230 research outputs found

    A comparative study of a heat and fluid flow problem using three models of different levels of sophistication

    Get PDF
    AbstractThree mathematical models of different levels of sophistication have been used to study a practical problem on underground heat and fluid flow, associated with the seasonal storage of hot water in an aquifer. A number of scenarios have been examined using the three models. For the basic problem the three models yield similar results, so use of the simplest is preferred. For several variations on the problem, only the more complicated models are adequate to properly address the problem. In general, the choice of an appropriate model is very problem-specific and requires not only experience with modelling methods, but also an understanding of the physics of the problem

    Uncertainty in the Maximum Principal Stress Estimated from Hydraulic Fracturing Measurements Due to the Presence of the Induced Fracture

    Get PDF
    Abstract The classical theory for hydraulic fracturing stress measurements assumes an ideal case with a linear elastic, homogenous, and isotropic medium; and a fracture that reopens distinctly when the minimum tangential borehole stress is exceeded. The induced fracture disturbs this ideal picture in several aspects, which are important for the evaluation of the maximum horizontal principal stress using the fracture reopening pressure. This disturbance can be attributed to the fracture normal stiffness and the initial hydraulic fracture permeability. In this paper, the hydraulic fracturing reopening test is studied by coupled hydromechanical modeling that takes into account an induced fracture that is incompletely closed. The result shows that with realistic equipment compliance, the apparent fracture reopening evaluated from the well-pressure is close to the magnitude of the minimum horizontal principal stress with little or no correlation to the maximum horizontal principal stress. This observation suggests that determination of maximum principal stress by hydraulic fracturing using the reopening pressure is very uncertain

    Reply to Comments by Veling on “A Semi-Analytical Solution for Large-Scale Injection-Induced Pressure Perturbation and Leakage in a Laterally Bounded Aquifer–Aquitard System” by Zhou, Birkholzer, and Tsang

    Get PDF
    Veling (2010) pointed to 'a serious mistake' and 'mathematical inconsistency' in Zhou et al. (2009) because the dimensionless flow equations in Equation 4 (in terms of dimensionless hydraulic head rise in the aquifer and the aquitard) would give rise to additional terms when back converting to the groundwater flow equations, in the case that initial conditions for hydraulic head were spatially variable. He added, however, that the conclusions of the paper remain valid when uniform initial conditions are assumed. We accept this comment because we have indeed assumed uniform initial conditions in the system but failed to state this explicitly in the publication, partially because this assumption is very common in groundwater hydrology when deriving analytical and semi-analytical solutions. The same assumption was employed, for example, by Veling in Veling and Maas (2009), as stated 'For the ease of presentation we assume from here on that {phi}{sub i0} (r, z) ... are all equal to zero. An arbitrary initial function ... will complicate the solution, but not essentially'. We shall emphasize that with this assumption, our semi-analytical solutions and their derivations are correct
    corecore