17 research outputs found
A perspective on radical transformations to sustainability: resistances, movements and alternatives
A transformation to sustainability calls for radical and systemic societal shifts. Yet what this entails in practice and who the agents of this radical transformation are require further elaboration. This article recenters the role of environmental justice movements in transformations, arguing that the systemic, multi-dimensional and intersectional approach inherent in EJ activism is uniquely placed to contribute to the realization of equitable sustainable futures. Based on a perspective of conflict as productive, and a âconflict transformationâ approach that can address the root issues of ecological conflicts and promote the emergence of alternatives, we lay out a conceptual framework for understanding transformations through a power analysis that aims to confront and subvert hegemonic power relations; that is, multi-dimensional and intersectional; balancing ecological concerns with social, economic, cultural and democratic spheres; and is multi-scalar, and mindful of impacts across place and space. Such a framework can help analyze and recognize the contribution of grassroots EJ movements to societal transformations to sustainability and support and aid radical transformation processes. While transitions literature tends to focus on artifacts and technologies, we suggest that a resistance-centred perspective focuses on the creation of new subjectivities, power relations, values and institutions. This recenters the agency of those who are engaged in the creation and recuperation of ecological and new ways of being in the world in the needed transformation
The diffusion of alternative dispute resolution practices in Ireland
Recently, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) practices have gained increased exposure as a superior way of addressing workplace conflict. Several studies suggest that organizations in the USA have widely diffused some form of ADR. But uncertainty remains about whether this development is peculiar to the USA or whether it marks a more systemic shift in the way workplace conflict is addressed in organizations. The purpose of this article is to contribute to the debate about the importance of workplace ADR by examining the extent to which organizations based in Ireland have adopted ADR practices to address individual and group-based work problems. It also assesses the factors that influence the diffusion of ADR. The article finds that the diffusion of ADR practices has not been widespread in Ireland, with more innovation occurring in relation to ADR practices aimed at addressing group-based rather than individual-based workplace problems. US-ownership and high commitment HRM practices are found to be significant influences on the diffusion of ADR.</p
Social influence and the invocation of rights: The effects of accountability, reputation and political skill on legal claiming
Comparing the Israel-Palestinian Dispute to Australian Family Mediation
âFor decades the IsraelâPalestinian conflict has been characterized as
intractable, inextricable, and the root cause of suffering and misery for many of the
people who live in the Middle East regionâ. Whilst it would be unwise to expect
that the solution to this problem can be provided by negotiation support systems, we
believe such systems can provide useful advice and allow disputants to more adequately
understand their goals and support them to perform the trade-offs necessary
to arrive at acceptable solutions. Given our research on interested based negotiation
support systems to provide family mediation advice, we pose the question about the
ability of such systems to provide useful advice about the IsraelâPalestinian dispute.
We examine the differences between family mediation and international conflict resolution
and reflect upon whether results from the former can provide useful advice in
the latter. After identifying the issues in dispute and each of the disputantâs goals, the
data is fed into the Asset Divider system. The system allows users to engage in testing
the potential outcome of their dispute given their beliefs and goals. The system hence
outlines to users the consequences of insisting upon their stances. The outcome proposed
by the system given trial data, is similar to the successful Camp David accords
between Israel and Egypt, where Israel gave up territory for recognition and security