Metabolism of Vesnarinone by Activated Neutrophils: Implications for Vesnarinone-Ind uced Agranulocytosis1

ABSTRACT Vesnarinon

The skin as a metabolic and immune-competent organ: implications fordrug-induced skin rash.

Current advances in the study of cutaneous adverse drug reactions can be attributed to the recent understanding that the skin is both a metabolically and immunologically competent organ. The ability of the skin to serve as a protective barrier with limited drug biotransformation ability, yet highly active immune function, has provided insights into its biological capability. While the immune response of the skin to drugs is vastly different from that of the liver due to evolutionary conditioning, it frequently occurs in response to various drug classes and manifests as a spectrum of hypersensitivity reactions. The skin is a common site of adverse and idiosyncratic drug reactions; drug-specific T-cells, as well as involvement of an innate immune response, appear to be key mechanistic drivers in such scenarios. Association of other factors such as human leukocyte antigen (HLA) polymorphisms may play a significant role for particular drugs. This review aims to integrate emerging findings into proposed mechanisms of drug metabolism and immunity in the skin that are likely responsible for rashes and other local allergic responses. These unique biological aspects of the skin, and their translation into implications for drug development and the use of animal models, will be discussed

Involvement of CCL2/CCR2 macrophage recruitment in amodiaquine-induced liver injury

Evidence suggests that macrophages may play a role in the development of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (IDILI). However, there has yet to be a clear link between macrophage activation and the inflammatory infiltrate that is characteristic of IDILI. A major chemokine involved in the recruitment of macrophages into the liver is C-C motif chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2)/monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP1). Therefore, we tested the effect of this chemokine in an animal model of IDILI. Specifically, amodiaquine (AQ), which is known to cause IDILI in humans, causes mild liver injury in wild-type C57BL/6 mice that resolves despite continued AQ treatment, but it causes more severe liver injury that does not resolve in PD-1−/− mice co-treated with anti-CTLA-4 to impair immune tolerance. CCR2−/− mice treated with AQ were not protected from the expected AQ-induced liver injury seen in wild-type C57BL/6 mice. In contrast, anti-CCL2 antibodies attenuated the liver injury caused by AQ in the impaired immune tolerance model. The difference in response of the two models is likely due to a difference in the IDILI mechanism; the mild injury in wild-type animals is mediated by NK cells, while the more serious injury in the impaired immune tolerance model requires CD8 T-cells. The results from these experiments provide evidence that macrophage infiltration into the liver may not be involved in mild IDILI mediated by the innate immune system, but it does appear necessary in more severe IDILI involving cytotoxic T-cells

Use of an animal model to test whether non-alcoholic fatty liver disease increases the risk of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury

Clinical evidence suggests that most idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (IDILI) is immune-mediated. The danger hypothesis suggests that liver injury and inflammation would increase the risk of an immune response leading to IDILI. Therefore, a reasonable hypothesis would be that an underlying chronic liver disease such as non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) would increase the risk of developing IDILI due to inflammation and release of danger signals from damaged cells. In order to test this hypothesis, mice were fed a methionine-/choline-deficient (MCD) diet that produces a consistent NASH phenotype, along with amodiaquine (AQ) – a drug known to cause IDILI in humans. This study employed both wild-type C57BL/6 mice and PD-1−/− mice co-treated with anti-CTLA-4 antibodies. The PD-1−/− + anti-CTLA-4 model produces an immune-mediated liver injury very similar to the idiosyncratic liver injury observed in humans. The liver injury observed in the present experiment was dominated by the injury caused by the MCD diet; there was no significant difference between mice treated with the MCD diet alone and those also treated with AQ, whether in wild-type mice of the PD-1−/− model. Therefore, the MCD diet, which results in a state that mimics NASH, did not appear to increase the liver injury associated with AQ treatment. Ultimately, an animal model is just that – only a model, and cannot provide a definitive answer to clinical questions. However, given the difficulty of performing clinical studies with appropriate control populations, the present results provide important evidence to support a general clinical finding that underlying liver injury does not usually increase the risk of IDILI