Intra-uterine insemination for unexplained subfertility

BACKGROUND: Intra-uterine insemination (IUI) is a widely-used fertility treatment for couples with unexplained subfertility. Although IUI is less invasive and less expensive than in vitro fertilisation (IVF), the safety of IUI in combination with ovarian hyperstimulation (OH) is debated. The main concern about IUI treatment with OH is the increase in multiple pregnancy rates. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether, for couples with unexplained subfertility, the live birth rate is improved following IUI treatment with or without OH compared to timed intercourse (TI) or expectant management with or without OH, or following IUI treatment with OH compared to IUI in a natural cycle. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility (CGF) Group trials register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and two trials registers up to 17 October 2019, together with reference checking and contact with study authors for missing or unpublished data. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing IUI with TI or expectant management, both in stimulated or natural cycles, or IUI in stimulated cycles with IUI in natural cycles in couples with unexplained subfertility. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently performed study selection, quality assessment and data extraction. Primary review outcomes were live birth rate and multiple pregnancy rate. MAIN RESULTS: We include 15 trials with 2068 women. The evidence was of very low to moderate quality. The main limitation was very serious imprecision. IUI in a natural cycle versus timed intercourse or expectant management in a natural cycle It is uncertain whether treatment with IUI in a natural cycle improves live birth rate compared to treatment with expectant management in a natural cycle (odds ratio (OR) 1.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.92 to 2.78; 1 RCT, 334 women; low-quality evidence). If we assume the chance of a live birth with expectant management in a natural cycle to be 16%, that of IUI in a natural cycle would be between 15% and 34%. It is uncertain whether treatment with IUI in a natural cycle reduces multiple pregnancy rates compared to control (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.04 to 5.53; 1 RCT, 334 women; low-quality evidence). IUI in a stimulated cycle versus timed intercourse or expectant management in a stimulated cycle It is uncertain whether treatment with IUI in a stimulated cycle improves live birth rates compared to treatment with TI in a stimulated cycle (OR 1.59, 95% CI 0.88 to 2.88; 2 RCTs, 208 women; I2 = 72%; low-quality evidence). If we assume the chance of achieving a live birth with TI in a stimulated cycle was 26%, the chance with IUI in a stimulated cycle would be between 23% and 50%. It is uncertain whether treatment with IUI in a stimulated cycle reduces multiple pregnancy rates compared to control (OR 1.46, 95% CI 0.55 to 3.87; 4 RCTs, 316 women; I2 = 0%; low-quality evidence). IUI in a stimulated cycle versus timed intercourse or expectant management in a natural cycle In couples with a low prediction score of natural conception, treatment with IUI combined with clomiphene citrate or letrozole probably results in a higher live birth rate compared to treatment with expectant management in a natural cycle (OR 4.48, 95% CI 2.00 to 10.01; 1 RCT; 201 women; moderate-quality evidence). If we assume the chance of a live birth with expectant management in a natural cycle was 9%, the chance of a live birth with IUI in a stimulated cycle would be between 17% and 50%. It is uncertain whether treatment with IUI in a stimulated cycle results in a lower multiple pregnancy rate compared to control (OR 3.01, 95% CI 0.47 to 19.28; 2 RCTs, 454 women; I2 = 0%; low-quality evidence). IUI in a natural cycle versus timed intercourse or expectant management in a stimulated cycle Treatment with IUI in a natural cycle probably results in a higher cumulative live birth rate compared to treatment with expectant management in a stimulated cycle (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.10 to 3.44; 1 RCT, 342 women: moderate-quality evidence). If we assume the chance of a live birth with expectant management in a stimulated cycle was 13%, the chance of a live birth with IUI in a natural cycle would be between 14% and 34%. It is uncertain whether treatment with IUI in a natural cycle results in a lower multiple pregnancy rate compared to control (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.07 to 16.90; 1 RCT, 342 women; low-quality evidence). IUI in a stimulated cycle versus IUI in a natural cycle Treatment with IUI in a stimulated cycle may result in a higher cumulative live birth rate compared to treatment with IUI in a natural cycle (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.22 to 3.50; 4 RCTs, 396 women; I2 = 0%; low-quality evidence). If we assume the chance of a live birth with IUI in a natural cycle was 14%, the chance of a live birth with IUI in a stimulated cycle would be between 17% and 36%. It is uncertain whether treatment with IUI in a stimulated cycle results in a higher multiple pregnancy rate compared to control (OR 3.00, 95% CI 0.11 to 78.27; 2 RCTs, 65 women; low-quality evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Due to insufficient data, it is uncertain whether treatment with IUI with or without OH compared to timed intercourse or expectant management with or without OH improves cumulative live birth rates with acceptable multiple pregnancy rates in couples with unexplained subfertility. However, treatment with IUI with OH probably results in a higher cumulative live birth rate compared to expectant management without OH in couples with a low prediction score of natural conception. Similarly, treatment with IUI in a natural cycle probably results in a higher cumulative live birth rate compared to treatment with timed intercourse with OH. Treatment with IUI in a stimulated cycle may result in a higher cumulative live birth rate compared to treatment with IUI in a natural cycle

