Successful treatment of idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis with combined immunosuppressive therapy

© 2019 Inst. Sci. inf., Univ. Defence in Belgrade. All rights reserved. Background/Aim. Idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis (IRF) is characterized by the fibroinflammatory periaortic tissue that affects the ureters, causing obstructive nephropathy and variable impairment of renal function. The findings strongly suggest an autoimmune etiology. The optimal treatment has not been established. The aim of this study was to analyze a long-term efficacy of combined corticosteroid therapy with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in the patients with IRF. Methods. We retrospectively followed 13 patients (8 males and 5 females) with IRF. All patients received corticosteroids and MMF. For the patients with severe renal failure, an initial ureteral decompression was made and prednisone was started orally 0.5 mg/kg with fast tapering. In cases with a mild renal failure corticosteroids were administrated as intravenous methylprednisolone pulses for 3 days, followed by oral prednisone. The dose of MMF was 1000 mg twice a day. MMF was stopped after 18 months and prednisone after 48 months. Results. Systemic symptoms resolved in all patients. Erythrocyte sedimentation (SE) rate declined from the mean of 67.6 to 26.3 mm/h and C-reactive protein (CRP) from the mean of 18.5 to 6.3 mg/L. In 7 out of 8 patients, the ureteral stents were successfully removed 13 weeks on average. Seven patients had 100% of reduction in the periaortic mass, and the average percent reduction was 76.9%. The kidney function improved and remained normal in 6 treated patients. In 4 patients a mild chronic renal failure remained due to afunction of one kidney. Three patients, with a prior chronic renal failure, did not get worse renal function. The disease recurred in 3 patients. There were no treatment side effects noted. Conclusion. Combination of corticosteroids and MMF is a potentially effective treatment in restoring the renal function and reducing the fibrotic tissue in the patients with idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis. It could prevent the need for ureteral stenting and surgery. Longer treatment may reduce a possibility of recurrence

Everolimus with Reduced Calcineurin Inhibitor Exposure in Renal Transplantation

Background Everolimus permits reduced calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) exposure, but the efficacy and safety outcomes of this treatment after kidney transplant require confirmation.Methods In a multicenter noninferiority trial, we randomized 2037 de novo kidney transplant recipients to receive, in combination with induction therapy and corticosteroids, everolimus with reduced-exposure CNI (everolimus arm) or mycophenolic acid (MPA) with standard-exposure CNI (MPA arm). The primary end point was treated biopsy-proven acute rejection or eGFR<50 ml/min per 1.73 m2 at post-transplant month 12 using a 10% noninferiority margin.Results In the intent-to-treat population (everolimus n=1022, MPA n=1015), the primary end point incidence was 48.2% (493) with everolimus and 45.1% (457) with MPA (difference 3.2%; 95% confidence interval, -1.3% to 7.6%). Similar between-treatment differences in incidence were observed in the subgroups of patients who received tacrolimus or cyclosporine. Treated biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, or death at post-transplant month 12 occurred in 14.9% and 12.5% of patients treated with everolimus and MPA, respectively (difference 2.3%; 95% confidence interval, -1.7% to 6.4%). De novo donor-specific antibody incidence at 12 months and antibody-mediated rejection rate did not differ between arms. Cytomegalovirus (3.6% versus 13.3%) and BK virus infections (4.3% versus 8.0%) were less frequent in the everolimus arm than in the MPA arm. Overall, 23.0% and 11.9% of patients treated with everolimus and MPA, respectively, discontinued the study drug because of adverse events.Conclusions In kidney transplant recipients at mild-to-moderate immunologic risk, everolimus was noninferior to MPA for a binary composite end point assessing immunosuppressive efficacy and preservation of graft function

Safety of Everolimus With Reduced Calcineurin Inhibitor Exposure in De Novo Kidney Transplants: An Analysis From the Randomized TRANSFORM Study

BACKGROUND: The safety profiles of standard therapy versus everolimus with reduced-exposure calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) therapy using contemporary protocols in de novo kidney transplant recipients have not been compared in detail. METHODS: TRANSFORM was a randomized, international trial in which de novo kidney transplant patients were randomized to everolimus with reduced-exposure CNI (N = 1014) or mycophenolic acid (MPA) with standard-exposure CNI (N = 1012), both with induction and corticosteroids. RESULTS: Within the safety population (everolimus 1014, MPA 1012), adverse events with a suspected relation to study drug occurred in 62.9% versus 59.2% of patients given everolimus or MPA, respectively (P = 0.085). Hyperlipidemia, interstitial lung disease, peripheral edema, proteinuria, stomatitis/mouth ulceration, thrombocytopenia, and wound healing complications were more frequent with everolimus, whereas diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, leukopenia, tremor, and insomnia were more frequent in the MPA group. The incidence of viral infections (17.2% versus 29.2%; P < 0.001), cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections (8.1% versus 20.1%; P < 0.001), CMV syndrome (13.6% versus 23.0%, P = 0.044), and BK virus (BKV) infections (4.3% versus 8.0%, P < 0.001) were less frequent with everolimus. CMV infection was less common with everolimus versus MPA after adjusting for prophylaxis therapy in the D+/R- subgroup (P < 0.001). Study drug was discontinued more frequently due to rejection or impaired healing with everolimus, and more often due to BKV infection or BKV nephropathy with MPA. CONCLUSIONS: De novo everolimus with reduced-exposure CNI yielded a comparable incidence, though a distinctly different pattern, of adverse events versus current standard of care. Both regimens are safe and effective, yet their distinct profiles may enable tailoring for individual kidney transplant recipients.status: publishe