43 research outputs found
You are never alone:Understanding the educational potential of an ‘urban solo’ in promoting place-responsiveness
Neurophysiologic effects of spinal manipulation in patients with chronic low back pain
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>While there is growing evidence for the efficacy of SM to treat LBP, little is known on the mechanisms and physiologic effects of these treatments. Accordingly, the purpose of this study was to determine whether SM alters the amplitude of the motor evoked potential (MEP) or the short-latency stretch reflex of the erector spinae muscles, and whether these physiologic responses depend on whether SM causes an audible joint sound.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We used transcranial magnetic stimulation to elicit MEPs and electromechanical tapping to elicit short-latency stretch reflexes in 10 patients with chronic LBP and 10 asymptomatic controls. Neurophysiologic outcomes were measured before and after SM. Changes in MEP and stretch reflex amplitude were examined based on patient grouping (LBP vs. controls), and whether SM caused an audible joint sound.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>SM did not alter the erector spinae MEP amplitude in patients with LBP (0.80 ± 0.33 vs. 0.80 ± 0.30 μV) or in asymptomatic controls (0.56 ± 0.09 vs. 0.57 ± 0.06 μV). Similarly, SM did not alter the erector spinae stretch reflex amplitude in patients with LBP (0.66 ± 0.12 vs. 0.66 ± 0.15 μV) or in asymptomatic controls (0.60 ± 0.09 vs. 0.55 ± 0.08 μV). Interestingly, study participants exhibiting an audible response exhibited a 20% decrease in the stretch reflex (p < 0.05).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>These findings suggest that a single SM treatment does not systematically alter corticospinal or stretch reflex excitability of the erector spinae muscles (when assessed ~ 10-minutes following SM); however, they do indicate that the stretch reflex is attenuated when SM causes an audible response. This finding provides insight into the mechanisms of SM, and suggests that SM that produces an audible response may mechanistically act to decrease the sensitivity of the muscle spindles and/or the various segmental sites of the Ia reflex pathway.</p
Pain, pain intensity and pain disability in high school students are differently associated with physical activity, screening hours and sleep
Background: Studies exploring the association between physical activity, screen time and sleep and pain usually
focus on a limited number of painful body sites. Nevertheless, pain at different body sites is likely to be of different
nature. Therefore, this study aims to explore and compare the association between time spent in self-reported
physical activity, in screen based activities and sleeping and i) pain presence in the last 7-days for 9 different body
sites; ii) pain intensity at 9 different body sites and iii) global disability.
Methods: Nine hundred sixty nine students completed a questionnaire on pain, time spent in moderate and
vigorous physical activity, screen based time watching TV/DVD, playing, using mobile phones and computers and
sleeping hours. Univariate and multivariate associations between pain presence, pain intensity and disability and
physical activity, screen based time and sleeping hours were investigated.
Results: Pain presence: sleeping remained in the multivariable model for the neck, mid back, wrists, knees and
ankles/feet (OR 1.17 to 2.11); moderate physical activity remained in the multivariate model for the neck, shoulders,
wrists, hips and ankles/feet (OR 1.06 to 1.08); vigorous physical activity remained in the multivariate model for mid
back, knees and ankles/feet (OR 1.05 to 1.09) and screen time remained in the multivariate model for the low back
(OR = 2.34. Pain intensity: screen time and moderate physical activity remained in the multivariable model for pain
intensity at the neck, mid back, low back, shoulder, knees and ankles/feet (Rp2 0.02 to 0.04) and at the wrists
(Rp2 = 0.04), respectively. Disability showed no association with sleeping, screen time or physical activity.
Conclusions: This study suggests both similarities and differences in the patterns of association between time
spent in physical activity, sleeping and in screen based activities and pain presence at 8 different body sites. In
addition, they also suggest that the factors associated with the presence of pain, pain intensity and pain associated
disability are different