Sputum macrophage diversity and activation in asthma: role of severity and inflammatory phenotype

BACKGROUND:Macrophages control innate and acquired immunity, but their role in severe asthma remains ill-defined. We investigated gene signatures of macrophage subtypes in the sputum of 104 asthmatics and 16 healthy volunteers from the U-BIOPRED cohort. METHODS:Forty-nine gene signatures (modules) for differentially stimulated macrophages, one to assess lung tissue-resident cells (TR-Mφ) and two for their polarization (classically and alternatively activated macrophages: M1 and M2, respectively) were studied using gene set variation analysis. We calculated enrichment scores (ES) across severity and previously identified asthma transcriptome-associated clusters (TACs). RESULTS:Macrophage numbers were significantly decreased in severe asthma compared to mild-moderate asthma and healthy volunteers. The ES for most modules were also significantly reduced in severe asthma except for 3 associated with inflammatory responses driven by TNF and Toll-like receptors via NF-κB, eicosanoid biosynthesis via the lipoxygenase pathway and IL-2 biosynthesis (all P < .01). Sputum macrophage number and the ES for most macrophage signatures were higher in the TAC3 group compared to TAC1 and TAC2 asthmatics. However, a high enrichment was found in TAC1 for 3 modules showing inflammatory pathways linked to Toll-like and TNF receptor activation and arachidonic acid metabolism (P < .001) and in TAC2 for the inflammasome and interferon signalling pathways (P < .001). Data were validated in the ADEPT cohort. Module analysis provides additional information compared to conventional M1 and M2 classification. TR-Mφ were enriched in TAC3 and associated with mitochondrial function. CONCLUSIONS:Macrophage activation is attenuated in severe granulocytic asthma highlighting defective innate immunity except for specific subsets characterized by distinct inflammatory pathways

A transcriptome-driven analysis of epithelial brushings and bronchial biopsies to define asthma phenotypes in U-BIOPRED

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Asthma is a heterogeneous disease driven by diverse immunologic and inflammatory mechanisms. We used transcriptomic profiling of airway tissues to help define asthma phenotypes. METHODS: The transcriptome from bronchial biopsies and epithelial brushings of 107 moderate-to-severe asthmatics were annotated by gene-set variation analysis (GSVA) using 42 gene-signatures relevant to asthma, inflammation and immune function. Topological data analysis (TDA) of clinical and histological data was used to derive clusters and the nearest shrunken centroid algorithm used for signature refinement. RESULTS: 9 GSVA signatures expressed in bronchial biopsies and airway epithelial brushings distinguished two distinct asthma subtypes associated with high expression of T-helper type 2 (Th-2) cytokines and lack of corticosteroid response (Group 1 and Group 3). Group 1 had the highest submucosal eosinophils, high exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) levels, exacerbation rates and oral corticosteroid (OCS) use whilst Group 3 patients showed the highest levels of sputum eosinophils and had a high BMI. In contrast, Group 2 and Group 4 patients had an 86% and 64% probability of having non-eosinophilic inflammation. Using machine-learning tools, we describe an inference scheme using the currently-available inflammatory biomarkers sputum eosinophilia and exhaled nitric oxide levels along with OCS use that could predict the subtypes of gene expression within bronchial biopsies and epithelial cells with good sensitivity and specificity. CONCLUSION: This analysis demonstrates the usefulness of a transcriptomic-driven approach to phenotyping that segments patients who may benefit the most from specific agents that target Th2-mediated inflammation and/or corticosteroid insensitivity

Association of differential mast cell activation with granulocytic inflammation in severe asthma

BACKGROUND: Mast cells (MC) play a role in inflammation and both innate and adaptive immunity but their involvement in severe asthma (SA) remains undefined. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the phenotypic characteristics of the U-BIOPRED asthma cohort by applying published MC activation signatures to the sputum cell transcriptome. METHODS: 84 SA, 20 mild/moderate (MMA) asthma, and 16 non-asthmatic healthy participants were studied. We calculated enrichment scores (ES) for nine MC activation signatures by asthma severity, sputum granulocyte status and three previously-defined sputum molecular phenotypes or transcriptome-associated clusters (TAC1, 2, 3) using gene-set variation analysis. RESULTS: MC signatures except unstimulated, repeated FcεR1-stimulated and IFNγ-stimulated were enriched in SA. A FcεR1-IgE-stimulated and a single cell signature from asthmatic bronchial biopsies were highly enriched in eosinophilic asthma and in the TAC1 molecular phenotype. Subjects with a high ES for these signatures had elevated sputum levels of similar genes and pathways. IL-33- and LPS-stimulated MC signatures had greater ES in neutrophilic and mixed granulocytic asthma and in the TAC2 molecular phenotype. These subjects exhibited neutrophil, NF-κB, and IL-1β/TNFα pathway activation. The IFNγ-stimulated signature had the greatest ES in TAC2 and TAC3 that was associated with responses to viral infection. Similar results were obtained in an independent ADEPT asthma cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Gene signatures of MC activation allow the detection of SA phenotypes and indicate that MC can be induced to take on distinct transcriptional phenotypes associated with specific clinical phenotypes. IL-33-stimulated MCs signature was associated with severe neutrophilic asthma while IgE-activated MC with an eosinophilic phenotype

Sputum transcriptomics reveal upregulation of IL-1 receptor family members in patients with severe asthma

BACKGROUND: Sputum analysis in asthmatic patients is used to define airway inflammatory processes and might guide therapy. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine differential gene and protein expression in sputum samples from patients with severe asthma (SA) compared with nonsmoking patients with mild/moderate asthma. METHODS: Induced sputum was obtained from nonsmoking patients with SA, smokers/ex-smokers with severe asthma, nonsmoking patients with mild/moderate asthma (MMAs), and healthy nonsmoking control subjects. Differential cell counts, microarray analysis of cell pellets, and SOMAscan analysis of sputum analytes were performed. CRID3 was used to inhibit the inflammasome in a mouse model of SA. RESULTS: Eosinophilic and mixed neutrophilic/eosinophilic inflammation were more prevalent in patients with SA compared with MMAs. Forty-two genes probes were upregulated (>2-fold) in nonsmoking patients with severe asthma compared with MMAs, including IL-1 receptor (IL-1R) family and nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain, leucine-rich repeat and pyrin domain containing 3 (NRLP3) inflammasome members (false discovery rate < 0.05). The inflammasome proteins nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain, leucine rich repeat and pyrin domain containing 1 (NLRP1), NLRP3, and nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptor C4 (NLRC4) were associated with neutrophilic asthma and with sputum IL-1β protein levels, whereas eosinophilic asthma was associated with an IL-13-induced TH2 signature and IL-1 receptor-like 1 (IL1RL1) mRNA expression. These differences were sputum specific because no activation of NLRP3 or enrichment of IL-1R family genes in bronchial brushings or biopsy specimens in patients with SA was observed. Expression of NLRP3 and of the IL-1R family genes was validated in the Airway Disease Endotyping for Personalized Therapeutics cohort. Inflammasome inhibition using CRID3 prevented airway hyperresponsiveness and airway inflammation (both neutrophilia and eosinophilia) in a mouse model of severe allergic asthma. CONCLUSION: IL1RL1 gene expression is associated with eosinophilic SA, whereas NLRP3 inflammasome expression is highest in patients with neutrophilic SA. TH2-driven eosinophilic inflammation and neutrophil-associated inflammasome activation might represent interacting pathways in patients with SA

Sputum transcriptomics reveal upregulation of IL-1 receptor family members in patients with severe asthma

