Regional Vulnerability of the Corpus Callosum in the Context of Cardiovascular Risk.

Many factors outside of cardiovascular health can impact the structure of white matter. Identification of reliable and clinically meaningful biomarkers of the neural effects of systemic and cardiovascular health are needed to refine etiologic predictions. We examined whether the corpus callosum demonstrates regional vulnerability to systemic cardiovascular risk factors. Three hundred and ninety-four older adults without dementia completed brain MRI, neurobehavioral evaluations, and blood draws. A subset (n = 126, n = 128) of individuals had blood plasma analyzed for inflammatory markers of interest (IL-6 and TNF-alpha). Considering diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is a particularly reliable measure of white matter integrity, we utilized DTI to examine fractional anisotropy (FA) of anterior and posterior regions of the corpus callosum. Using multiple linear regression models, we simultaneously examined FA of the genu and the splenium to compare their associations with systemic and cardiovascular risk factors. Lower FA of the genu but not splenium was associated with greater systemic and cardiovascular risk, including higher systolic blood pressure (β = -0.17, p = .020), hemoglobin A1C (β = -0.21, p = .016) and IL-6 (β = -0.34, p = .005). FA of the genu was uniquely associated with cognitive processing speed (β = 0.20, p = .0015) and executive functioning (β = 0.15, p = .012), but not memory performances (β = 0.05, p = .357). Our results demonstrated differential vulnerability of the corpus callosum, such that frontal regions showed stronger, independent associations with biomarkers of systemic and cardiovascular health in comparison to posterior regions. Posterior white matter integrity may not reflect cardiovascular health. Clinically, these findings support the utility of examining the anterior corpus callosum as an indicator of cerebrovascular health

Multimodal lifestyle engagement patterns support cognitive stability beyond neuropathological burden

Abstract Background Modifiable lifestyle behaviors account for a large proportion of dementia risk. However, the combined contributions of multidomain lifestyle patterns to cognitive aging are poorly understood, as most studies have examined individual lifestyle behaviors in isolation and without neuropathological characterization. This study examined data-driven patterns of lifestyle behaviors across multiple domains among older adults and tested their associations with disease-specific neuropathological burden and cognitive decline. Methods Participants included 2059 older adults enrolled in the longitudinal Memory and Aging Project (MAP) at the Rush Alzheimer’s Disease Center; none of whom had dementia at baseline (73% no cognitive impairment (NCI), 27% mild cognitive impairment [MCI]). All participants completed cognitive testing annually. Lifestyle factors were measured during at least one visit and included (1) actigraphy-measured physical activity, as well as self-reported (2) sleep quality, (3) life space, (4) cognitive activities, (5) social activities, and (6) social network. A subset of participants (n = 791) had autopsy data for which burden of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), cerebrovascular disease (CVD), Lewy body disease, and hippocampal sclerosis/TDP-43 was measured. Latent profile analysis across all 2059 participants identified distinct subgroups (i.e., classes) of lifestyle patterns. Linear mixed-effects models examined relationships between lifestyle classes and global cognitive trajectories, with and without covarying for all neuropathologies. Classes were also compared on rates of incident MCI/dementia. Results Five classes were identified: Class 1Low Life Space (lowest lifestyle engagement), Class 2PA (high physical activity), Class 3Low Avg (low to average lifestyle engagement), Class 4Balanced (high average lifestyle engagement), and Class 5Social (large social network). Classes 4Balanced and 5Social had the lowest AD burden, and Class 2PA had the lowest CVD burden. Classes 2–5 had significantly less steep global cognitive decline compared to Class 1Low Life Space, with comparable effect sizes before and after covarying for neuropathological burden. Classes 4Balanced and 5Social exhibited the lowest rates of incident MCI/dementia. Conclusions Lifestyle behavior patterns among older adults account for differential rates of cognitive decline and clinical progression. Those with at least average engagement across all lifestyle domains exhibit greater cognitive stability after adjustment for neuropathology, highlighting the importance of engagement in multiple healthy lifestyle behaviors for later life cognitive health

Wearable Use in an Observational Study Among Older Adults: Adherence, Feasibility, and Effects of Clinicodemographic Factors.

