Effective recruitment strategies for a sickle cell patient registry across sites from the Sickle Cell Disease Implementation Consortium (SCDIC)

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a genetic disorder predominantly affecting people of African descent and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. To improve SCD outcomes, the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute funded eight centers to participate in the SCD Implementation Consortium. Sites were required to each recruit 300 individuals with SCD, over 20 months. We aim to describe recruitment strategies and challenges encountered. Participants aged 15-45 years with confirmed diagnosis of SCD were eligible. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the effectiveness of each recruitment strategy. A total of 2432 participants were recruited. Majority (95.3%) were African American. Successful strategies were recruitment from clinics (68.1%) and affiliated sites (15.6%). Recruitment at community events, emergency departments and pain centers had the lowest yield. Challenges included saturation of strategies and time constraints. Effective recruitment of participants in multi-site studies requires multiple strategies to achieve adequate sample sizes

What does it mean to be affiliated with care?: Delphi consensus on the definition of unaffiliation and specialist in sickle cell disease

Accruing evidence reveals best practices for how to help individuals living with Sickle Cell Disease (SCD); yet, the implementation of these evidence-based practices in healthcare settings is lacking. The Sickle Cell Disease Implementation Consortium (SCDIC) is a national consortium that uses implementation science to identify and address barriers to care in SCD. The SCDIC seeks to understand how and why patients become unaffiliated from care and determine strategies to identify and connect patients to care. A challenge, however, is the lack of agreed-upon definition for what it means to be unaffiliated and what it means to be a SCD expert provider . In this study, we conducted a Delphi process to obtain expert consensus on what it means to be an unaffiliated patient with SCD and to define an SCD specialist, as no standard definition is available. Twenty-eight SCD experts participated in three rounds of questions. Consensus was defined as 80% or more of respondents agreeing. Experts reached consensus that an individual with SCD who is unaffiliated from care is someone who has not been seen by a sickle cell specialist in at least a year. A sickle cell specialist was defined as someone with knowledge and experience in SCD. Having knowledge means: being knowledgeable of the 2014 NIH Guidelines, Evidence-Based Management of SCD , trained in hydroxyurea management and transfusions, trained on screening for organ damage in SCD, trained in pain management and on SCD emergencies, and is aware of psychosocial and cognitive issues in SCD. Experiences that are expected of a SCD specialist include experience working with SCD patients, mentored by a SCD specialist, regular attendance at SCD conferences, and obtains continuing medical education on SCD every 2 years. The results have strong implications for future research, practice, and policy related to SCD by helping to lay a foundation for an new area of research (e.g., to identify subpopulations of unaffiliation and targeted interventions) and policies that support reaffiliation and increase accessibility to quality care

Examining mental health, education, employment, and pain in sickle cell disease

IMPORTANCE: Pain related to sickle cell disease (SCD) is complex and associated with social determinants of health. Emotional and stress-related effects of SCD impact daily quality of life and the frequency and severity of pain. OBJECTIVE: To explore the association of educational attainment, employment status, and mental health with pain episode frequency and severity among individuals with SCD. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a cross-sectional analysis of patient registry data collected at baseline (2017-2018) from patients treated at 8 sites of the US Sickle Cell Disease Implementation Consortium. Data analysis was performed from September 2020 to March 2022. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Electronic medical record abstraction and a participant survey provided demographic data, mental health diagnosis, and Adult Sickle Cell Quality of Life Measurement Information System pain scores. Multivariable regression was used to examine the associations of education, employment, and mental health with the main outcomes (pain frequency and pain severity). RESULTS: The study enrolled a total of 2264 participants aged 15 to 45 years (mean [SD] age, 27.9 [7.9] years; 1272 female participants [56.2%]) with SCD. Nearly one-half of the participant sample reported taking daily pain medication (1057 participants [47.0%]) and/or hydroxyurea use (1091 participants [49.2%]), 627 participants (28.0%) received regular blood transfusion, 457 (20.0%) had a depression diagnosis confirmed by medical record abstraction, 1789 (79.8%) reported severe pain (rated most recent pain crises as ≥7 out of 10), and 1078 (47.8%) reported more than 4 pain episodes in the prior 12 months. The mean (SD) pain frequency and severity t scores for the sample were 48.6 (11.4) and 50.3 (10.1), respectively. Educational attainment and income were not associated with increased pain frequency or severity. Unemployment (β, 2.13; 95% CI, 0.99 to 3.23; P \u3c .001) and female sex (β, 1.78; 95% CI, 0.80 to 2.76; P \u3c .001) were associated with increased pain frequency. Age younger than 18 years was inversely associated with pain frequency (β, -5.72; 95% CI, -7.72 to -3.72; P \u3c .001) and pain severity (β, 5.10; 95% CI, -6.70 to -3.51; P \u3c .001). Depression was associated with increased pain frequency (β, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.04 to 3.31; P \u3c .001) but not pain severity. Hydroxyurea use was associated with increased pain severity (β, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.47 to 2.24; P = .003), and daily use of pain medication was associated with both increased pain frequency (β, 6.29; 95% CI, 5.28 to 7.31; P \u3c .001) and pain severity (β, 2.87; 95% CI, 1.95 to 3.80; P \u3c .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that employment status, sex, age, and depression are associated with pain frequency among patients with SCD. Depression screening for these patients is warranted, especially among those experiencing higher pain frequency and severity. Comprehensive treatment and pain reduction must consider the full experiences of patients with SCD, including impacts on mental health

