55 research outputs found
Assessment of patient-centered approaches to collect sexual orientation and gender identity information in the emergency department: The equality Study
Importance: Health care and government organizations call for routine collection of sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) information in the clinical setting, yet patient preferences for collection methods remain unknown.Objective: To assess of the optimal patient-centered approach for SOGI collection in the emergency department (ED) setting.Design, setting, and participants: This matched cohort study (Emergency Department Query for Patient-Centered Approaches to Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity [EQUALITY] Study) of 4 EDs on the east coast of the United States sequentially tested 2 different SOGI collection approaches between February 2016 and March 2017. Multivariable ordered logistic regression was used to assess whether either SOGI collection method was associated with higher patient satisfaction with their ED experience. Eligible adults older than 18 years who identified as a sexual or gender minority (SGM) were enrolled and then matched 1 to 1 by age (aged ≥5 years) and illness severity (Emergency Severity Index score ±1) to patients who identified as heterosexual and cisgender (non-SGM), and to patients whose SOGI information was missing (blank field). Patients who identified as SGM, non-SGM, or had a blank field were invited to complete surveys about their ED visit. Data analysis was conducted from April 2017 to November 2017.Interventions: Two SOGI collection approaches were tested: nurse verbal collection during the clinical encounter vs nonverbal collection during patient registration. The ED physicians, physician assistants, nurses, and registrars received education and training on sexual or gender minority health disparities and terminology prior to and throughout the intervention period.Main outcomes and measures: A detailed survey, developed with input of a stakeholder advisory board, which included a modified Communication Climate Assessment Toolkit score and additional patient satisfaction measures.Results: A total of 540 enrolled patients were analyzed; the mean age was 36.4 years and 66.5% of those who identified their gender were female. Sexual or gender minority patients had significantly better Communication Climate Assessment Toolkit scores with nonverbal registrar form collection compared with nurse verbal collection (mean [SD], 95.6 [11.9] vs 89.5 [20.5]; P = .03). No significant differences between the 2 approaches were found among non-SGM patients (mean [SD], 91.8 [18.9] vs 93.2 [13.6]; P = .59) or those with a blank field (92.7 [15.9] vs 93.6 [14.7]; P = .70). After adjusting for age, race, illness severity, and site, SGM patients had 2.57 (95% CI, 1.13-5.82) increased odds of a better Communication Climate Assessment Toolkit score category during form collection compared with verbal collection.Conclusions and relevance: Sexual or gender minority patients reported greater comfort and improved communication when SOGI was collected via nonverbal self-report. Registrar form collection was the optimal patient-centered method for collecting SOGI information in the ED
Timing and cost of scaling up surgical services in low-income and middle-income countries from 2012 to 2030 : a modelling study
Background: Given the large burden of surgical conditions and the crosscutting nature of surgery, scale-up of basic surgical services is crucial to health-system strengthening. The Lancet Commission on Global Surgery proposed that, to meet populations' needs, countries should achieve 5000 major operations per 100 000 population per year. We modelled the possible scale-up of surgical services in 88 low-income and middle-income countries with a population greater than 1 million from 2012 to 2030 at various rates and quantified the associated costs. Methods: Major surgery includes any intervention within an operating room involving tissue manipulation and anaesthesia. We used estimates for the number of major operations achieved per country annually and the number of operating rooms per region, and data from Mongolia and Mexico for trends in the number of operations. Unit costs included a cost per operation, proxied by caesarean section cost estimates; hospital construction data were used to estimate cost per operating room construction. We determined the year by which each country would achieve the Commission's target. We modelled three scenarios for the scale-up rate: actual rates (5·1% per year) and two "aspirational" rates, the rates achieved by Mongolia (8·9% annual) and Mexico (22·5% annual). We subsequently estimated the associated costs. Findings: About half of the 88 countries would achieve the target by 2030 at actual rates of improvements, with up to two-thirds if the rate were increased to Mongolian rates. We estimate the total costs of achieving scale-up at US$300-420 billion (95% UI 190-600 billion) over 2012-30, which represents 4-8% of total annual health expenditures among low-income and lower middle-income countries and 1% among upper middle-income countries. Interpretation: Scale-up of surgical services will not reach the target of 5000 operations per 100 000 by 2030 in about half of low-income and middle-income countries without increased funding, which countries and the international community must seek to achieve expansion of quality surgical services
Recommended from our members
Size and distribution of the global volume of surgery in 2012
Abstract Objective: To estimate global surgical volume in 2012 and compare it with estimates from 2004. Methods: For the 194 Member States of the World Health Organization, we searched PubMed for studies and contacted key informants for reports on surgical volumes between 2005 and 2012. We obtained data on population and total health expenditure per capita for 2012 and categorized Member States as very-low, low, middle and high expenditure. Data on caesarean delivery were obtained from validated statistical reports. For Member States without recorded surgical data, we estimated volumes by multiple imputation using data on total health expenditure. We estimated caesarean deliveries as a proportion of all surgery. Findings: We identified 66 Member States reporting surgical data. We estimated that 312.9 million operations (95% confidence interval, CI: 266.2–359.5) took place in 2012, an increase from the 2004 estimate of 226.4 million operations. Only 6.3% (95% CI: 1.7–22.9) and 23.1% (95% CI: 14.8–36.7) of operations took place in very-low- and low-expenditure Member States representing 36.8% (2573 million people) and 34.2% (2393 million people) of the global population of 7001 million people, respectively. Caesarean deliveries comprised 29.6% (5.8/19.6 million operations; 95% CI: 9.7–91.7) of the total surgical volume in very-low-expenditure Member States, but only 2.7% (5.1/187.0 million operations; 95% CI: 2.2–3.4) in high-expenditure Member States. Conclusion: Surgical volume is large and growing, with caesarean delivery comprising nearly a third of operations in most resource-poor settings. Nonetheless, there remains disparity in the provision of surgical services globally
Global access to surgical care: a modelling study
Background More than 2 billion people are unable to receive surgical care based on operating theatre density alone.
The vision of the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery is universal access to safe, aff ordable surgical and anaesthesia
care when needed. We aimed to estimate the number of individuals worldwide without access to surgical services as
defi ned by the Commission’s vision.
Methods We modelled access to surgical services in 196 countries with respect to four dimensions: timeliness,
surgical capacity, safety, and aff ordability. We built a chance tree for each country to model the probability of surgical
access with respect to each dimension, and from this we constructed a statistical model to estimate the proportion of
the population in each country that does not have access to surgical services. We accounted for uncertainty with oneway
sensitivity analyses, multiple imputation for missing data, and probabilistic sensitivity analysis.
Findings At least 4·8 billion people (95% posterior credible interval 4·6–5·0 [67%, 64–70]) of the world’s population
do not have access to surgery. The proportion of the population without access varied widely when stratifi ed by
epidemiological region: greater than 95% of the population in south Asia and central, eastern, and western sub-
Saharan Africa do not have access to care, whereas less than 5% of the population in Australasia, high-income North
America, and western Europe lack access.
Interpretation Most of the world’s population does not have access to surgical care, and access is inequitably
distributed. The near absence of access in many low-income and middle-income countries represents a crisis, and as
the global health community continues to support the advancement of universal health coverage, increasing access to
surgical services will play a central role in ensuring health care for all
The American College of Surgeons Needs-Based Assessment of Trauma Systems: Estimates for the State of California.
Undertriage remains a vexing problem for even the most highly developed trauma systems: The need for innovations in field triage
Validation of zip code-based estimates of ambulance driving distance to control for access to care in emergency surgery research
This study uses Medicaid data files to estimate the association of estimated driving distance and reported driven ambulance miles from an injury site to a hospital during emergency medical service calls as a means to assess data accuracy for use in future research
A national assessment of trauma systems using the American college of surgeons NBATS tool: Geographic distribution of trauma center need
Objective: To compare the Needs Based Assessment of Trauma Systems (NBATS) tool estimates of trauma center need to the existing trauma infrastructure using observed national trauma volume.Summary background data: Robust trauma systems have improved outcomes for severely injured patients. The NBATS tool was created by the American College of Surgeons (ACS) to align trauma resource allocation with regional needs.Methods: Data from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Healthcare Costs and Utilization Project State Inpatient Databases, the Trauma Information Exchange Program, and US Census was used to calculate an NBATS score for each trauma service area (TSA) as defined by the Pittsburgh Atlas. This score was used to estimate the number of trauma centers allocated to each TSA and compared to the number of existing trauma centers.Results: NBATS predicts the need for 117 additional trauma centers across the United States in order to provide adequate access to trauma care nationwide. At least one additional trauma center is needed in 49% of trauma service areas.Conclusions: Application of the NBATS tool nationally shows the need for additional trauma infrastructure across a large segment of the United States. We identified some limitations of the NBATS tool, including preferential weighting based on current infrastructure. The NBATS tool provides a good framework to begin the national discussion around investing in the expansion of trauma systems nationally, however in many instances lacks the granularity to drive change at the local level
- …