Does a Dose Calculator as an Add-On to a Web-Based Paediatric Formulary Reduce Calculation Errors in Paediatric Dosing? A Non-Randomized Controlled Study

OBJECTIVES: The structured digital dosing guidelines of the web-based Dutch Paediatric Formulary provided the opportunity to develop an integrated paediatric dose calculator. In a simulated setting, we tested the ability of this calculator to reduce calculation errors. METHODS: Volunteer healthcare professionals were allocated to one of two groups, manual calculation versus the use of the dose calculator. Professionals in both groups were given access to a web-based questionnaire with 14 patient cases for which doses had to be calculated. The effect of group allocation on the probability of making a calculation error was determined using generalized estimated equations (GEE) logistic regression analysis. The causes of all the erroneous calculations were evaluated. RESULTS: Seventy-seven healthcare professionals completed the web-based questionnaire: thirty-seven were allocated to the manual group and 40 to the calculator group. Use of the dose calculator resulted in an estimated mean probability of a calculation error of 24.4% (95% CI 16.3-34.8) versus 39.0% (95% CI 32.4-46.1) with use of manual calculation. The mean difference of probability of calculation error between groups was 14.6% (95% CI 3.1-26.2; p =

Chloroquine dosing recommendations for pediatric COVID-19 supported by modeling and simulation

As chloroquine (CHQ) is part of the Dutch Centre for Infectious Disease Control COVID-19 experimental treatment guideline, pediatric dosing guidelines are needed. Recent pediatric data suggest that existing WHO dosing guidelines for children with malaria are suboptimal. The aim of our study was to establish best-evidence to inform pediatric CHQ doses for children infected with COVID-19. A previously developed physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for CHQ was used to simulate exposure in adults and children and verified against published pharmacokinetic data. The COVID-19 recommended adult dosage regimen of 44mg/kg total was tested in adults and children to evaluate the extent of variation in exposure. Based on differences in AUC0-70h the optimal CHQ dose was determined in children of different ages compared to adults. Revised doses were re-introduced into the model to verify that overall CHQ exposure in each age band was within 5% of the predicted adult value. Simulations showed differences in drug exposure in children of different ages and adults when the same body-weight based dose is given. As such, we propose the following total cumulative doses: 35 mg/kg (CHQ base) for children 0-1 month, 47 mg/kg for 1-6 months, 55 mg/kg for 6 months-12 years and 44 mg/kg for adolescents and adults, not to exceed 3300 mg in any patient. Our study supports age-adjusted CHQ dosing in children with COVID-19 in order to avoid suboptimal or toxic doses. The knowledge-driven, model-informed dose selection paradigm can serve as a science-

A New Framework to Implement Model-Informed Dosing in Clinical Guidelines: Piperacillin and Amikacin as Proof of Concept

Background: Modeling and simulation is increasingly used to study pediatric pharmacokinetics, but clinical implementation of age-appropriate doses lags behind. Therefore, we aimed to develop model-informed doses using published pharmacokinetic data and a decision framework to adjust dosing guidelines based on these doses, using piperacillin and amikacin in critically ill children as proof of concept. Methods: Piperacillin and amikacin pharmacokinetic models in critically ill children were extracted from literature. Concentration-time profiles were simulated for various dosing regimens for a virtual PICU patient dataset, including the current DPF dose and doses proposed in the studied publications. Probability of target attainment (PTA) was compared between the different dosing regimens. Next, updated dosing recommendations for the DPF were proposed, and evaluated using a new framework based on PK study quality and benefit-risk analysis of clinical implementation. Results: Three studies for piperacillin (

A step-by-step guide for safe off-label prescribing

Item does not contain fulltextThe Dutch Medicines Act and the Medical Treatment Contracts Act (WGBO) form the legal framework for off-label prescribing. These acts are complemented with position statements and guidelines of professional organizations. However, this legal framework is not yet sufficiently embedded in daily practice. The explicit translation of the legal conditions into practical stepwise guidance can therefore provide important guidance when prescribing off-label. This article describes a step-by-step guide for responsible off-label prescribing. The step-by-step guide ensures that decisions about off-label use of drugs are made based on a deliberate and explicit consideration of the unmet medical need and alternative treatment strategies against the potential risks and benefits for the individual patient. In addition, the step-by-step guide ensures the correct provision of information to patients. In this way, the step-by-step guide enables the doctor to meet the regulatory requirements on the off-label prescription of drugs. In addition, we need better information provision on off-label use and professional consensus on information and consent obligation in order to be able to prescribe even more effectively off-label

Guiding future paediatric drug studies based on existing pharmacokinetic and efficacy data: Cardiovascular drugs as a proof of concept

