DTaP combination vaccine use and adherence: A retrospective cohort study

Despite universal recommendation of the 4-dose diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis (DTaP) vaccine series, coverage and timeliness in the US remain suboptimal. DTaP-containing combination vaccines (i.e. quadrivalent and pentavalent) are presumed to improve vaccine coverage rates and timeliness, but research supporting this claim is limited. We sought to investigate the associations between DTaP-containing vaccine use and adherence to the recommended DTaP immunization schedule among children in the US. Using a large claims database, we identified privately insured children born between 2009 and 2016 that received >= 1 DTaP-containing vaccine and had >= 24 months of enrollment from birth, excluding those with DTaP vaccinations not aligned with approved dose indications. Children were classified by DTaP-containing vaccine receipt: combination vaccines only, stand-alone vaccines only, or a mixture of both. Outcome measures included: 1) completion of the 4-dose series and 2) timely receipt of doses. Outcomes were adjusted for gender, birth year, race, and socioeconomic status. The study cohort contained 412,441 children. Of these, 40.5% (167,084) received combination vaccines only, 14.9% (61,342) received stand-alone vaccines only, and 44.6% (184,015) received a mixture of both. Combination vaccine recipients were nearly 3 times as likely to complete the 4-dose series (OR 2.93 (95% CI: 2.88, 2.99)) and for all doses received, more than 4 times as likely to receive doses on time (OR 4.12 (4.04, 4.21), relative to stand-alone vaccine recipients. Significance disparities in adherence were also observed, where minorities were up to 30% less likely (OR 0.70 (0.68, 0.71)) to complete the 4-dose series and up to 27% less likely (OR 0.73 (0.72, 0.75)) to receive doses on time, relative to white children. Our findings demonstrated that adherence to the recommended DTaP immunization schedule was significantly greater among combination vaccine recipients, relative to stand-alone recipients. Further research is needed to investigate underlying causes of disparities in adherence. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd

Safety and use of tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis-5 (Tdap5) vaccine during pregnancy: findings from 11 years of reporting to a pregnancy registry

The “Adacel (Tdap5) Pregnancy Registry” was used to identify 1182 women who received the tetanus, diphtheria, acellular pertussis [5 components] (Tdap5) vaccine during pregnancy from 2005 to 2016. To evaluate the safety and use of prenatal Tdap5, we calculated the rate of maternal, obstetrical, pregnancy and neonatal outcomes following Tdap5 pregnancy exposure and assessed vaccine uptake by year and trimester of exposure. The most commonly reported maternal adverse events included injection site reactions (2.6%; 95% Confidence Interval 1.8%, 3.7%), nervous system events (1.3%; 0.8%, 2.1%) and musculoskeletal events (1.1%; 0.6%, 1.9%). The most commonly reported complications of pregnancy were hypertension/preeclampsia (5.5%; 3.3%, 8.9%) and gestational diabetes (2.5%; 1.1%, 5.3%), while those for labor and delivery were premature labor (2.9%; 1.4%, 5.7%) and premature membrane rupture (1.5%; 0.4%, 3.8%). These rates were similar to, or lower than those reported for the general population of pregnant women. Among pregnancies with known birth outcomes (N = 275), 90.4% (86.2%, 93.4%) resulted in a live birth, 5.9% (3.6%, 9.5%) in spontaneous abortion, 3.0% (1.4%, 5.8%) in stillbirth, and 0.7% (0.0%, 2.8%) in ectopic pregnancies. Most newborns had normal APGAR scores and birth weights (98.1% and 93.0%, respectively), and only two reported a congenital anomaly (0.7%; 0.0%, 2.8%). An influx of reports in 2012 with third trimester Tdap5 exposure coincided with the 2012 updated Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommendations. This analysis did not identify any safety concerns across the continuum of maternal, obstetrical, pregnancy, and neonatal outcomes in women who received Tdap5 vaccination during pregnancy

Safety and Immunogenicity of Tetanus-Diphtheria-Acellular Pertussis Vaccine Administered to Children 10 or 11 Years of Age

Overall left side view; Constructed around a sinuous line, her contrapposto incomplete, Meditation originated in a figure on the tympanum of The Gates of Hell, inspired by Michelangelo. She was then reworked into the Monument to Victor Hugo (ca. 1896), before being enlarged under the name The Inner Voice. She represented one of the muses who inspired the poet. In order to include her in the monument, Rodin had to remove her arms and amputate part of her legs. This bronze is a further reworking and enlargment, adding the arms. The cast was done after 1900 and stands in the museum gardens. Source: Musée Rodin [website]; http://www.musee-rodin.fr/en/ (accessed 6/18/2015

Anaphylaxis: case definition and guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation of immunization safety data

Jens U. Rüggeberg, Michael S. Gold, José-Maria Bayas, Michael D. Blum, Jan Bonhoeffer, Sheila Friedlander, Glacus de Souza Brito, Ulrich Heininger, Babatunde Imoukhuede, Ali Khamesipour, Michel Erlewyn-Lajeunesse, Susana Martin, Mika Mäkelä, Patricia Nell, Vitali Pool, Nick Simpson and The Brighton Collaboration Anaphylaxis Working Grouphttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30521/description#descriptio

Small for gestational age: Case definition & guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation of maternal immunisation safety data

Need for developing case definitions and guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation for small for gestational age (SGA) as an adverse event following maternal immunisation Small for gestational age (SGA) fetuses or newborns are those smaller in size than normal for their gestational age, most commonly defined as a weight below the 10th percentile for the gestational age. This classification was originally developed by a 1995 World Health Organization (WHO) expert committee, and the definition is based on a birthweight-for-gestational-age measure compared to a gender-specific reference population [1,2]