Optimization of atmospheric plasma treatment of LDPE films: Influence on adhesive properties and ageing behavior

One of the major disadvantages of low density polyethylene (LDPE) films is their poor adhesive properties. Therefore, LDPE films have been treated with atmospheric pressure air plasma in order to improve their surface properties. So as to simulate the possible conditions in an industrial process, the samples have been treated with two different sample distances (6 and 10 mm), and treatment rates between 100 and 1000 mm s-1. The different sample distances are the distance of the sample from the plasma source. The variation of the surface properties and adhesion characteristics of the films were investigated for different aging times after plasma exposure (up to 21 days) using contact angle measurement, atomic force microscopy, weight loss measurements and shear test. Results show that the treatment increases the polar component () and these changes improve adhesive properties of the material. After the twenty-first day, the ageing process causes a decrease of wettability and adhesive properties of the LDPE films (up to 60%).Fombuena Borrás, V.; García Sanoguera, D.; Sánchez Nacher, L.; Balart Gimeno, RA.; Boronat Vitoria, T. (2014). Optimization of atmospheric plasma treatment of LDPE films: Influence on adhesive properties and ageing behavior. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology. 28(1):97-113. doi:10.1080/01694243.2013.847045S97113281Achilias, D. S., Roupakias, C., Megalokonomos, P., Lappas, A. A., & Antonakou, Ε. V. (2007). Chemical recycling of plastic wastes made from polyethylene (LDPE and HDPE) and polypropylene (PP). Journal of Hazardous Materials, 149(3), 536-542. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.06.076Friedman, M., & Walsh, G. (2002). High performance films: Review of new materials and trends. Polymer Engineering & Science, 42(8), 1756-1788. doi:10.1002/pen.11069Wiles, D. M., & Scott, G. (2006). Polyolefins with controlled environmental degradability. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 91(7), 1581-1592. doi:10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.09.010Gao, J., Lei, J., Li, Q., & Ye, S. (2004). Functionalized low-density polyethylene via a novel photografting method and its adhesion properties. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 18(2), 195-203. doi:10.1163/156856104772759403Shenton, M. J., Lovell-Hoare, M. C., & Stevens, G. C. (2001). Adhesion enhancement of polymer surfaces by atmospheric plasma treatment. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 34(18), 2754-2760. doi:10.1088/0022-3727/34/18/307Belgacem, M. N., Salon-Brochier, M. C., Krouit, M., & Bras, J. (2011). Recent Advances in Surface Chemical Modification of Cellulose Fibres. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 25(6-7), 661-684. doi:10.1163/016942410x525867Friedrich, J., Unger, W., & Lippitz, A. (1995). Plasma modification of polymer surfaces. Macromolecular Symposia, 100(1), 111-115. doi:10.1002/masy.19951000118Ladizesky, N. H., & Ward, I. M. (1989). The adhesion behaviour of high modulus polyethylene fibres following plasma and chemical treatment. Journal of Materials Science, 24(10), 3763-3773. doi:10.1007/bf02385768Nardin, M., & Ward, I. M. (1987). Influence of surface treatment on adhesion of polyethylene fibres. Materials Science and Technology, 3(10), 814-826. doi:10.1179/mst.1987.3.10.814Villagra Di Carlo, B., Gottifredi, J. C., & Habert, A. C. (2010). Synthesis and characterization of composite membrane by deposition of acrylic acid plasma polymer onto pre-treated polyethersulfone support. Journal of Materials Science, 46(6), 1850-1856. doi:10.1007/s10853-010-5012-4Matsunaga, M., & Whitney, P. J. (2000). Surface changes brought about by corona discharge treatment of polyethylene film and the effect on subsequent microbial colonisation. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 70(3), 325-332. doi:10.1016/s0141-3910(00)00105-1Novák, I., Pollák, V., & Chodák, I. (2006). Study of Surface Properties of Polyolefins Modified by Corona Discharge Plasma. Plasma Processes and Polymers, 3(4-5), 355-364. doi:10.1002/ppap.200500163Arpagaus, C., Rossi, A., & Rudolf von Rohr, P. (2005). Short-time plasma surface modification of HDPE powder in a Plasma Downer Reactor – process, wettability improvement and ageing effects. Applied Surface Science, 252(5), 1581-1595. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2005.02.099Morra, M., Occhiello, E., Marola, R., Garbassi, F., Humphrey, P., & Johnson, D. (1990). On the aging of oxygen plasma-treated polydimethylsiloxane surfaces. