Intensified surveillance after surgery for colorectal cancer significantly improves survival

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Postoperative surveillance after curative resection for colorectal cancer has been demostrated to improve survival. It remains unknown however, whether intensified surveillance provides a significant benefit regarding outcome and survival. This study was aimed at comparing different surveillance strategies regarding their effect on long-term outcome.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Between 1990 and 2006, all curative resections for colorectal cancer were selected from our prospective colorectal cancer database. All patients were offered to follow our institution's surveillance programm according to the ASCO guidelines. We defined surveillance as "intensive" in cases where > 70% appointments were attended and the program was completed. As "minimal" we defined surveillance with < 70% of the appointments attended and an incomplete program. As "none" we defined the group which did not take part in any surveillance.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Out of 1469 patients 858 patients underwent "intensive", 297 "minimal" and 314 "none" surveillance. The three groups were well balanced regarding biographical data and tumor characteristics. The 5-year survival rates were 79% (intensive), 76% (minimal) and 54% (none) (OR 1.480, (95% CI 1.135-1.929); <it>p </it>< 0.0001), respectively. The 10-year survival rates were 65% (intensive), 50% (minimal) and 31% (none) (<it>p </it>< 0.0001), respectively. With a median follow-up of 70 months the median time of survival was 191 months (intensive), 116 months (minimal) and 66 months (none) (<it>p </it>< 0.0001). After recurrence, the 5-year survival rates were 32% (intensive, <it>p </it>= 0.034), 13% (minimal, <it>p </it>= 0.001) and 19% (none, <it>p </it>= 0.614). The median time of survival after recurrence was 31 months (intensive, <it>p </it>< 0.0001), 21 months (minimal, <it>p </it>< 0.0001) and 16 month (none, <it>p </it>< 0.0001) respectively.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Intensive surveillance after curative resection of colorectal cancer improves survival. In cases of recurrent disease, intensive surveillance has a positive impact on patients' prognosis. Large randomized, multicenter trials are needed to substantiate these results.</p

The HubBLe trial: haemorrhoidal artery ligation (HAL) versus rubber band ligation (RBL) for haemorrhoids

BACKGROUND:Haemorrhoids (piles) are a very common condition seen in surgical clinics. After exclusion of more sinister causes of haemorrhoidal symptoms (rectal bleeding, perianal irritation and prolapse), the best option for treatment depends upon persistence and severity of the symptoms. Minor symptoms often respond to conservative treatment such as dietary fibre and reassurance. For more severe symptoms treatment such as rubber band ligation may be therapeutic and is a very commonly performed procedure in the surgical outpatient setting. Surgery is usually reserved for those who have more severe symptoms, as well as those who do not respond to non-operative therapy; surgical techniques include haemorrhoidectomy and haemorrhoidopexy. More recently, haemorrhoidal artery ligation has been introduced as a minimally invasive, non destructive surgical option.There are substantial data in the literature concerning efficacy and safety of ’rubber band ligation including multiple comparisons with other interventions, though there are no studies comparing it to haemorrhoidal artery ligation. A recent overview has been carried out by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence which concludes that current evidence shows haemorrhoidal artery ligation to be a safe alternative to haemorrhoidectomy and haemorrhoidopexy though it also highlights the lack of good quality data as evidence for the advantages of the technique. METHODS/DESIGN:The aim of this study is to establish the clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of haemorrhoidal artery ligation compared with conventional rubber band ligation in the treatment of people with symptomatic second or third degree (Grade II or Grade III) haemorrhoids.Design: A multi-centre, parallel group randomised controlled trial.Outcomes: The primary outcome is patient-reported symptom recurrence twelve months following the intervention. Secondary outcome measures relate to symptoms, complications, health resource use, health related quality of life and cost effectiveness following the intervention.Participants: 350 patients with grade II or grade III haemorrhoids will be recruited in surgical departments in up to 14 NHS hospitals.Randomisation: A multi-centre, parallel group randomised controlled trial. Block randomisation by centre will be used, with 175 participants randomised to each group. DISCUSSION:The results of the research will help inform future practice for the treatment of grade II and III haemorrhoids.TRIAL REGISTRATION:ISRCTN4139471

Evaluation and prognostic significance of human tissue kallikrein-related peptidase 6 (KLK6) in colorectal cancer

The prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) is assessed through conventional clinicopathological parameters, which are not always accurate. Members of the human kallikrein-related peptidases gene family represent potential cancer biomarkers. The aim of this study was to investigate the expression of human tissue kallikrein-related peptidase 6 (KLK6) by immunohistochemistry in CRC to correlate this expression with various histopathological and clinical variables, and to evaluate its significance as a predictor of disease outcome. KLK6 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry and an expression score was calculated for each case. In CRC, KLK6 expression was decreased compared to normal colonic mucosa. A statistically significant, positive association was observed between KLK6 and tumor stage (p=0.036), lymph node metastases (p=0.030), and liver metastases (p=0.025). Univariate analysis showed that KLK6 expression and stage had statistically significant correlation with disease-free survival (p=0.045 and p&lt;0.001, respectively) and overall survival (p=0.027 and p&lt;0.001, respectively). Cox multivariate analysis showed that KLK6 expression was an independent predictor of unfavorable overall survival (p=0.041). Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that KLK6-positive patients have statistically significant lower disease-free and overall survival. In conclusion, KLK6 immunostaining is an independent prognostic marker in patients with CRC. © 2012 Elsevier GmbH

The Immunohistochemical Expression of Growth Hormone–Releasing Hormone Receptor Splice Variant 1 Is a Favorable Prognostic Marker in Colorectal Cancer

Hypothalamic growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone (GHRH) regulates the release of GH from the pituitary gland. The receptors for GHRH (GHRH-R) are expressed predominantly in the pituitary. Recent evidence demonstrates that splice variants of the GHRH receptor are also expressed in several nonpituitary tissues, both normal and tumoral, as well as in cancer cell lines. The aim of this study was to investigate the expression of the splice variant 1 (SV-1) of GHRH-R in colorectal cancer (CRC). Seventy patients who underwent partial colectomy for CRC were enrolled in the study. Immunohistochemical expression of SV-1 was studied in paraffin-embedded sections of patient tumor tissue. A cytoplasmic supranuclear expression of SV-1 was observed in CRC as well as in the normal colon mucosa. Tumor grade and pathological stage were negatively correlated with expression of SV-1 (P = 0.012 and P = 0.013, respectively). CRCs metastatic to the liver showed a lower expression of SV-1 than did primary tumors, but this difference was not statistically significant. Kaplan–Meier and Cox univariate survival analyses indicated an improved survival time in patients with high SV-1 compared with those with low GHRH-R expression, but this difference was not statistically significant. The immunohistochemical expression of SV-1 seems to be a favorable prognostic factor in CRC