4,211 research outputs found
Relaxed Byzantine Vector Consensus
Exact Byzantine consensus problem requires that non-faulty processes reach
agreement on a decision (or output) that is in the convex hull of the inputs at
the non-faulty processes. It is well-known that exact consensus is impossible
in an asynchronous system in presence of faults, and in a synchronous system,
n>=3f+1 is tight on the number of processes to achieve exact Byzantine
consensus with scalar inputs, in presence of up to f Byzantine faulty
processes. Recent work has shown that when the inputs are d-dimensional vectors
of reals, n>=max(3f+1,(d+1)f+1) is tight to achieve exact Byzantine consensus
in synchronous systems, and n>= (d+2)f+1 for approximate Byzantine consensus in
asynchronous systems.
Due to the dependence of the lower bound on vector dimension d, the number of
processes necessary becomes large when the vector dimension is large. With the
hope of reducing the lower bound on n, we consider two relaxed versions of
Byzantine vector consensus: k-Relaxed Byzantine vector consensus and
(delta,p)-Relaxed Byzantine vector consensus. In k-relaxed consensus, the
validity condition requires that the output must be in the convex hull of
projection of the inputs onto any subset of k-dimensions of the vectors. For
(delta,p)-consensus the validity condition requires that the output must be
within distance delta of the convex hull of the inputs of the non-faulty
processes, where L_p norm is used as the distance metric. For
(delta,p)-consensus, we consider two versions: in one version, delta is a
constant, and in the second version, delta is a function of the inputs
themselves.
We show that for k-relaxed consensus and (delta,p)-consensus with constant
delta>=0, the bound on n is identical to the bound stated above for the
original vector consensus problem. On the other hand, when delta depends on the
inputs, we show that the bound on n is smaller when d>=3
Parameter-independent Iterative Approximate Byzantine Consensus
In this work, we explore iterative approximate Byzantine consensus algorithms
that do not make explicit use of the global parameter of the graph, i.e., the
upper-bound on the number of faults, f
Byzantine Vector Consensus in Complete Graphs
Consider a network of n processes each of which has a d-dimensional vector of
reals as its input. Each process can communicate directly with all the
processes in the system; thus the communication network is a complete graph.
All the communication channels are reliable and FIFO (first-in-first-out). The
problem of Byzantine vector consensus (BVC) requires agreement on a
d-dimensional vector that is in the convex hull of the d-dimensional input
vectors at the non-faulty processes. We obtain the following results for
Byzantine vector consensus in complete graphs while tolerating up to f
Byzantine failures:
* We prove that in a synchronous system, n >= max(3f+1, (d+1)f+1) is
necessary and sufficient for achieving Byzantine vector consensus.
* In an asynchronous system, it is known that exact consensus is impossible
in presence of faulty processes. For an asynchronous system, we prove that n >=
(d+2)f+1 is necessary and sufficient to achieve approximate Byzantine vector
consensus.
Our sufficiency proofs are constructive. We show sufficiency by providing
explicit algorithms that solve exact BVC in synchronous systems, and
approximate BVC in asynchronous systems.
We also obtain tight bounds on the number of processes for achieving BVC
using algorithms that are restricted to a simpler communication pattern
- …