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 137(1), 11-24. doi:10.1016/0021-9797(90)90038-pKim, K. S., Ryu, C. M., Park, C. S., Sur, G. S., & Park, C. E. (2003). Investigation of crystallinity effects on the surface of oxygen plasma treated low density polyethylene using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Polymer, 44(20), 6287-6295. doi:10.1016/s0032-3861(03)00674-8Kim, S. H., Ha, H. J., Ko, Y. K., Yoon, S. J., Rhee, J. M., Kim, M. S., … Khang, G. (2007). Correlation of proliferation, morphology and biological responses of fibroblasts on LDPE with different surface wettability. Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition, 18(5), 609-622. doi:10.1163/156856207780852514Borcia, G., Anderson, C. A., & Brown, N. M. D. (2004). The surface oxidation of selected polymers using an atmospheric pressure air dielectric barrier discharge. Part I. Applied Surface Science, 221(1-4), 203-214. doi:10.1016/s0169-4332(03)00879-1Pascual, M., Calvo, O., Sanchez-Nácher, L., Bonet, M. A., Garcia-Sanoguera, D., & Balart, R. (2009). Optimization of adhesive joints of low density polyethylene (LDPE) composite laminates with polyolefin foam using corona discharge plasma. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 114(5), 2971-2977. doi:10.1002/app.30906Encinas, N., Díaz-Benito, B., Abenojar, J., & Martínez, M. A. (2010). Extreme durability of wettability changes on polyolefin surfaces by atmospheric pressure plasma torch. Surface and Coatings Technology, 205(2), 396-402. doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.06.069Takke, V., Behary, N., Perwuelz, A., & Campagne, C. (2009). Studies on the atmospheric air-plasma treatment of PET (polyethylene terephtalate) woven fabrics: Effect of process parameters and of aging. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 114(1), 348-357. doi:10.1002/app.30618Awaja, F., Gilbert, M., Kelly, G., Fox, B., & Pigram, P. J. (2009). Adhesion of polymers. Progress in Polymer Science, 34(9), 948-968. doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.04.007Garcia, D., Sanchez, L., Fenollar, O., Lopez, R., & Balart, R. (2008). Modification of polypropylene surface by CH4–O2 low-pressure plasma to improve wettability. Journal of Materials Science, 43(10), 3466-3473. doi:10.1007/s10853-007-2322-2Guimond, S., & Wertheimer, M. R. (2004). Surface degradation and hydrophobic recovery of polyolefins treated by air corona and nitrogen atmospheric pressure glow discharge. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 94(3), 1291-1303. doi:10.1002/app.21134Pascual, M., Balart, R., Sánchez, L., Fenollar, O., & Calvo, O. (2008). Study of the aging process of corona discharge plasma effects on low density polyethylene film surface. Journal of Materials Science, 43(14), 4901-4909. doi:10.1007/s10853-008-2712-0Sanchis, R., Fenollar, O., García, D., Sánchez, L., & Balart, R. (2008). Improved adhesion of LDPE films to polyolefin foams for automotive industry using low-pressure plasma. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 28(8), 445-451. doi:10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.04.002Fresnais, J., Chapel, J. P., Benyahia, L., & Poncin-Epaillard, F. (2009). Plasma-Treated Superhydrophobic Polyethylene Surfaces: Fabrication, Wetting and Dewetting Properties. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 23(3), 447-467. doi:10.1163/156856108x370127Abenojar, J., Colera, I., Martínez, M. A., & Velasco, F. (2010). Study by XPS of an Atmospheric Plasma-Torch Treated Glass: Influence on Adhesion. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 24(11-12), 1841-1854. doi:10.1163/016942410x507614Lommatzsch, U., Pasedag, D., Baalmann, A., Ellinghorst, G., & Wagner, H.-E. (2007). Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Jet Treatment of Polyethylene Surfaces for Adhesion Improvement. Plasma Processes and Polymers, 4(S1), S1041-S1045. doi:10.1002/ppap.200732402Balu, B., Berry, A. D., Patel, K. T., Breedveld, V., & Hess, D. W. (2011). Directional Mobility and Adhesion of Water Drops on Patterned Superhydrophobic Surfaces. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 25(6-7), 627-642. doi:10.1163/016942410x525849Bhattacharya, S., Singh, R. K., Mandal, S., Ghosh, A., Bok, S., Korampally, V., … Gangopadhyay, S. (2010). Plasma Modification of Polymer Surfaces and Their Utility in Building Biomedical Microdevices. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 24(15-16), 2707-2739. doi:10.1163/016942410x511105Das, S., Neogi, S., Chainy, G. B. N., & Guha, S. K. (2011). A Novel Two-Step Procedure for Plasma Surface Modification of Low-Density Polyethylene for Improved Drug Adhesion in Intra Uterine Devices (IUDs). Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 25(1-3), 151-167. doi:10.1163/016942410x503285Schulz, U., Munzert, P., & Kaiser, N. (2010). Plasma Surface Modification of PMMA for Optical Applications. