Über die Anwendung des Furfurols als Reagens zur Erkennung des Sesamöls in Ölmischungen

n/

Whither the PET Scan? The Role of PET Imaging in the Staging and Treatment of Breast Cancer

Metabolic imaging may contribute to a better knowledge of the biology of breast cancer and to new drugs development. Positron emission tomography (PET) with the radiolabeled glucose analogue 2- [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) allows quantitative assessment of glucose utilization in tumor tissue. This technique utilizes a class of radioisotopes that decay by emitting a positron. The positron travels a short distance (1 mm) before interacting with an electron in what is called an annihilation reaction. This results in the creation of two high-energy photons that are emitted in opposite directions. The PET scanner detects such annihilation radiations and produces a three-dimensional picture of the distribution of the radiolabeled tracer. 18F-FDG PET has currently a limited role in breast cancer, due to its low sensitivity that makes it not recommended in most of the cases, especially in early disease. Potentially, the most useful application of PET/CT is monitoring the changes in 18F-FDG uptake during chemotherapy in order to detect an early response to treatment. In fact, while morphological changes due to effective chemotherapy are not detectable until late in the course of treatment, metabolic changes generally occur earlier. In this paper, we summarize the current and future applications of PET in the management of breast cancer

18F-DOPA PET/CT in neuroblastoma: comparison of conventional imaging with CT/MR.

AIM: Role of 18F-DOPA PET/CT in neuroblastoma (NB) compared with CT/MR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In all, 21 patients (M:F = 14:7; mean age, 7.4 years) affected by advanced stage NB (III-IV) were prospectively enrolled. Overall, 37 paired 18F-DOPA PET and CT/MR scans were performed, and for each, we identified site and number of lesions. Standard of reference was based on a multidisciplinary assessment, including 123I-MIBG, selective biopsy, and clinical-instrumental monitoring. Both scan-based and a lesion-based analysis was performed, and for each modality, we calculated sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and accuracy. RESULTS: On the scan-based analysis, 18F-DOPA PET and CT/MR showed the following rates: sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV, and accuracy were 100%, 92.3%, 100%, 96%, and 97.3% versus 91.7%, 61.5%, 80%, 81.5%, and 81.1%, respectively (P = 0.014). Overall 179 findings were reported at imaging, of which 139 (77.7%) resulted true sites of disease at final outcome. On the lesion-based analysis, the 2 imaging modalities showed the following sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV, and accuracy rates: 90.6%, 90%, 73.5%, 96.9%, and 90.5% versus 47.5%, 27.5%, 13.1%, 69.5%, and 43% (P < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, 18F-DOPA PET/CT results more accurate than CT/MR in advanced stage NB therefore should be taken into consideration for the diagnostic workup of these patients