24 research outputs found

    Simultaneous Transcriptional and Epigenomic Profiling from Specific Cell Types within Heterogeneous Tissues InĀ Vivo

    No full text
    Epigenomic mechanisms direct distinct gene expression programs for different cell types. Various inĀ vivo tissues have been subjected to epigenomic analysis; however, these studies have been limited by cellular heterogeneity, resulting in composite gene expression and epigenomic profiles. Here, we introduce ā€œNuTRAP,ā€ a transgenic mouse that allows simultaneous isolation of cell-type-specific translating mRNA and chromatin from complex tissues. Using NuTRAP, we successfully characterize gene expression and epigenomic states of various adipocyte populations inĀ vivo, revealing significant differences compared to either whole adipose tissue or inĀ vitro adipocyte cell lines. We find that chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) using NuTRAP is highly efficient, scalable, and robust with even limited cell input. We further demonstrate the general utility of NuTRAP by analyzing hepatocyte-specific epigenomic states. The NuTRAP mouse is a resource that provides a powerful system for cell-type-specific gene expression and epigenomic profiling

    Cocaine Responses Are Not a Circadian Output and <i>pdf</i> Mutants Show Wild-Type Cocaine Sensitivity

    No full text
    <div><p>(A) Cocaine responses do not vary with the circadian clock. Control <i>(EP1631)</i> flies were raised under LD conditions and assayed for cocaine phenotypes in the crackometer at the indicated Zeitgeber (ZT) times. One-way ANOVA revealed no significant effect of time of day (<i>F</i> = 0.53, <i>p</i> = 0.82, <i>n</i> = 32).</p> <p>(B) Flies lacking the neuropeptide PDF <i>(pdf<sup>01</sup>)</i> display normal cocaine sensitivity. <i>pdf<sup>01</sup></i> homozygotes <i>(pdf<sup>01</sup>/pdf<sup>01</sup>)</i> and <i>pdf<sup>01</sup></i> hemizygotes <i>(pdf<sup>01</sup>/Df)</i> showed wild-type responses to cocaine in the crackometer. Individual pairwise comparisons using Student's <i>t</i>-tests revealed no significant differences between control (+/+ and +/<i>Df</i>) and <i>pdf</i> mutant genotypes (<i>p</i> = 0.69, <i>p</i> = 0.97, <i>n</i> = 6ā€“8 experiments)</p></div

    Molecular Structure of the <i>Lmo</i> Locus

    No full text
    <div><p>(A) A genomic map of the <i>Lmo</i> locus. Three different first exons can be utilized, forming the basis for three alternative transcripts. Exon RA-1 is separated from the alternative start sites RB-1 and RC-1 by a large (āˆ¼30 kb) intron. <i>EP1306, EP1383,</i> and <i>pdrm</i> carry insertions 25, 73, and 91 bp, respectively, upstream of the exon RA-1 transcriptional start site. Arrows within the EP elements refer to the orientation of the insertion and the expected direction of inducible expression via UAS sites contained within the EP element. <i>Bx</i> alleles are insertions of natural transposons into the 3ā€² UTR of the <i>Lmo</i> gene that have been shown to stabilize <i>Lmo</i> transcript (<a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020408#pbio-0020408-Shoresh1" target="_blank">Shoresh et al. 1998</a>). Protein-coding exons are shaded.</p> <p>(B) Expression of the <i>Lmo</i> RA transcript is enriched in <i>Drosophila</i> heads, and is reduced in the <i>EP1306</i> mutant. RNA was isolated from heads and bodies; after cDNA synthesis, quantitative RT-PCR was performed using primers specific to the RA transcript of <i>Lmo</i> in addition to primers to a reference transcript, the ribosomal protein <i>rp49</i>. Relative abundance is expressed as fold increase over control <i>(EP1631)</i> body mRNA. No detectable amplification was seen in RNase-treated controls (data not shown). Error bars represent standard error of the mean. Asterisk denotes significant difference from control (Student's paired <i>t</i>-test assuming equal variance; <i>p <</i> 0.001, <i>n</i> = 3).</p></div

