EXPRESS: Statement on imaging and pulmonary hypertension from the Pulmonary Vascular Research Institute (PVRI)

Pulmonary hypertension is highly heterogeneous and despite treatment advances it remains a life shortening condition. There have been significant advances in imaging technologies, but despite evidence of their potential clinical utility practice remains variable, dependent in part on imaging availability and expertise. This statement summarises current and emerging imaging modalities and their potential role in the diagnosis and assessment of suspected pulmonary hypertension. It also includes a review of commonly encountered clinical and radiological scenarios, and imaging and modeling-based biomarkers. An expert panel was formed including clinicians, radiologists, imaging scientists and computational modelers. Section editors generated a series of summary statements 1based on a review of the literature and professional experience and following consensus review, a diagnostic algorithm and fifty five statements were agreed. The diagnostic algorithm and summary statements, emphasise the key role and added value of imaging in the diagnosis and assessment of pulmonary hypertension and highlight areas requiring further research

iCPET Calculator: A Web-Based Application to Standardize the Calculation of Alpha Distensibility in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vascular distensibility associates with right ventricular function and clinical outcomes in patients with unexplained dyspnea and pulmonary hypertension. Alpha distensibility coefficient is determined from a nonlinear fit to multipoint pressure-flow plots. Study aims were to (1) create and test a user-friendly tool to standardize analysis of exercise hemodynamics including distensibility, and (2) investigate changes in distensibility following treatment in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. METHODS AND RESULTS: Participants with an exercise right heart catherization were retrospectively identified from the University of Arizona Pulmonary Hypertension (UA PH) registry and split into a pulmonary arterial hypertension group, a comparator group, and a control group. Right ventricular function was quantified using the coupling ratio and diastolic stiffness. Prototypes of the invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing (iCPET) calculator were developed using Matlab, Python, and RShiny to ana-lyze exercise hemodynamics and alpha distensibility coefficient, α (%/mm Hg) from multipoint pressure flow plots. Interclass correlation coefficients were calculated for interplatform and interobserver variability in alpha. No significant bias in the intra-platform (Matlab versus RShiny; intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.996) or interobserver (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.982) comparison of alpha values. Afterload significantly decreased (P<0.05) with no change in alpha distensibility in the pulmonary arterial hypertension group at follow-up. The comparator group had no change in pressure, resistance or alpha distensibility. There were no significant changes in RV diastolic stiffness at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The interactive user interface in the iCPET calculator allows exploration of alpha distensibility using standardized methods. No significant change in alpha distensibility at follow-up suggests that alpha may be less modifiable in patients with long-standing pulmonary arterial hypertension. © 2023 The Authors.Open access journalThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at [email protected]

Increased RV:LV ratio on chest CT-angiogram in COVID-19 is a marker of adverse outcomes

Background: Right ventricular (RV) dilation has been used to predict adverse outcomes in acute pulmonary conditions. It has been used to categorize the severity of novel coronavirus infection (COVID-19) infection. Our study aimed to use chest CT-angiogram (CTA) to assess if increased RV dilation, quantified as an increased RV:LV (left ventricle) ratio, is associated with adverse outcomes in the COVID-19 infection, and if it occurs out of proportion to lung parenchymal disease. Results: We reviewed clinical, laboratory, and chest CTA findings in COVID-19 patients (n = 100), and two control groups: normal subjects (n = 10) and subjects with organizing pneumonia (n = 10). On a chest CTA, we measured basal dimensions of the RV and LV in a focused 4-chamber view, and dimensions of pulmonary artery (PA) and aorta (AO) at the PA bifurcation level. Among the COVID-19 cohort, a higher RV:LV ratio was correlated with adverse outcomes, defined as ICU admission, intubation, or death. In patients with adverse outcomes, the RV:LV ratio was 1.06 ± 0.10, versus 0.95 ± 0.15 in patients without adverse outcomes. Among the adverse outcomes group, compared to the control subjects with organizing pneumonia, the lung parenchymal damage was lower (22.6 ± 9.0 vs. 32.7 ± 6.6), yet the RV:LV ratio was higher (1.06 ± 0.14 vs. 0.89 ± 0.07). In ROC analysis, RV:LV ratio had an AUC = 0.707 with an optimal cutoff of RV:LV ≥ 1.1 as a predictor of adverse outcomes. In a validation cohort (n = 25), an RV:LV ≥ 1.1 as a cutoff predicted adverse outcomes with an odds ratio of 76:1. Conclusions: In COVID-19 patients, RV:LV ratio ≥ 1.1 on CTA chest is correlated with adverse outcomes. RV dilation in COVID-19 is out of proportion to parenchymal lung damage, pointing toward a vascular and/or thrombotic injury in the lungs. © 2022, The Author(s).Open access journalThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at [email protected]