Adverse drug reactions in a primary care population prescribed non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Objective. To determine how often patients with musculoskeletal (MSK) complaints prescribed a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) subsequently consult their general practitioner (GP) with a non-serious adverse drug reaction (ADR). Design. Cohort study. Setting. A healthcare database containing the electronic GP medical records of over 1.5 million patients throughout the Netherlands. Patients. A total of 16 626 adult patients with MSK complaints prescribed an NSAID. Main outcome measures. The patients' medical records were manually assessed for the duration of NSAID use for a maximum of two months, and consultations for complaints predefined as potential ADRs were identified. Subsequently, the likelihood of an association with the NSAID use was assessed and these potential ADRs were categorized as likely, possible, or unlikely ADRs. Results. In total, 961 patients (6%) consulted their GP with 1227 non-serious potential ADRs. In 174 patients (1%) at least one of these was categorized as a likely ADR, and in a further 408 patients (2.5%) at least one was categorized as a possible ADR. Dyspepsia was the most frequent likely ADR, followed by diarrhoea and dyspnoea (respectively 34%, 8%, and 8% of all likely ADRs). Conclusion. Of the patients with MSK complaints prescribed an NSAID, almost one in 30 patients re-consulted their GP with a complaint likely or possibly associated with the use of this drug. The burden of such consultations for non-serious ADRs should be taken into account by GPs when deciding whether treatment with an NSAID is appropriate

Suboptimal gastroprotective coverage of NSAID use and the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding and ulcers: An observational study using three European databases

Background: Gastro-protective agents (GPA) are co-prescribed with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) to lower the risk of upper gastrointestinal (UGI) events. It is unknown to what extent the protective effect is influenced by therapy adherence. Aim: To study the association between GPA adherence and UGI events among non-selective (ns) NSAID users. Methods: The General Practice Research Database (UK 1998e2008), the Integrated Primary Care Information database (the Netherlands 1996-2007) and the Health Search/CSD Longitudinal Patient Database (Italy 2000-2007) were used. A nested case-control design was employed within a cohort of nsNSAID users aged ≥50 years, who also used a GPA. UGI event cases (UGI bleeding and/or symptomatic ulcer with/without obstruction/perforation) were matched to event-free members of the cohort for age, sex, database and calendar time. Adherence to GPA was calculated as the proportion of nsNSAID treatment days covered by a GPA prescription. Adjusted OR with 95% CI were calculated. Results: The cohort consisted of 618 684 NSAID users, generating 1 107 266 nsNSAID episodes. Of these, 117 307 (10.6%) were (partly) covered by GPA, 4.9% of which with a GPA coverage 80% (full adherence). 339 patients experienced an event. Among non-adherers, the OR was 2.39 (95% CI 1.66 to 3.44) for all UGI events and 1.89 (95% CI 1.09 to 3.28) for UGI bleeding alone, compared to full adherers. Conclusions: The risk of UGI events was significantly higher in nsNSAID users with GPA non-adherence. This underlines the importance of strategies to improve GPA adherence. Copyright Article author (or their employer) 2011

Prevalence and incidence rate of hospital admissions related to medication between 2008 and 2013 in The Netherlands

PURPOSE: In 2009 a Dutch guideline was published containing recommendations to reduce Hospital Admissions Related to Medications (HARMs). This study aims to examine time-trends of HARMs and their potential preventability between 2008 and 2013 in The Netherlands. METHODS: A retrospective prevalence study was conducted using the Dutch PHARMO Database Network. A semi-automated pre-selection was used to make a crude identification of possible HARMs of which four samples were selected. These were independently assessed with respect to causality and potential preventability by a physician and pharmacist. The results were stratified by age into 18-64 years and 65 years and older. For these groups the net prevalences and incidence rates of HARMs and potentially preventable HARMs were calculated for the years 2008, 2009, 2011 and 2013. RESULTS: Four samples of 467 (2008), 447 (2009), 446 (2011) and 408 (2013) admissions were assessed. The net prevalence of HARMs in the 18-64 years group was approximately four times smaller compared to the older group with a mean prevalence of 2.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]:2.4%-3.0%) and 10.2% (95%CI: 9.7%-10.7%) respectively. The potential preventability was 25.1% (18.4%-31.8%) and 48.3% (95%CI: 44.8%-51.8%), respectively. The prevalence of HARMs in both groups did not change significantly between 2008 and 2013 with 2.4% (95%CI: 1.9%-3.0%) and 10.0% (95%CI: 9.0%-11.0%) in 2008 and 3.1% (2.7%-3.5%) and 10.4% (95%CI: 9.4%-11.4%) in 2013, respectively. CONCLUSION: Despite efforts to reduce HARMs, the prevalence did not decrease over time. Additional measures are therefore necessary, especially in the elderly population

Prevalence and incidence rate of hospital admissions related to medication between 2008 and 2013 in The Netherlands

Purpose: In 2009 a Dutch guideline was published containing recommendations to reduce Hospital Admissions Related to Medications (HARMs). This study aims to examine

Population-based analysis of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use among children in four European countries in the SOS project: What size of data platforms and which study designs do we need to assess safety issues?