Emotional distress in women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 28 srudies

BACKGROUND For a number of reasons, the results of previous meta-analyses may not fully reflect the mental health status of the average woman suffering from polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), or the causes of this distress. Our objective was to examine emotional distress and its associated features in women with PCOS. METHODS A comprehensive meta-analysis of comparative studies reporting measures of depression, anxiety or emotional-subscales of quality of life (emoQoL) was performed. PubMed, Embase, PsychInfo and the Cochrane trial register databases were searched up to November 2011 (see Supplementary Data for PUBMED search string). Unpublished data obtained through contact with authors were also included. The standardized mean difference (SMD) of distress scores was calculated. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression analysis of methodological and PCOS-related features were performed. RESULTS Twenty-eight studies (2384 patients and 2705 control women) were included. Higher emotional distress was consistently found for women with PCOS compared with control populations [main outcomes: depression: 26 studies, SMD 0.60 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47–0.73), anxiety: 17 studies, SMD of 0.49 (95% CI 0.36–0.63), emoQoL: 8 studies, SMD −0.66 (95% CI −0.92 to −0.41)]. However, heterogeneity was present (I2 52–76%). Methodological and clinical aspects only partly explained effect size variation. CONCLUSIONS Women with PCOS exhibit significantly more emotional distress compared with women without PCOS. However, distress scores mostly remain within the normal range. The cause of emotional distress could only partly be explained by methodological or clinical features. Clinicians should be aware of the emotional aspects of PCOS, discuss these with patients and refer for appropriate support where necessary and in accordance with patient preference

Polycystic ovary syndrome and early-onset preeclampsia: reproductive manifestations of increased cardiovascular risk

Objective: Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in women is a major healthcare issue. Detection of premenopausal women with increased risk of CVD could enhance prevention strategies and reduce first event-related morbidity and mortality. In this study, we argue that an unfavorable metabolic constitution in women may present itself early in life as a reproductive complication, such as polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and preeclampsia. We evaluated the cardiovascular risk of women with a history of early-onset preeclampsia and women with PCOS and assessed their need for implementation of early risk factor-reduction strategies.Methods: We performed a standardized evaluation of 240 women with a history of early-onset preeclampsia and 456 women diagnosed with PCOS for established major CVD risk factors. Metabolic syndrome characteristics were analyzed per body mass index category.Results: Mean age was 30.6 and 29.0 years for women with preeclampsia and PCOS, respectively. High percentages of metabolic syndrome were found in both groups (preeclampsia group, 14.6%; and PCOS group, 18.4%), with an incidence of greater than 50% in both groups of women if body mass index was greater than 30 kg/m. Overall, more than 90% of the women qualified for either lifestyle or medical intervention according to the American Heart Association guideline for CVD prevention in women.Conclusions: Women with PCOS and early-onset preeclampsia already show an unfavorable cardiovascular risk profile with high need for lifestyle or medical intervention at a young age. We therefore recommend an active role of the gynecologist in routine screening and follow-up of women with reproductive conditions linked to future cardiovascular risk

Insulin action in women with polycystic ovary syndrome and its relation to gestational diabetes

STUDY QUESTION: How does insulin action change during pregnancy in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) who develop gestational diabetes (GDM) compared with women with PCOS who do not? SUMMARY ANSWER: Women with PCOS who develop GDM already show disturbed insulin action early in pregnancy. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Pregnant women with PCOS are at increased risk of developing GDM compared with women without PCOS. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This study represents a post hoc analysis of a subgroup of pregnant women with PCOS participating in a multicentre prospective cohort study. A total of 72 women were included. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Women with PCOS and a wish to conceive were included before conception and followed during pregnancy. Insulin, glucose, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) and testosterone were analysed at three different time points in women who developed GDM and women who did not. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Seventy-two pregnant women with PCOS were included of which 22 (31%) women developed GDM. Both insulin levels and HOMA-IR were significantly higher at each sampling point in women with PCOS who developed GDM. SHBG levels were significantly lower before conception and in the second trimester compared with women who did not develop GDM. Testosterone concentrations were significantly lower before conception in women who developed GDM. After adjusting for BMI, waist circumference and waist/hip ratio, the differences in insulin, HOMA-IR, SHBG and testosterone levels remained largely the same. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Selection bias cannot be excluded since only women from one centre with a complete blood sampling set were included in this study. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The knowledge that women with PCOS who develop GDM already have a disturbed insulin action early in pregnancy is likely to be useful in considering the pathophysiology processes underlying this disorder in this specific group of women