IntroductionWearables have great potential to improve monitoring and delivery of physical activity interventions to older adults with downstream benefits to multisystem health and longevity; however, benefits obtained from wearables depend on their uptake and usage. Few studies have examined person-specific factors that relate to wearable adherence. We characterized adherence to using a wearable activity tracker for 30 days and examined associations between adherence and demographics, cognitive functioning, brain volumes, and technology familiarity among community-dwelling older adults.MethodsParticipants were 175 older adults enrolled in the UCSF Longitudinal Brain Aging Study who were asked to wear a FitbitTM Flex 2 during waking hours for 30 days. Sixty two of these participants were also asked to sync their devices to the Fitbit smartphone app daily to collect minute-level data. We calculated adherence to wearing the Fitbit daily (i.e., proportion of days with valid activity data) and adherence to daily device syncing (i.e., proportion of days with minute-level activity data). Participants also completed a brain MRI and in-person cognitive testing measuring memory, executive functioning, and processing speed. Spearman correlations, Wilcoxon rank sum tests, and logistic regression tested relationships between wearable adherence and clinicodemographic factors.ResultsParticipants wore the Fitbits for an average of 95% of study days and were 85% adherent to the daily syncing protocol. Greater adherence to wearing the device was related to female sex. Greater adherence to daily device syncing was related to better memory, independent of demographic factors. Wearable adherence was not significantly related to age, education, executive functioning, processing speed, brain gray matter volumes, or self-reported familiarity with technology. Participants reported little-to-no difficulty using the wearable and all reported willingness to participate in another wearable study in the future.ConclusionsOlder adults have overall high adherence to wearable use in the current study protocol. Person-specific factors, however, may represent potential barriers to equitable uptake of wearables for physical activity among older adults, including demographics and cognitive functioning. Future studies and clinical providers utilizing wearable activity trackers with older adults may benefit from implementation of reminders (e.g., texts, calls) for device use, particularly among men and individuals with memory impairment

Data-driven physical actigraphy patterns relate to cognitive and vascular health in older adults

Health benefits of physical activity (PA) are well known; however, specific PA patterns that relate most strongly to cognitive aging outcomes are poorly understood. We characterized latent profiles of PA among older adults and examined associations with cognition and vascular burden. 124 functionally normal older adults wore a Fitbit™ for 30 days. Daily average step count, sedentary time (0 steps/min), and high-intensity time (≥120 steps/min) were calculated. Participants completed neurocognitive testing assessing cognitive domains of executive functioning and memory; medical history, from which vascular burden (i.e., a count of cardiovascular conditions) was calculated; and brain MRI (n = 44). Subgroups with similar PA patterns were identified via latent profile analysis. Three latent PA classes emerged: Class 1Low PA (n = 49), Class 2Average PA (n = 59), and Class 3High-intensity PA (n = 16). PA class related to executive functioning and vascular burden, driven by better outcomes in Class 3 than Class 1. Sex-stratified analyses revealed these associations were strongest in males. Post hoc analyses showed a positive association between high-intensity PA and white matter integrity among males. High-intensity PA related to better cognitive and vascular health, particularly among males. Findings inform physical activity-specific and person-specific recommendations for optimal cognitive aging

Supplemental Material - Regional Vulnerability of the Corpus Callosum in the Context of Cardiovascular Risk

Supplemental Material for Regional Vulnerability of the Corpus Callosum in the Context of Cardiovascular Risk by Anna M. VandeBunte, Corrina Fonseca, Emily W. Paolillo, Eva Gontrum, Shannon Y. Lee, Joel H. Kramer, and Kaitlin B. Casaletto in Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology</p