Hidemitsu Toyota, vs. United States of America : on certificate from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.

https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/eastbooks/1069/thumbnail.jp

United States v. New Mexico

Slip Opinio

United States v. Mississippi (p. 710-1275)

Factual basis for allegation that since 1890 Mississippi has maintained and promoted white political supremacy and a racially segregated society; sections are divided both by the methods and by county and focus exclusively on voting; includes experiences of African Americans who tried to vote in Mississippi prior to 1955 followed by specific instances between 1955 and 1963 when African Americans were denied voting privileges because they did not interpret the Constitution to the satisfaction of the registrar; includes examples of voting applications by white registrants with unreasonable interpretations of the state constitution

United States v. Mississippi (p. 597-606)

The factual basis for the complaint that the proposed amendment to section 244 of the 1890 Mississippi Constitution was designed to perpetuate white political supremacy

California v. United States

Slip Opinio

United States v. Mississippi (p. 607-614)

The factual basis for the assertion that the 1960 amendment to the 1890 Mississippi Constitution (any person registering to vote after the effective date of the law should be of good moral character) was designed to prevent African Americans from voting while exempting white citizens from the requirement

United States v. Mississippi (p. 623-709)

Factual basis and sources for assertion that public education facilities for African Americans were and are inferior to those provided for whites

United States v. New Mexico

Slip Opinio

United States v. Mississippi (p. 557-563)

A list of delegates\u27 names at the 1890 Mississippi constitutional convention who sought to restrict African American franchise and perpetuate white supremacy