Background: Sputum analysis in asthmatic patients is used to define airway inflammatory processes and might guide therapy. Objective: We sought to determine differential gene and protein expression in sputum samples from patients with severe asthma (SA) compared with nonsmoking patients with mild/moderate asthma. Methods: Induced sputum was obtained from nonsmoking patients with SA, smokers/ex-smokers with severe asthma, nonsmoking patients with mild/moderate asthma (MMAs), and healthy nonsmoking control subjects. Differential cell counts, microarray analysis of cell pellets, and SOMAscan analysis of sputum analytes were performed. CRID3 was used to inhibit the inflammasome in a mouse model of SA. Results: Eosinophilic and mixed neutrophilic/eosinophilic inflammation were more prevalent in patients with SA compared with MMAs. Forty-two genes probes were upregulated (&gt;2-fold) in nonsmoking patients with severe asthma compared with MMAs, including IL-1 receptor (IL-1R) family and nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain, leucine-rich repeat and pyrin domain containing 3 (NRLP3) inflammasome members (false discovery rate &lt; 0.05). The inflammasome proteins nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain, leucine rich repeat and pyrin domain containing 1 (NLRP1), NLRP3, and nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptor C4 (NLRC4) were associated with neutrophilic asthma and with sputum IL-1β protein levels, whereas eosinophilic asthma was associated with an IL-13–induced TH2 signature and IL-1 receptor–like 1 (IL1RL1) mRNA expression. These differences were sputum specific because no activation of NLRP3 or enrichment of IL-1R family genes in bronchial brushings or biopsy specimens in patients with SA was observed. Expression of NLRP3 and of the IL-1R family genes was validated in the Airway Disease Endotyping for Personalized Therapeutics cohort. Inflammasome inhibition using CRID3 prevented airway hyperresponsiveness and airway inflammation (both neutrophilia and eosinophilia) in a mouse model of severe allergic asthma. Conclusion: IL1RL1 gene expression is associated with eosinophilic SA, whereas NLRP3 inflammasome expression is highest in patients with neutrophilic SA. TH2-driven eosinophilic inflammation and neutrophil-associated inflammasome activation might represent interacting pathways in patients with SA.</p

Association of differential mast cell activation with granulocytic inflammation in severe asthma

Rationale: mast cells (MCs) play a role in inflammation and both innate and adaptive immunity, but their involvement in severe asthma (SA) remains undefined. Objectives: we investigated the phenotypic characteristics of the U-BIOPRED (Unbiased Biomarkers for the Prediction of Respiratory Diseases Outcomes) asthma cohort by applying published MC activation signatures to the sputum cell transcriptome. Methods: eighty-four participants with SA, 20 with mild/moderate asthma (MMA), and 16 healthy participants without asthma were studied. We calculated enrichment scores (ESs) for nine MC activation signatures by asthma severity, sputum granulocyte status, and three previously defined sputum molecular phenotypes or transcriptome-associated clusters (TACs) 1, 2, and 3 using gene set variation analysis. Measurements and Main Results: MC signatures except unstimulated, repeated FceR1-stimulated and IFN-g–stimulated signatures were enriched in SA. A FceR1-IgE–stimulated and a single-cell signature from asthmatic bronchial biopsies were highly enriched in eosinophilic asthma and in the TAC1 molecular phenotype. Subjects with a high ES for these signatures had elevated sputum amounts of similar genes and pathways. IL-33– and LPS-stimulated MC signatures had greater ES in neutrophilic and mixed granulocytic asthma and in the TAC2 molecular phenotype. These subjects exhibited neutrophil, NF-kB (nuclear factor-kB), and IL-1b/TNF-a (tumor necrosis factor-a) pathway activation. The IFN-g–stimulated signature had the greatest ES in TAC2 and TAC3 that was associated with responses to viral infection. Similar results were obtained in an independent ADEPT (Airway Disease Endotyping for Personalized Therapeutics) asthma cohort. Conclusions: gene signatures of MC activation allow the detection of SA phenotypes and indicate that MCs can be induced to take on distinct transcriptional phenotypes associated with specific clinical phenotypes. IL-33–stimulated MC signature was associated with severe neutrophilic asthma, whereas IgE-activated MC was associated with an eosinophilic phenotype.</p