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 24(7), 1283-1289. doi:10.1163/016942409x12561252292026Silverstein, M. S., Breuer, O., & Dodiuk, H. (1994). Surface modification of UHMWPE fibers. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 52(12), 1785-1795. doi:10.1002/app.1994.070521213Inagaki, N., Narushim, K., Tuchida, N., & Miyazaki, K. (2004). Surface characterization of plasma-modified poly(ethylene terephthalate) film surfaces. Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics, 42(20), 3727-3740. doi:10.1002/polb.20234Nakamatsu, J., Delgado-Aparicio, L. F., Da Silva, R., & Soberon, F. (1999). Ageing of plasma-treated poly(tetrafluoroethylene) surfaces. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 13(7), 753-761. doi:10.1163/156856199x00983Yun, Y. I., Kim, K. S., Uhm, S.-J., Khatua, B. B., Cho, K., Kim, J. K., & Park, C. E. (2004). Aging behavior of oxygen plasma-treated polypropylene with different crystallinities. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 18(11), 1279-1291. doi:10.1163/1568561041588200Morent, R., De Geyter, N., Leys, C., Gengembre, L., & Payen, E. (2007). Study of the ageing behaviour of polymer films treated with a dielectric barrier discharge in air, helium and argon at medium pressure. Surface and Coatings Technology, 201(18), 7847-7854. doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.03.018Zhao, B., & Kwon, H. J. (2011). Adhesion of Polymers in Paper Products from the Macroscopic to Molecular Level — An Overview. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 25(6-7), 557-579. doi:10.1163/016942410x52582

Weaning from mechanical ventilation in intensive care units across 50 countries (WEAN SAFE): a multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study

International audienceBackground: Current management practices and outcomes in weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation are poorly understood. We aimed to describe the epidemiology, management, timings, risk for failure, and outcomes of weaning in patients requiring at least 2 days of invasive mechanical ventilation. Methods: WEAN SAFE was an international, multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study done in 481 intensive care units in 50 countries. Eligible participants were older than 16 years, admitted to a participating intensive care unit, and receiving mechanical ventilation for 2 calendar days or longer. We defined weaning initiation as the first attempt to separate a patient from the ventilator, successful weaning as no reintubation or death within 7 days of extubation, and weaning eligibility criteria based on positive end-expiratory pressure, fractional concentration of oxygen in inspired air, and vasopressors. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients successfully weaned at 90 days. Key secondary outcomes included weaning duration, timing of weaning events, factors associated with weaning delay and weaning failure, and hospital outcomes. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03255109. Findings: Between Oct 4, 2017, and June 25, 2018, 10 232 patients were screened for eligibility, of whom 5869 were enrolled. 4523 (77·1%) patients underwent at least one separation attempt and 3817 (65·0%) patients were successfully weaned from ventilation at day 90. 237 (4·0%) patients were transferred before any separation attempt, 153 (2·6%) were transferred after at least one separation attempt and not successfully weaned, and 1662 (28·3%) died while invasively ventilated. The median time from fulfilling weaning eligibility criteria to first separation attempt was 1 day (IQR 0–4), and 1013 (22·4%) patients had a delay in initiating first separation of 5 or more days. Of the 4523 (77·1%) patients with separation attempts, 2927 (64·7%) had a short wean (≤1 day), 457 (10·1%) had intermediate weaning (2–6 days), 433 (9·6%) required prolonged weaning (≥7 days), and 706 (15·6%) had weaning failure. Higher sedation scores were independently associated with delayed initiation of weaning. Delayed initiation of weaning and higher sedation scores were independently associated with weaning failure. 1742 (31·8%) of 5479 patients died in the intensive care unit and 2095 (38·3%) of 5465 patients died in hospital. Interpretation: In critically ill patients receiving at least 2 days of invasive mechanical ventilation, only 65% were weaned at 90 days. A better understanding of factors that delay the weaning process, such as delays in weaning initiation or excessive sedation levels, might improve weaning success rates. Funding: European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, European Respiratory Society