Introduction: Off-label drug use in the paediatric population is common, and the lack of high-quality efficacy studies poses patients at risk for failing pharmacotherapy. Next to efficacy studies, pharmacokinetic (PK) studies are increasingly used to inform paediatric dose selection. As resources for paediatric trials are limited, we aimed to summarize existing PK and efficacy studies to identify knowledge gaps in available evidence supporting paediatric dosing recommendations, thereby taking paediatric cardiovascular drugs as proof of concept. Methods: For each cardiovascular drug, paediatric indication and prespecified age group, together comprising one record, the authorized state was assessed. Next, for off-label records, the highest level of evidence was scored. High-quality efficacy studies were defined as meta-analysis or randomized controlled trials. Other comparative research, noncomparative research or consensus-based expert opinions were considered low quality. The level of evidence for PK studies was scored per drug and per age group, but regardless of indication. Results: A total of 58 drugs included 417 records, of which 279 (67%) were off-label. Of all off-label records, the majority (81%) were not supported by high-quality efficacy studies, but for 140 of these records (62%) high-quality PK studies were available. Conclusion: We demonstrated that for the majority of off-label cardiovascular drugs, only low-quality efficacy studies were available. However, high-quality PK studies were frequently available. Combining these PK data with extrapolation of efficacy data from adults may help to close the current information gap and prioritize the drugs for which clinical studies and safety data are urgently needed

Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Neuropathic and Mixed Pain in Children and Adolescents: Results of a Survey Study amongst Practitioners

Contains fulltext : 228523.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access

Development of Best Evidence Dosing Recommendations for Term and Preterm Neonates (NeoDose Project)

Many drugs are used off-label in neonates which leads to large variation in prescribed drugs and dosages in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). The NeoDose project aimed to develop best evidence dosing recommendations (DRs) for term and preterm neonates using a three-step approach: 1) drug selection, 2) establishing consensus-based DRs, and 3) establishing best evidence DRs. Methods: The selection of drugs was based on frequency of prescribing, availability of a neonatal DR in the Dutch Pediatric Formulary, and the labeling status. Clinical need, pharmacological diversity, and Working Group Neonatal Pharmacology (WGNP) preferences were also taken into account, using a consensus-based approach. For the second step, we requested local dosing protocols from all ten Dutch NICUs and established consensus-based DRs within the WGNP, consisting of neonatologists, clinical pharmacologists, hospital pharmacists, and researchers. In the third step, the consensus-based DRs were compared with the available literature, using standardized PubMed searches. Results: Fourteen drugs were selected for which the local dosing protocols were collected. These protocols differed mostly in total daily dose, dosing frequency, and/or route of administration. Strikingly, almost none of the dosing protocols of these 14 drugs distinguished between preterm and term neonates. The working group established consensus-based DRs, which after literature review needed modification in 56%, mainly in terms of a dose increase. Finally, we established 37 best evidence DRs, 22 for preterm and 15 for term neonates, representing 19 indications. Conclusion: This project showed the successful three-step approach for the development of DRs for term and preterm neonates

Benefit-Risk Assessment of Off-Label Drug Use in Children

A drug is granted a license for use after a thorough assessment of risks and benefits based on high-quality scientific proof of its efficacy and safety. Many drugs that are relevant to children are not licensed for use in this population implying that a thorough assessment of risks and benefits in the pediatric population has not been made at all, implying a negative risk-benefit balance in children, or implying insufficient information to establish the risk-benefit balance. Use of drugs without positive assessment of risks and benefits exposes children to potential lack of efficacy, unknown toxicity, and harm. To aid guideline committees and individual prescribers, we here present a tutorial of the Benefit and Risk Assessment for Off-label use (BRAvO) decision framework. This pragmatic framework offers a structured assessment of benefits and risks of off-label drug use, including a clinical pharmacological based approach to age-appropriate dose selection. As proof of concept and to illustrate the practical use, we have applied the framework to assess benefits and risks of off-label use of ondansetron for gastroenteritis-induced nausea and vomiting. The framework could also guide decisions on off-label use in other special populations (e.g., pregnant women, elderly, obese, or critically ill patients) where off-label drug use is frequent, thereby contributing to effective and safe pharmacotherapy.</p

Neonatal Drug Formularies—A Global Scope

Neonatal drug information (DI) is essential for safe and effective pharmacotherapy in (pre)term neonates. Such information is usually absent from drug labels, making formularies a crucial part of the neonatal clinician’s toolbox. Several formularies exist worldwide, but they have never been fully mapped or compared for content, structure and workflow. The objective of this review was to identify neonatal formularies, explore (dis)similarities, and raise awareness of their existence. Neonatal formularies were identified through self-acquaintance, experts and structured search. A questionnaire was sent to all identified formularies to provide details on formulary function. An original extraction tool was employed to collect DI from the formularies on the 10 most commonly used drugs in pre(term) neonates. Eight different neonatal formularies were identified worldwide (Europe, USA, Australia-New Zealand, Middle East). Six responded to the questionnaire and were compared for structure and content. Each formulary has its own workflow, monograph template and style, and update routine. Focus on certain aspects of DI also varies, as well as the type of initiative and funding. Clinicians should be aware of the various formularies available and their differences in characteristics and content to use them properly for the benefit of their patients