Background: Data on utilization patterns and safety of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in children are scarce. The purpose of this study was to investigate the utilization of NSAIDs among children in four European countries as part of the Safety Of non-Steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (SOS) project.Methods: We used longitudinal patient data from seven databases (GePaRD, IPCI, OSSIFF, Pedianet, PHARMO, SISR, and THIN) to calculate prevalence rates of NSAID use among children (0-18 years of age) from Germany, Italy, Netherlands, and United Kingdom. All databases contained a representative population sample and recorded demographics, diagnoses, and drug prescriptions. Prevalence rates of NSAID use were stratified by age, sex, and calendar time. The person-time of NSAID exposure was calculated by using the duration of the prescription supply. We calculated incidence rates for serious adverse events of interest. For these adverse events of interest, sample size calculations were conducted (alpha = 0.05; 1-beta = 0.8) to determine the amount of NSAID exposure time that would be required for safety studies in children.Results: The source population comprised 7.7 million children with a total of 29.6 million person-years of observation. Of those, 1.3 million children were exposed to at least one of 45 NSAIDs during observation time. Overall prevalence rates of NSAID use in children differed across countries, ranging from 4.4 (Italy) to 197 (Germany) per 1000 person-years in 2007. For Germany, United Kingdom, and Italian pediatricians, we observed high rates of NSAID use among children aged one to four years. For all four countries, NSAID use increased with older age categories for children older than 11. In this analysis, only for ibuprofen (the most frequently used NSAID), enough exposure was available to detect a weak association (relative risk of 2) between exposure and asthma exacerbation (the most common serious adverse event of interest).Conclusions: Patterns of NSAID use in children were heterogeneous across four European countries. The SOS project platform captures data on more than 1.3 million children who were exposed to NSAIDs. Even larger data platforms and the use of advanced versions of case-only study designs may be needed to conclusively assess the safety of these drugs in children

Risk of acute myocardial infarction during use of individual NSAIDs: A nested case-control study from the SOS project

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the risk of AMI for individual NSAIDs.METHODS: A nested case-control study was performed from a cohort of new NSAID users ≥18 years (1999-2011) match

Use and Safety of Non-Steroidal Inflammatory Drugs and Aspirin

The use of acetylsalicylic acid, better known as aspirin, dates back to the Egyptians in 1534 BC. Aspirin-like compounds are naturally derived from willow tree bark and myr-tle. At the end of the 19th century aspirin was patented by Bayer as the world’s first syn-thetic drug. The recommended use was pain management. In 1968 it was shown that aspirin inhibited human platelet aggregation. Since 1974 it has been recognized that aspirin use is beneficial in the secondary prevention of myocardial infarction and stroke. As cardiovascular (CV) disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in modern Europe and North-America, the use of aspirin has gained enormous popularity. It has been established that long term use of low-dose aspirin (between 75 to 100 mg per day) can reduce the risk of vascular events with 25%, primarily by acting as platelet aggrega-tion inhibitor. Aspirin is mostly recommended for secondary prevention, however is also considered for primary prevention of CV events in high-risk patients, depending on the number of CV risk factors such as age, sex, life-style and comorbidities. Despite clear evidence supporting the preventive effects of aspirin, and despite the growing burden of CV disease worldwide, aspirin is reportedly underutilized in patients who are at high risk of developing CV events. Approximately 9.6% of adults in the UK in 2006 were preva-lent users of aspirin. This percentage was lower in younger subjects and increased with age to 35% of people over the age of 75. In the Netherlands, which counts 16.5 million inhabitants, more than 1.1 million people treated with low-dose aspirin with 8 million aspirin prescriptions in 2010 (Figure 1.1). The annual related costs of aspirin use were 56 million euro’s in the Netherlands also in 2010 (Figure 1.2)

Risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding associated with low-dose aspirin

Low-dose aspirin use is associated with an increased risk for gastrointestinal ulceration and bleeding. At-risk low-dose aspirin users are therefore recommended to take proton-pump inhibitors. However, it is poorly understood which aspirin users are at risk to develop such complications. It is assumed that the known risk factors for NSAID-induced upper gastrointestinal events also apply to low-dose aspirin users. The conventional risk factors for upper gastrointestinal complications associated with aspirin therapy include: (1) a history of peptic ulcer disease or gastrointestinal bleeding, (2) older age, (3) concomitant use of NSAIDs, including coxibs, (4) concomitant use of anticoagulants or other platelet aggregation inhibitors, (5) the presence of severe co-morbidities, and (6) high aspirin dose. In patients with a history of peptic ulcer disease, Helicobacter pylori infection should be assessed and treated. This review focuses on the evidence for upper gastrointestinal risk factors in aspirin users. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved