31 research outputs found
Corrigendum: Assessing the Driver's Current Level of Working Memory Load With High Density Functional Near-infrared Spectroscopy: A Realistic Driving Simulator Study
Recognizing Frustration of Drivers From Face Video Recordings and Brain Activation Measurements With Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
Experiencing frustration while driving can harm cognitive processing, result in aggressive behavior and hence negatively influence driving performance and traffic safety. Being able to automatically detect frustration would allow adaptive driver assistance and automation systems to adequately react to a driver’s frustration and mitigate potential negative consequences. To identify reliable and valid indicators of driver’s frustration, we conducted two driving simulator experiments. In the first experiment, we aimed to reveal facial expressions that indicate frustration in continuous video recordings of the driver’s face taken while driving highly realistic simulator scenarios in which frustrated or non-frustrated emotional states were experienced. An automated analysis of facial expressions combined with multivariate logistic regression classification revealed that frustrated time intervals can be discriminated from non-frustrated ones with accuracy of 62.0% (mean over 30 participants). A further analysis of the facial expressions revealed that frustrated drivers tend to activate muscles in the mouth region (chin raiser, lip pucker, lip pressor). In the second experiment, we measured cortical activation with almost whole-head functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) while participants experienced frustrating and non-frustrating driving simulator scenarios. Multivariate logistic regression applied to the fNIRS measurements allowed us to discriminate between frustrated and non-frustrated driving intervals with higher accuracy of 78.1% (mean over 12 participants). Frustrated driving intervals were indicated by increased activation in the inferior frontal, putative premotor and occipito-temporal cortices. Our results show that facial and cortical markers of frustration can be informative for time resolved driver state identification in complex realistic driving situations. The markers derived here can potentially be used as an input for future adaptive driver assistance and automation systems that detect driver frustration and adaptively react to mitigate it
Demonstrating Brain-Level Interactions Between Visuospatial Attentional Demands and Working Memory Load While Driving Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
Driving is a complex task concurrently drawing on multiple cognitive resources. Yet, there is a lack of studies investigating interactions at the brain-level among different driving subtasks in dual-tasking. This study investigates how visuospatial attentional demands related to increased driving difficulty interacts with different working memory load (WML) levels at the brain level. Using multichannel whole-head high density functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) brain activation measurements, we aimed to predict driving difficulty level, both separate for each WML level and with a combined model. Participants drove for approximately 60 min on a highway with concurrent traffic in a virtual reality driving simulator. In half of the time, the course led through a construction site with reduced lane width, increasing visuospatial attentional demands. Concurrently, participants performed a modified version of the n-back task with five different WML levels (from 0-back up to 4-back), forcing them to continuously update, memorize, and recall the sequence of the previous ‘n’ speed signs and adjust their speed accordingly. Using multivariate logistic ridge regression, we were able to correctly predict driving difficulty in 75.0% of the signal samples (1.955 Hz sampling rate) across 15 participants in an out-of-sample cross-validation of classifiers trained on fNIRS data separately for each WML level. There was a significant effect of the WML level on the driving difficulty prediction accuracies [range 62.2–87.1%; χ2(4) = 19.9, p < 0.001, Kruskal–Wallis H test] with highest prediction rates at intermediate WML levels. On the contrary, training one classifier on fNIRS data across all WML levels severely degraded prediction performance (mean accuracy of 46.8%). Activation changes in the bilateral dorsal frontal (putative BA46), bilateral inferior parietal (putative BA39), and left superior parietal (putative BA7) areas were most predictive to increased driving difficulty. These discriminative patterns diminished at higher WML levels indicating that visuospatial attentional demands and WML involve interacting underlying brain processes. The changing pattern of driving difficulty related brain areas across WML levels could indicate potential changes in the multitasking strategy with level of WML demand, in line with the multiple resource theory
Driver's turning intent recognition model based on brain activation and contextual information
Investigating Differences in Behavior and Brain in Human-Human and Human-Autonomous Vehicle Interactions in Time-Critical Situations
A REFERENCE ARCHITECTURE OF HUMAN CYBER-PHYSICAL SYSTEMS – PART III: SEMANTIC FOUNDATIONS
he design and analysis of multi-agent human cyber-physical systems in safety-critical or industry-critical domains calls for an adequate semantic foundation capable of exhaustively and rigorously describing all emergent effects in the joint dynamic behavior of the agents that are relevant to their safety and well-behavior. We present such a semantic foundation. This framework extends beyond previous approaches by extending the agent-local dynamic state beyond state components under direct control of the agent and belief about other agents (as previously suggested for understanding cooperative as well as rational behavior) to agent-local evidence and belief about the overall cooperative, competitive, or coopetitive game structure. We argue that this extension is necessary for rigorously analyzing systems of human cyber-physical systems because humans are known to employ cognitive replacement models of system dynamics that are both non-stationary and potentially incongruent. These replacement models induce visible and potentially harmful effects on their joint emergent behavior and the interaction with cyber-physical system components
A REFERENCES ARCHITECTURE FOR HUMAN CYBER PHYSICAL SYSTEMS - PART II: FUNDAMENTAL DESIGN PRINCIPLES FOR HUMAN-CPS INTERACTION
As automation increases qualitatively and quantitatively in safety-critical human cyber-physical systems, it is becoming more and more challenging
to increase the probability or ensure that human operators still perceive key artefacts and comprehend their roles in the system. In the companion
paper, we proposed an abstract reference architecture capable of expressing all classes of system-level interactions in human cyber-physical
systems. Here we demonstrate how this reference architecture supports the analysis of levels of communication between agents and helps to
identify the potential for misunderstandings and misconceptions. We then develop a metamodel for safe human machine interaction. Therefore,
we ask what type of information exchange must be supported on what level so that humans and systems can cooperate as a team, what is the
criticality of exchanged information, what are timing requirements for such interactions, and how can we communicate highly critical information
in a limited time frame in spite of the many sources of a distorted perception. We highlight shared stumbling blocks and illustrate shared design
principles, which rest on established ontologies specific to particular application classes. In order to overcome the partial opacity of internal states
of agents, we anticipate a key role of virtual twins of both human and technical cooperation partners for designing a suitable communicati
A REFERENCE ARCHITECTURE OF HUMAN CYBER PHYSICAL SYSTEMS PART I: CONCEPTUAL STRUCTURE
We propose a reference architecture of safety-critical or industry-critical human cyber-physical systems (CPSs) capable of expressing essential
classes of system-level interactions between CPS and humans relevant for the societal acceptance of such systems. To reach this quality gate, the
expressivity of the model must go beyond classical viewpoints such as operational, functional, architectural views and views used for safety and
security analysis. The model does so by incorporating elements of such systems for mutual introspections in situational awareness, capabilities,
and intentions in order to enable a synergetic, trusted relation in the interaction of humans and CPSs, which we see as a prerequisite for their
societal acceptance. The reference architecture is represented as a metamodel incorporating conceptual and behavioral semantic aspects. We
illustrate the key concepts of the metamodel with examples from smart grids, cooperative autonomous driving, and crisis manage
Fig7.tif
Correlation map obtained by regressing HbR for each fNIRS
channel over n-back working memory load level for participant 3 on a standard
brain template