What does it mean to be affiliated with care?: Delphi consensus on the definition of "unaffiliation" and "specialist" in sickle cell disease.

Accruing evidence reveals best practices for how to help individuals living with Sickle Cell Disease (SCD); yet, the implementation of these evidence-based practices in healthcare settings is lacking. The Sickle Cell Disease Implementation Consortium (SCDIC) is a national consortium that uses implementation science to identify and address barriers to care in SCD. The SCDIC seeks to understand how and why patients become unaffiliated from care and determine strategies to identify and connect patients to care. A challenge, however, is the lack of agreed-upon definition for what it means to be unaffiliated and what it means to be a "SCD expert provider". In this study, we conducted a Delphi process to obtain expert consensus on what it means to be an "unaffiliated patient" with SCD and to define an "SCD specialist," as no standard definition is available. Twenty-eight SCD experts participated in three rounds of questions. Consensus was defined as 80% or more of respondents agreeing. Experts reached consensus that an individual with SCD who is unaffiliated from care is "someone who has not been seen by a sickle cell specialist in at least a year." A sickle cell specialist was defined as someone with knowledge and experience in SCD. Having "knowledge" means: being knowledgeable of the 2014 NIH Guidelines, "Evidence-Based Management of SCD", trained in hydroxyurea management and transfusions, trained on screening for organ damage in SCD, trained in pain management and on SCD emergencies, and is aware of psychosocial and cognitive issues in SCD. Experiences that are expected of a SCD specialist include experience working with SCD patients, mentored by a SCD specialist, regular attendance at SCD conferences, and obtains continuing medical education on SCD every 2 years." The results have strong implications for future research, practice, and policy related to SCD by helping to lay a foundation for an new area of research (e.g., to identify subpopulations of unaffiliation and targeted interventions) and policies that support reaffiliation and increase accessibility to quality care

Examining Mental Health, Education, Employment, and Pain in Sickle Cell Disease.

ImportancePain related to sickle cell disease (SCD) is complex and associated with social determinants of health. Emotional and stress-related effects of SCD impact daily quality of life and the frequency and severity of pain.ObjectiveTo explore the association of educational attainment, employment status, and mental health with pain episode frequency and severity among individuals with SCD.Design, setting, and participantsThis is a cross-sectional analysis of patient registry data collected at baseline (2017-2018) from patients treated at 8 sites of the US Sickle Cell Disease Implementation Consortium. Data analysis was performed from September 2020 to March 2022.Main outcomes and measuresElectronic medical record abstraction and a participant survey provided demographic data, mental health diagnosis, and Adult Sickle Cell Quality of Life Measurement Information System pain scores. Multivariable regression was used to examine the associations of education, employment, and mental health with the main outcomes (pain frequency and pain severity).ResultsThe study enrolled a total of 2264 participants aged 15 to 45 years (mean [SD] age, 27.9 [7.9] years; 1272 female participants [56.2%]) with SCD. Nearly one-half of the participant sample reported taking daily pain medication (1057 participants [47.0%]) and/or hydroxyurea use (1091 participants [49.2%]), 627 participants (28.0%) received regular blood transfusion, 457 (20.0%) had a depression diagnosis confirmed by medical record abstraction, 1789 (79.8%) reported severe pain (rated most recent pain crises as ≥7 out of 10), and 1078 (47.8%) reported more than 4 pain episodes in the prior 12 months. The mean (SD) pain frequency and severity t scores for the sample were 48.6 (11.4) and 50.3 (10.1), respectively. Educational attainment and income were not associated with increased pain frequency or severity. Unemployment (β, 2.13; 95% CI, 0.99 to 3.23; P < .001) and female sex (β, 1.78; 95% CI, 0.80 to 2.76; P < .001) were associated with increased pain frequency. Age younger than 18 years was inversely associated with pain frequency (β, -5.72; 95% CI, -7.72 to -3.72; P < .001) and pain severity (β, 5.10; 95% CI, -6.70 to -3.51; P < .001). Depression was associated with increased pain frequency (β, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.04 to 3.31; P < .001) but not pain severity. Hydroxyurea use was associated with increased pain severity (β, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.47 to 2.24; P = .003), and daily use of pain medication was associated with both increased pain frequency (β, 6.29; 95% CI, 5.28 to 7.31; P < .001) and pain severity (β, 2.87; 95% CI, 1.95 to 3.80; P < .001).Conclusions and relevanceThese findings suggest that employment status, sex, age, and depression are associated with pain frequency among patients with SCD. Depression screening for these patients is warranted, especially among those experiencing higher pain frequency and severity. Comprehensive treatment and pain reduction must consider the full experiences of patients with SCD, including impacts on mental health

