21 research outputs found
Changes in dietary habits and physical activity and status of metabolic syndrome among expatriates in Saudi Arabia
Acute heart failure with and without acute coronary syndrome: clinical correlates and prognostic impact (From the HEARTS registry)
Circadian Rhythm and ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the Third Gulf Registry of Acute Coronary Events (Gulf RACE-3Ps)
Impact of diabetes on hospital adverse cardiovascular outcomes in acute coronary syndrome patients: Data from the Saudi project of acute coronary events
Clinical features, socioeconomic status, management, short and long-term outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction: Phase I results of PEACE MENA registry.
BackgroundThe Program for the Evaluation and Management of Cardiac Events in the Middle East and North Africa (PEACE MENA) is a prospective registry program in Arabian countries that involves in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or acute heart failure (AHF).MethodsThis prospective, multi-center, multi-country study is the first report of the baseline characteristics and outcomes of inpatients with AMI who were enrolled during the first 14-month recruitment phase. We report the clinical characteristics, socioeconomic, educational levels, and management, in-hospital, one month and one-year outcomes.ResultsBetween April 2019 and June 2020, 1377 patients with AMI were enrolled (79.1% males) from 16 Arabian countries. The mean age (± SD) was 58 ± 12 years. Almost half of the population had a net income ConclusionIn the MENA region, patients with AMI present at a young age and have a high burden of cardiac risk factors. Most of the patients in the registry have a low income and low educational status. There is heterogeneity among key performance indicators of AMI management among various Arabian countries
Median time-line of events from symptoms-onset to the administration of reperfusion therapies (total ischemic time) in acute STEMI patients that arrived to the hospital by an emergency medical service (EMS) versus not (non-EMS).
<p>SO, symptoms-onset, FMC, first medical contact; ED, Emergency Department arrival, ECG, electrocardiogram; TT/PPCI, thrombolytic therapy/primary percutaneous coronary intervention.</p
Number of hospitals with percutaneous coronary intervention capability (PCI H.) versus without (Non-PCI H.) that enrolled acute STEMI patients in the study per each Arabian Gulf country.
<p>Number of hospitals with percutaneous coronary intervention capability (PCI H.) versus without (Non-PCI H.) that enrolled acute STEMI patients in the study per each Arabian Gulf country.</p
Evidence-based treatments administered in the first 24 hours of hospital admission in acute STEMI patients that arrived to the hospital by an emergency medical service (EMS) versus not (non-EMS).
<p>Other aniplatelets, clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor; BB, beta-blockers; ACE-I/ARB, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/Angiotensin-receptor blockers, Heparins, unfractionated or low-molecular weight heparin; GP 2b/3a-I, glycoprotein 2bb/3a inhibitors.</p
The first survey of the Saudi Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry Program: Main results and long-term outcomes (STARS-1 Program).
BACKGROUND:Prior acute coronary syndrome (ACS) registries in Saudi Arabia might not have accurately described the true demographics and cardiac care of patients with ACS. We aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of a representative sample of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in Saudi Arabia. METHODS:We conducted a 1-month snap-shot, prospective, multi-center registry study in 50 hospitals from various health care sectors in Saudi Arabia. We followed patients for 1 month and 1 year after hospital discharge. Patients with AMI included those with or without ST-segment elevation (STEMI or NSTEMI, respectively). This program survey will be repeated every 5 years. RESULTS:Between May 2015 and January 2017, we enrolled 2233 patients with ACS (mean age was 56 [standard deviation = 13] years; 55.6% were Saudi citizens, 85.7% were men, and 65.9% had STEMI). Coronary artery disease risk factors were high; 52.7% had diabetes mellitus and 51.2% had hypertension. Emergency Medical Services (EMS) was utilized in only 5.2% of cases. Revascularization for patients with STEMI included thrombolytic therapy (29%), primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); (42.5%), neither (29%), or a pharmaco-invasive approach (3%). Non-Saudis with STEMI were less likely to undergo primary PCI compared to Saudis (35.8% vs. 48.7%; respectively, p <0.001), and women were less likely than men to achieve a door-to-balloon time of <90 min (42% vs. 65%; respectively, p = 0.003). Around half of the patients with NSTEMI did not undergo a coronary angiogram. All-cause mortality rates were 4%, 5.8%, and 8.1%, in-hospital, at 1 month, and at 1 year, respectively. These rates were significantly higher in women than in men. CONCLUSIONS:There is an urgent need for primary prevention programs, improving the EMS infrastructure and utilization, and establishing organized ACS network programs. AMI care needs further improvement, particularly for women and non-Saudis