Etnografia e manejo de recursos naturais pelos índios Deni, Amazonas, Brasil Ethnography and natural resources management by the Deni Indians, Amazonas, Brazil

São raros os estudos envolvendo o uso múltiplo de recursos naturais por populações amazônicas. Este trabalho apresenta um panorama de como os índios Deni, habitantes da região de interflúvio entre dois dos maiores afluentes de água branca da bacia amazônica, os rios Juruá e Purus, utilizam dos recursos disponíveis em seu território. Os Deni são, atualmente, índios que vivem da exploração de recursos da terra firme e de regiões alagadas. São um misto de horticultores e caçadores/coletores, que utilizam toda a sua área para a obtenção de recursos para subsistência. Como regra, deslocam periodicamente seus assentamentos, evitando o esgotamento local de recursos, e provocando a modificação local do ambiente. Esta alteração aumenta temporariamente a disponibilidade de alimento. Áreas com aldeias, pomares e roçados abandonados, por sua vez, tornam-se locais onde se concentram inúmeros recursos da flora e da fauna, posteriormente explorados. O impacto provocado por este sistema é aparentemente mínimo. Os Deni estão contextualizados na periferia de um sistema capitalista, onde a única fonte de renda para adquirir bens que são hoje considerados pelos índios como indispensáveis para sua sobrevivência são os recursos naturais. Estes são e continuarão sendo explorados de maneira a produzir um excedente a ser comercializado para a obtenção de uma série de produtos industrializados, independentemente das opiniões externas. É sobre este patamar que devemos avaliar a sustentabilidade do atual manejo da área.<br>Studies concerning the use of multiple natural resources by Amazonian indians are scarce. This work presents a portrait of how the Deni Indians, inhabitants of an area between two of the most important white-water rivers of the Amazon basin (Juruá and Purus Rivers), exploit natural resources in their territory. The Deni exploit both the upland and floodplain forests. They are a mix of horticulturalists and hunter-gatherers, using their whole territory to obtain what they need to live. As a rule, they move their settlements periodically, avoiding local resource depletion. The Deni modify the landscape at a local level, causing an increase in resource availability. Abandoned villages, fruit orchards and crops are places where floristic and faunistic resources concentrate and are systematically exploited. The impacts of such management are apparently minimal. For the Deni society natural resources are the only way to get goods for survival, but it is inserted in the periphery of a capitalist system which exploits and will continue to exploit natural resources in order to produce a surplus for the acquisition of industrialized products, independently of external judgements. This should be the starting point to evaluate sustainability in this local management system

Decline of Some West-Central Florida Anuran Populations in Response to Habitat Degradation

Recent reports have suggested that a global decline in amphibian populations has taken place during the past few decades. Urban development is thought to affect the richness and abundances of species and, therefore, could be an important cause of decline. We estimated the richness and abundances of anurans in wetlands at a residential development and in similar wetlands at a nearby undeveloped park. The residential development originally was pine flatwoods habitat, as is the undeveloped park curiently. We also compared the anuran species\u27 composition of the park in 1992 with the composition in 1974. Both richness and abundances of anurans in the residential development were different than those in the undeveloped park. Employing the same amount of sampling effort at both sites, we trapped or observed 11 species at the developement and 15 species at the park, and trapped 569 individuals at the development and 1224 individuals at the park. The anuran species richness at the undeveloped park in 1992 was nearly the same as in 1974; a single rare species apparently was not present in 1992. Of the 15 species present in both surveys, 14 showed higher abundances in 1992 than in 1974. We suggest that the current differences between the residential development and the park have resulted from degradation of both the uplands used by many species during the dry season and the temporary wetlands used by many species for reproduction. Four species especially sensitive to such degradation, Bufo quercicus, Scaphiopus h. holbrookii, Hyla femoralis, and H. gratiosa, were the species missing from the residential development. Not all species of anurans typical of pine flatwoods appeared to be affected adversely by development. Three species of ranids, Rana utricularia, R. grylio, and R. catesbeiana, were found in higher abundances at the residential development than at the park. These ranid species breed in a wide variety of aquatic systems, including the permanent bodies of water that are now abundant in the development, and probably use the uplands less than other anurans. If amphibian decline is international in scope, then the decline could be attributable either to global changes caused by humans, or to local, but widespread, environmental degradation, or to a combination of factors. While much recent popular focus has been on potential global causes of decline, we believe that this emphasis may have caused attention to be taken away from local causes that, as our study demonstrated, may be at least as important. We suggest that in many places, local environmental degradation is insidiously chipping away at amphibian diversity, and that more emphasis should be placed on these local causes than is now the case