6 research outputs found

    First Observation of the decay KL -> pi0 e e gamma

    Full text link
    We report on the first observation of the decay KL -> pi0 ee gamma by the KTeV E799 experiment at Fermilab. Based upon a sample of 48 events with an estimated background of 3.6 +/- 1.1 events, we measure the KL -> pi0 ee gamma branching ratio to be (2.34 +/- 0.35 +/- 0.13)x10^{-8}. Our data agree with recent O(p^6) calculations in chiral perturbation theory that include contributions from vector meson exchange through the parameter a_V. A fit was made to the KL -> pi0 ee gamma data for a_V with the result -0.67 +/- 0.21 +/- 0.12, which is consistent with previous results from KTeV.Comment: Submitted to Physical Review Letters, 5 pages, 5 figure

    On the Relationship Between Energy Complexity and Other Boolean Function Measures

    No full text
    In this work we investigate into energy complexity, a Boolean function measure related to circuit complexity. Given a circuit C\mathcal{C} over the standard basis {2,2,¬}\{\vee_2,\wedge_2,\neg\}, the energy complexity of C\mathcal{C}, denoted by EC(C)\mathrm{EC}(\mathcal{C}), is the maximum number of its activated inner gates over all inputs. The energy complexity of a Boolean function ff, denoted by EC(f)\mathrm{EC}(f), is the minimum of EC(C)\mathrm{EC}(\mathcal{C}) over all circuits C\mathcal{C} computing ff. This concept has attracted lots of attention in literature. Recently, Dinesh, Otiv, and Sarma [COCOON'18] gave EC(f)\mathrm{EC}(f) an upper bound in terms of the decision tree complexity, EC(f)=O(D(f)3)\mathrm{EC}(f)=O(\mathrm{D}(f)^3). They also showed that EC(f)3n1\mathrm{EC}(f)\leq 3n-1, where nn is the input size. Recall that the minimum size of circuit to compute ff could be as large as 2n/n2^n/n. We improve their upper bounds by showing that EC(f)min{12D(f)2+O(D(f)),n+2D(f)2}\mathrm{EC}(f)\leq\min\{\frac12\mathrm{D}(f)^2+O(\mathrm{D}(f)),n+2\mathrm{D}(f)-2\}. For the lower bound, Dinesh, Otiv, and Sarma defined positive sensitivity, a complexity measure denoted by psens(f)\mathrm{psens}(f), and showed that EC(f)13psens(f)\mathrm{EC}(f)\ge\frac{1}{3}\mathrm{psens}(f). They asked whether EC(f)\mathrm{EC}(f) can also be lower bounded by a polynomial of D(f)\mathrm{D}(f). In this paper we affirm it by proving EC(f)=Ω(D(f))\mathrm{EC}(f)=\Omega(\sqrt{\mathrm{D}(f)}). For non-degenerated functions with input size nn, we give another lower bound EC(f)=Ω(logn)\mathrm{EC}(f)=\Omega(\log{n}). All these three lower bounds are incomparable to each other. Besides, we also examine the energy complexity of OR\mathtt{OR} functions and ADDRESS\mathtt{ADDRESS} functions, which implies the tightness of our two lower bounds respectively. In addition, the former one answers another open question asking for a non-trivial lower bounds for the energy complexity of OR\mathtt{OR} functions.Comment: 15 pages, 6 figure

    On the computational power and complexity of spiking neural networks

    No full text
    Item does not contain fulltextThe last decade has seen the rise of neuromorphic architectures based on artificial spiking neural networks, such as the SpiNNaker, TrueNorth, and Loihi systems. The massive parallelism and co-locating of computation and memory in these architectures potentially allows for an energy usage that is orders of magnitude lower compared to traditional Von Neumann architectures. However, to date a comparison with more traditional computational architectures (particularly with respect to energy usage) is hampered by the lack of a formal machine model and a computational complexity theory for neuromorphic computation. In this paper we take the first steps towards such a theory. We introduce spiking neural networks as a machine model where - in contrast to the familiar Turing machine - information and the manipulation thereof are co-located in the machine. We introduce canonical problems, define hierarchies of complexity classes and provide some first completeness results.NICE '20: Neuro-inspired Computational Elements Workshop (Heidelberg, Germany, March, 2020
    corecore