copy number variation (CNV) content and gene relatedness. A 4.56 Mb deletion of 8p23.1-p23.2 was thought to be causal in the affected proband but showed incomplete penetrance in her mother and sibling (Family 1). Incomplete penetrance was also associated with a 10.88 Mb duplication of 13q21.31-q22.1 (Family 3) and dosage insensitivity with a 17.6 Mb deletion of 22pter-q11.21 (Family 4) that were both ascertained at prenatal diagnosis and each found in 4 unaffected family members. The 22pter-q11.21 deletion is part of a region with high benign CNV content and supports the mapping of cat eye syndrome to a 600 kb interval of 22q11.1-q11.21. Low gene densities of less than 2.0 genes/Mb were found in each of these three families but only after segmentally duplicated genes were excluded from the deletions of 8p and 22q. In contrast, gene density was average and variable expressivity associated with a 3.59 Mb duplication of 8p23.1 incidentally ascertained for paternal infertility (Family 2). Our results indicate that a greater degree of direct parental transmission, incomplete penetrance and variable expression are features of both sub-microscopic CNVs and UBCAs with relatively low gene and high benign CNV content
8p23.1 duplication syndrome; a novel genomic condition with unexpected complexity revealed by array CGH
The 8p23.1 deletion syndrome is established but not an equivalent duplication syndrome. Here, we report five patients; a de novo prenatal case and two families in which 8p23.1 duplications have been directly transmitted from mothers to children. Dual-colour fluorescent in situ hybridisation, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification analysis and customised oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridisation (oaCGH) indicated an approximately 3.75 Mb duplication of most of band 8p23.1 between the olfactory receptor/defensin repeats (ORDRs) in all cases. However, oaCGH revealed an additional duplication of 500 kb adjacent to the proximal ORDR in Family 1 and an additional deletion of 3.14 Mb within the Nablus Mask-Like Facial Syndrome region of 8q22.1 in Family 2. Copy number variation at introns 4-5 of the GATA4 gene was also identified. This 8p23.1 duplication syndrome is associated with a characteristic facial phenotype including a prominent forehead and arched eyebrows. Adrenal insufficiency, Tetralogy of Fallot, partial 2/3 syndactyly of the toes and cleft palate in some individuals may be explained by ascertainment bias, incomplete penetrance and/or the presence of the microdeletion in Family 2. The duplication is compatible with normal early childhood development but, although our adult cases live independent lives with varying degrees of support, learning difficulties have been experienced by some family members. We conclude that the 8p23.1 duplication syndrome is a genomic condition with an emerging but variable phenotype that may be under-diagnosed. Our results demonstrate that direct transmission does not distinguish genuine duplications from euchromatic variants and illustrate the power of array CGH to reveal unexpected additional imbalances in affected patients
Deletions of 2q14 that include the homeobox engrailed 1 (EN1) transcription factor are compatible with a normal phenotype
A novel transmitted 2-3 Mb deletion of 2q14.1-q14.2 was found in an affected boy from a consanguineous family with a possible diagnosis of PEHO syndrome (OMIM 260565). BAC FISH showed that the deletion included a minimum of 20 genes including the homeobox engrailed 1 gene (EN1). However, the same deletion was also found in his phenotypically normal father and brother (family 1). The phenotype of the proband may, therefore, have been coincidental to the deletion, a result of a recessive condition within or outside the deleted segment or possibly due to variable dosage compensation of EN1 by the paralogous EN2 gene at 7q36. BAC FISH also showed that this deletion overlapped with a previously reported transmitted deletion of 2q13-q14.1 that had no phenotypic consequences (family 2). The deleted regions contained a total of 32 genes and comprise the final 5.25 Mb of the ancestral chromosome 2B from which chromosome 2 was formed in man. These families provide further evidence that heterozygous deletions of regions of low gene density are compatible with a normal phenotype
Kabuki syndrome: new ocular findings but no evidence of 8p22-p23.1 duplications in a clinically defined cohort
The underlying cause of the multiple congenital anomalies/mental retardation syndrome Kabuki syndrome (KS, OMIM 147920) has not yet been established. We identified seven patients who fulfilled the classical clinical criteria for this syndrome and undertook a detailed clinical, ophthalomological and molecular cytogenetic review. Three of the seven patients had previously undetected ocular anomalies including myopia, ptosis, strabismus and tilted discs. The identification of preventable causes of loss of vision underlines the value of detailed ophthalmologic examination of KS patients. Using BAC fluorescence in situ hybridisation, there was no evidence of the duplication of 8p recently reported by Milunsky and Huang. We conclude that the cause of KS has yet to be established