Placental characteristics in women with polycystic ovary syndrome

STUDY QUESTION: Are macroscopic and microscopic placental characteristics in a heterogeneous group of women diagnosed with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) different from those of a low-risk general population? SUMMARY ANSWER: Women with PCOS have significantly different microscopic placental characteristics compared with control women, independently from pregnancy complications. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Non-obese women with PCOS who conceived spontaneously have a significantly reduced placental volume and weight, with more chronic villitis and intervillositis compared with healthy controls. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A subset of a large prospective cohort study of pregnant women with PCOS was used. Healthy (low-risk) women who delivered at term after an uncomplicated pregnancy were used as the reference population. The placentas of 73 women with PCOS were analysed and compared with 209 placentas of healthy women. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Placentas were collected after delivery from women with PCOS who were followed from prior to conception until delivery. The placentas were macroscopically and microscopically analysed and compared with placentas of healthy women with either a spontaneous start of labour who delivered at term or who had an elective Caesarean section. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: After adjusting for potential confounders, placentas from women with PCOS showed more chorioamnionitis (P < 0.001), funisitis (P = 0.019), villitis (P = 0.045), thrombosis (P = 0.018), infarction (P = 0.010), villous immaturity (P = 0.009) and nucleated fetal red blood cells (P < 0.001). In a subgroup analysis, among women with and without pregnancy complications within the PCOS group, only the occurrence of thrombosis was increased in pregnancies complicated by pregnancy-induced hypertension or pre-eclampsia (30%, versus 0% in gestational diabetes pregnancies and 13% in uncomplicated pregnancies; P = 0.008). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: There might be a small proportion of women with PCOS in the reference group, since this group was not screened for PCOS. As a result, the observed difference may be an underestimation of the true difference. Placentas were stored for up to 72 h at 4°C, this is common practice but some degenerative changes cannot be ruled out absolutely. Also, there is possibility that baseline differences between the groups may in part explain some of the differences in placental pathology. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Our findings suggest that, in general, women with PCOS can have placental alterations associated with an increased hypoxic state, which seems not to be caused by the increased incidence of pregnancy complications. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This study was funded by the Child Health Research Program of the University Medical Centre Utrecht. The reference group was included as part of a study that was funded by a fellowship award of the European Society for Paediatric Infectious Diseases (ESPID 2005), The Wilhelmina Children's Hospital Research Fund (grant 2004.02), the Catharijne Stichting, the Dutch Asthma Foundation (grant 3.2.07.001) and the Alexandre Suerman Program (University Medical Center Utrecht). M.P.H.K., M.A.d.W., S.M.V.-V., M.L.H., P.G.J.N. and B.B.v.R. have nothing to disclose. B.C.J.M.F. has received fees and grant support from the following companies (in alphabetic order): Actavis, COGI, Euroscreen, Ferring, Finox, Genovum, Gedeon-Richter, Hartstichting, Merck Serono, NGI (Netherlands Genomic Initiative) Ova-Science, Pantharei Bioscience, PregLem, Roche, UMC Utrecht, Uteron and Watson Laboratories. The authors declare complete independence from funders. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT00821379. Trial registration date: 8 January 2013. First patient enrolment: 16 January 2013

Increased rates of complications in singleton pregnancies of women previously diagnosed with polycystic ovary syndrome predominantly in the hyperandrogenic phenotype

Objective To study the presence of several maternal and neonatal complications in a cohort of women with hyperandrogenic as well as normoandrogenic polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and women with PCOS who received different fertility treatments. Design Prospective multicenter cohort study. Setting Hospitals and midwifery practices. Patient(s) One hundred and eighty-eight women with PCOS and singleton pregnancies (study group) and 2,889 women with a naturally conceived singleton pregnancy (reference group). Intervention(s) Observational study. Main Outcome Measure(s) Maternal and neonatal pregnancy complications. Result(s) Women with PCOS had a statistically significantly increased risk of developing gestational diabetes (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 4.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.07–8.33) compared with the reference group, and their infants were more often born small for gestational age (AOR 3.76; 95% CI, 1.69–8.35). In a subgroup analysis, maternal complications were statistically significantly more often present in women with hyperandrogenic (defined as a free androgen index >4.5) PCOS (n = 76; 40% of all PCOS women) compared with those with normoandrogenic PCOS (n = 97; 52% of all PCOS women) (45% vs. 24%; P=.003); no statistically significant differences were observed between these groups regarding neonatal complications. Conclusion(s) Women with PCOS have an increased risk of maternal and neonatal pregnancy complications, especially women with the hyperandrogenic phenotype. Clinical Trial Registration Number NCT00821379