Preference for CD4-guided versus continuous HARRT in Thailand

Nineteen patients who completed a 27-month CD4-guided structured treatment interruption (STI) trial that showed similar efficacy in STI and continuous arms were asked to choose CD4-guided versus continuous HAART after the study ended. Six chose STI and 13 chose continuous HAART. Reasons for not choosing STIs were fear of developing HIV-related illnesses (38%), fear of CD4 drop (30.8%), fear of viral load increase (7.7%) and ease (7.7%). Those who preferred CD4-guided HAART had a higher median CD4 count nadir during STI and fewer on-off cycles. This study provides an important insight into the preference of patients towards STI in a resource-limited setting

Pharmacokinetics and 24-week efficacy/safety of dual boosted saquinavir/lopinavir/ritonavir in nucleoside-pretreated children.

Contains fulltext : 49117.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)OBJECTIVE: To assess the pharmacokinetics and 24-week efficacy and safety of dual boosted saquinavir/lopinavir/ritonavir combination in children. DESIGN: Twenty reverse transcription inhibitor-pretreated children at 2 centers in Thailand were treated with saquinavir/lopinavir/ritonavir in an open label, single arm, 6-month prospective study. The dosage was 50 mg/kg twice daily (bid) for saquinavir and 230/57.5 mg/m bid for lopinavir/ritonavir. Ten children also received lamivudine. METHODS: Samples were collected for a 12-hour pharmacokinetic profile in all children. Plasma concentrations of saquinavir, lopinavir and ritonavir were determined using a validated high performance liquid chromatography technique. RESULTS: At baseline, the median age was 8.5 years, with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) RNA 4.9 log10 copies/mL, CD4 count 129 cells/microL and CD4%, 6.5%. Median area under the concentration curve at 0-12 hours and Cmin were 39.4 mg/L.h and 1.4 mg/L for saquinavir and 118 mg/L.hr and 5.9 mg/L for lopinavir. After 24 weeks of treatment, HIV RNA was suppressed below 400 copies/mL for 16 of 20 (80%) children (intent-to-treat analysis) and below 50 copies/mL for 12 of 20 children (60%), and CD4% (count) rose by a median of 6% (216 cells/microL). Median changes of triglyceride and total cholesterol were 56 and 36.5 mg/dL, respectively (P = 0.01). Lopinavir Cmin 400 copies/mL, and lopinavir Cmax >15 mg/L correlated with rises in cholesterol (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Plasma drug concentrations of saquinavir, lopinavir and ritonavir were at the higher limits of expected ranges for adult treatment at approved dosages (1000/100 mg bid for saquinavir, 400/100 mg bid for lopinavir/ritonavir). The regimen was well-tolerated and had good efficacy at 24 weeks. This dual boosted protease inhibitor combination should be assessed in larger trials of reverse transcription inhibitor-experienced children

The use of pharmacokinetically guided indinavir dose reductions in the management of indinavir-associated renal toxicity.

Contains fulltext : 50197.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)OBJECTIVES: Indinavir is associated with nephrotoxicity. Therapeutic drug monitoring of indinavir improves clinical outcome, but there is little data regarding therapeutic drug monitoring for patients with established indinavir-associated renal impairment. We prospectively studied the use of therapeutic drug monitoring in patients with virological success but established nephrotoxicity on an indinavir-containing regimen. METHODS: We measured indinavir C(trough)/C(2h), serum creatinine, pyuria, blood pressure (BP), weight and HIV RNA. The major endpoint of interest was the number of patients achieving a normal creatinine level 20 weeks following final indinavir dose adjustment. Primary analysis was by intention to treat (ITT). RESULTS: A total of 35 patients were enrolled; mean (SD) age 40.3 (5.8) years; mean (SD) BMI 21.5 (2.8) kg/m(2). At baseline 6/35 (17%) had a serum creatinine concentration within normal limits, but were offered enrolment because of previous nephrotoxicity (nephrolithiasis and/or abnormal serum creatinine), and a screening pharmacokinetic profile associated with increased nephrotoxicity risk. By ITT analysis 11/35 (31%) had normal creatinine at study end (P = 0.18). Of the 29 patients with abnormal creatinine at baseline, 7/29 (24.1%) had normal creatinine at study end (P = 0.016). Patients had a median (IQR) indinavir per dose adjustment over the study of 400 (400-800) mg. We observed improvements in estimated creatinine clearance, pyuria, resting BP and indinavir pharmacokinetic profile. HIV RNA control was maintained with continued immune recovery despite lower indinavir doses. CONCLUSIONS: Patients experiencing nephrotoxicity on an indinavir-containing regimen were safely maintained on indinavir by means of therapeutic drug monitoring. Parameters of renal function improved but did not return to baseline values, at least in the short-term

Development of HIV with drug resistance after CD4 cell count-guided structured treatment interruptions in patients treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy after dual-nucleoside analogue treatment.

For patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, structured treatment interruption (STI) is an attractive alternative strategy to continuous treatment, particularly in resource-restrained settings, because it reduces both side effects and costs. One major concern, however, is the development of resistance to antiretroviral drugs that can occur during multiple cycles of starting and stopping therapy. HIV genotypic drug resistance was investigated in 20 HIV-infected Thai patients treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and CD4 cell count-guided STI after dual nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) treatment. Resistance was tested at the time of the switch from dual-NRTI treatment to HAART and when HAART was stopped during the last interruption. After STI, one major drug-resistance mutation occurred (T215Y), and, in the 4 samples with preexisting major mutations (D67N [n=2], K70R [n=2], T215Y [n=2], and T215I [n=1]), the mutations disappeared. All mutations in the HIV protease gene were minor mutations already present, in most cases, before STI was started, and their frequency was not increased through STI, whereas the frequency of reverse-transcriptase gene mutations significantly decreased after the interruptions. After the 48-week study period, no patients had virological failure. Long-term follow-up (108 weeks) showed 1 case of virological failure in the STI arm and 1 in the continuous arm. No virological failure was seen in patients with major mutations. Major HIV drug-resistance mutations were not induced through CD4 cell count-guided treatment interruptions in HIV-infected patients successfully treated with HAART after dual-NRTI therap

Three-year durability of dual-nucleoside versus triple-nucleoside therapy in a Thai population with HIV infection

We compared the long-term immunologic and virologic efficacy of the dual- and triple-nucleoside therapy for HIV infection. This was a retrospective analysis of 2 randomized clinical trials in antiretroviral-naive patients. In the dual-nucleoside group, 15 started with didanosine (ddI) monotherapy and then added stavudine (d4T) after 24 weeks, 63 started with various doses of d4T and ddI, and 53 started with zidovudine (ZDV) and lamivudine (3TC). In the triple-nucleoside group, 53 started with ZDV, 3TC, and ddI. After 48 weeks, patients who were not failing were randomized to immediate (before treatment failure) versus delayed (at the time of virologic failure) switching from ddI and d4T to ZDV and 3TC or vice versa and from ZDV, 3TC, and ddI to d4T, 3TC, and abacavir (ABC). Failure was defined as a plasma HIV-1 RNA level greater than or equal to1 log(10) above nadir or greater than or equal to10,000 copies/mL when nadir was <500 copies/mL. Patients failing therapy before week 48 received the new treatment as in the immediate switching group. Hydroxyurea was added to the last treatment regimen if patients failed after week 96. CD4 count and plasma HIV-1 RNA level (branched DNA assay with a cutoff point of 50 copies/mL) at week 144 were analyzed by intention to treat. Compared with the dual-nucleoside group, the triple-nucleoside group had a higher proportion of patients with <50 copies/mL at 144 weeks (60% vs. 18%; P <0.001), higher median CD4 count (388 cells/muL vs. 346 cells/muL; P = 0.018), and longer duration of response, defined as the time from onset of viral suppression ( <500 copies/mL) to the time of treatment failure (the first of 2 consecutive HIV-1 RNA measurements >500 copies/mL never followed by 2 consecutive visits showing suppressible viremia to <500 copies/mL) or discontinuation from the study (144 weeks vs. 104 weeks; P = 0.002). Multivariate regression analyses showed that significant predictors for treatment success, defined as a plasma viral load <50 copies/mL at week 144, were asymptomatic clinical status at enrollment, a baseline plasma viral load less than or equal to30,000 copies/mL, treatment with triple nucleosides, and a viral load response of <500 copies/mL by week 12. Triple-nucleoside therapy with ZDV, 3TC, and ddI or d4T, 3TC, and ABC in patients with HIV infection is more effective in inducing a sustained virologic response than the dual combinations of ZDV and 3TC or ddI and d4