What does it mean to be affiliated with care?: Delphi consensus on the definition of “unaffiliation” and “specialist” in sickle cell disease

Accruing evidence reveals best practices for how to help individuals living with Sickle Cell Disease (SCD); yet, the implementation of these evidence-based practices in healthcare settings is lacking. The Sickle Cell Disease Implementation Consortium (SCDIC) is a national consortium that uses implementation science to identify and address barriers to care in SCD. The SCDIC seeks to understand how and why patients become unaffiliated from care and determine strategies to identify and connect patients to care. A challenge, however, is the lack of agreed-upon definition for what it means to be unaffiliated and what it means to be a “SCD expert provider”. In this study, we conducted a Delphi process to obtain expert consensus on what it means to be an “unaffiliated patient” with SCD and to define an “SCD specialist, ” as no standard definition is available. Twenty-eight SCD experts participated in three rounds of questions. Consensus was defined as 80% or more of respondents agreeing. Experts reached consensus that an individual with SCD who is unaffiliated from care is “someone who has not been seen by a sickle cell specialist in at least a year.” A sickle cell specialist was defined as someone with knowledge and experience in SCD. Having “knowledge” means: being knowledgeable of the 2014 NIH Guidelines, “Evidence-Based Management of SCD”, trained in hydroxyurea management and transfusions, trained on screening for organ damage in SCD, trained in pain management and on SCD emergencies, and is aware of psychosocial and cognitive issues in SCD. Experiences that are expected of a SCD specialist include experience working with SCD patients, mentored by a SCD specialist, regular attendance at SCD conferences, and obtains continuing medical education on SCD every 2 years.” The results have strong implications for future research, practice, and policy related to SCD by helping to lay a foundation for an new area of research (e.g., to identify subpopulations of unaffiliation and targeted interventions) and policies that support reaffiliation and increase accessibility to quality care

Empagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

Background The effects of empagliflozin in patients with chronic kidney disease who are at risk for disease progression are not well understood. The EMPA-KIDNEY trial was designed to assess the effects of treatment with empagliflozin in a broad range of such patients. Methods We enrolled patients with chronic kidney disease who had an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of at least 20 but less than 45 ml per minute per 1.73 m(2) of body-surface area, or who had an eGFR of at least 45 but less than 90 ml per minute per 1.73 m(2) with a urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (with albumin measured in milligrams and creatinine measured in grams) of at least 200. Patients were randomly assigned to receive empagliflozin (10 mg once daily) or matching placebo. The primary outcome was a composite of progression of kidney disease (defined as end-stage kidney disease, a sustained decrease in eGFR to < 10 ml per minute per 1.73 m(2), a sustained decrease in eGFR of & GE;40% from baseline, or death from renal causes) or death from cardiovascular causes. Results A total of 6609 patients underwent randomization. During a median of 2.0 years of follow-up, progression of kidney disease or death from cardiovascular causes occurred in 432 of 3304 patients (13.1%) in the empagliflozin group and in 558 of 3305 patients (16.9%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64 to 0.82; P < 0.001). Results were consistent among patients with or without diabetes and across subgroups defined according to eGFR ranges. The rate of hospitalization from any cause was lower in the empagliflozin group than in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.78 to 0.95; P=0.003), but there were no significant between-group differences with respect to the composite outcome of hospitalization for heart failure or death from cardiovascular causes (which occurred in 4.0% in the empagliflozin group and 4.6% in the placebo group) or death from any cause (in 4.5% and 5.1%, respectively). The rates of serious adverse events were similar in the two groups. Conclusions Among a wide range of patients with chronic kidney disease who were at risk for disease progression, empagliflozin therapy led to a lower risk of progression of kidney disease or death from cardiovascular causes than placebo