Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy: reproductive counseling, pregnancy, and delivery in a complex multigenetic disease

Reproductive counseling in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) can be challenging due to the complexity of its underlying genetic mechanisms and due to incomplete penetrance of the disease. Full understanding of the genetic causes and potential inheritance patterns of both distinct FSHD types is essential: FSHD1 is an autosomal dominantly inherited repeat disorder, whereas FSHD2 is a digenic disorder. This has become even more relevant now that prenatal diagnosis and preimplantation genetic diagnosis options are available for FSHD1. Pregnancy and delivery outcomes in FSHD are usually favorable, but clinicians should be aware of the risks. We aim to provide clinicians with case-based strategies for reproductive counseling in FSHD, as well as recommendations for pregnancy and delivery.Genetics of disease, diagnosis and treatmen

Quantitative muscle MRI and ultrasound for facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy: complementary imaging biomarkers

Contains fulltext : 197402.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access

Characterizing the face in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy

Contains fulltext : 232742.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)OBJECTIVE: To evaluate facial weakness in patients with FSHD to better define clinical signs, and pilot a facial weakness severity score. METHODS: 87 FSHD patients and 55 controls were video recorded while performing seven facial tasks. The videos were assessed by three independent examiners to compile an overview of signs of facial weakness. Next, videos were semi-quantitatively assessed using a newly developed 4-point facial weakness score (FWS). This score was evaluated and correlated to other FSHD disease characteristics. RESULTS: Patients had lower scores on the total FWS than controls (mean score 43 ± 28, range 4-118, vs 14 ± 9, range 0-35, p < 0.001) and on all seven individual facial tasks (all p < 0.001). 54% of patients had FWS scores outside the range of controls. Patients had more asymmetry between the left and right side of the face than controls. About 10% of the patients had very mild facial weakness. These were mostly males (89%) with longer D4Z4 repeat sizes of 7-9 units. More severe facial weakness correlated to more severe overall disease severity and shorter D4Z4 repeat size, but not to disease duration. Interobserver agreement for the FWS between three raters was low with a Fleiss Kappa of 0.437. CONCLUSION: This study provides an overview of the clinical spectrum of facial weakness and its relation to other disease characteristics. The 4-point scale we introduced to grade the severity of facial weakness enables correlation of facial weakness to disease characteristics, but is not suited as clinical outcome measure for longitudinal studies

Development and validation of the patient-reported "Facial Function Scale" for facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy.

PURPOSE: Facial weakness and its functional consequences are an often underappreciated clinical feature of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) by healthcare professionals and researchers. This is at least in part due to the fact that there are few adequate clinical outcome measures available. METHODS: We developed the Facial Function Scale, a Rasch-built questionnaire on the functional disabilities relating to facial weakness in FSHD. A preliminary 33-item questionnaire was created based on semi-structured interviews with 16 FSHD patients and completed by 119 patients. For reliability studies, 73 patients completed it again after a two-week interval. Data were subjected to semi-automated Rasch analysis to select the most appropriate item set to fit model expectations. RESULTS: This resulted in a 25-item unidimensional, linear-weighted questionnaire with high internal consistency (person separation index = 0.92) and test-retest reliability (patients' locations ICC = 0.98 and items' locations ICC = 0.99). Good external construct validity scores were obtained through correlation with the Communicative Participation Item Bank questionnaire, examiner-reported Facial Weakness Score and facial weakness subscale of the FSHD evaluation score (respectively r = 0.733, r = -0.566, and r = 0.441, all p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a linear-weighted, clinimetrically sound, patient-reported outcome measure on the functional disabilities relating to facial weakness in FSHD, to enable further research on this relevant topic.Implications for rehabilitationFacial weakness and its functional consequences are an often underappreciated clinical feature of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD), both in symptomatic treatment and in research.To enable the development and testing of therapeutic symptomatic interventions for facial weakness, clinical outcome measures are required.This study provides a linear-weighted, clinimetrically sound, patient-reported outcome measure on the functional disabilities relating to facial weakness in FSHD patients

Adding quantitative muscle MRI to the FSHD clinical trial toolbox

Functional Genomics of Muscle, Nerve and Brain Disorder