    <i>Lmo</i> Loss-of-Function Mutants Show Increased Sensitivity to Cocaine

    No full text
    <div><p>(A) Cocaine phenotypes of various <i>Lmo</i> mutants. Male flies hemizygous for the indicated <i>Lmo</i> alleles (and their appropriate genetic controls) were exposed to 150 Ī¼g of cocaine and tested in the crackometer as described in <a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020408#s4" target="_blank">Materials and Methods</a>. Compared to their control (Ctl-1), <i>EP1383</i> (<i>p <</i> 0.02) and <i>EP1306</i> (<i>p <</i> 0.001) flies show significantly increased sensitivity to cocaine. Similarly, compared to their respective controls, <i>pdrm</i> and <i>hdp</i> flies are significantly more sensitive to cocaine (<i>p <</i> 0.001). Asterisks denote significant differences from controls (Student's paired <i>t</i>-test assuming equal variance); <i>n</i> = 20 experiments.</p> <p>(B) Cocaine doseā€“response. <i>EP1306</i> flies (filled squares) and <i>pdrm</i> flies (filled circles) and their respective controls were exposed to the indicated doses of cocaine. At each dose, the responses of <i>EP1306</i> and <i>pdrm</i> flies are significantly higher than their controls (<i>p <</i> 0.001, <i>n</i> = 16ā€“20 experiments).</p> <p>(C) <i>EP1306</i> flies show alterations in cocaine-induced locomotor patterns of activity. Flies were exposed to 0, 75, or 100 Ī¼g of cocaine, as indicated, for 1 min. Representative traces shown correspond to 30 s of recorded activity of about ten flies starting 1 min after the end of cocaine exposure (<i>n</i> ā‰„ 4). Top panels show response of control flies to indicated amounts of cocaine; bottom panels show activity of <i>EP1306</i> flies after cocaine administration. Ctl-1 is <i>EP1631,</i> Ctl-2 is P[GAL4] line <i>8.142,</i> and Ctl-3 is <i>w<sup>1118</sup></i>.</p></div

    A Model for LN<sub>v</sub> and LMO Regulation of Cocaine Sensitivity

    No full text
    <div><p>(A) In wild type, LN<sub>v</sub>s modulate locomotor responses via electrical activity and synaptic transmission. We propose a model in which cocaine acts to directly increase LN<sub>v</sub> activity. Upon cocaine administration, synaptic DA concentrations are increased (via cocaine's inhibition of the plasma membrane DA transporter). Activation of presumed DA receptors on the LN<sub>v</sub> (dark arrowheads) stimulates electrical activity and subsequent synaptic output. This activity contributes to the behavioral response of the fly to cocaine.</p> <p>(B) LN<sub>v</sub> ablations eliminate LN<sub>v</sub> contribution to the cocaine response, reducing cocaine sensitivity.</p> <p>(C) In our model, <i>Lmo</i> loss-of-function mutants <i>(Lmo<sup>LOF</sup>),</i> which have increased cocaine sensitivity, have increased activity/output during the cocaine response. This increased activity may be mediated by increases in receptor content on the LN<sub>v</sub> or by recruitment of other LN<sub>v</sub>s that normally do not participate in the cocaine response.</p> <p>(D) <i>Lmo</i> gain-of-function mutants <i>(Lmo<sup>GOF</sup>)</i> mutants have reduced LN<sub>v</sub> output and reduced cocaine sensitivity. This could also result from a reduction in receptor density.</p></div

    <i>Lmo</i> Gain-of-Function <i>Bx</i> Alleles Show Reduced Sensitivity to Cocaine

    No full text
    <div><p>(A) Cocaine phenotypes of <i>Bx</i> mutants. Male flies hemizygous for <i>Bx</i> alleles <i>Bx<sup>1</sup></i> or <i>Bx<sup>J</sup></i> show significant reductions in sensitivity to cocaine compared to control (Ctl) flies (<i>p <</i> 0.001, <i>n</i> = 12 experiments). Asterisks denote significant differences from control (Student's paired <i>t</i>-test assuming equal variance).</p> <p>(B) Doseā€“response. <i>Bx<sup>J</sup></i> flies (filled circles) show reduced sensitivity compared to Ctl flies (open circles) at all doses tested (<i>p <</i> 0.001, <i>n</i> = 16ā€“20 for all doses except for 250 Ī¼g, where <i>p</i> = 0.0015, <i>n</i> = 8). Two additional <i>Bx</i> alleles (<i>Bx<sup>2</sup> and Bx<sup>3</sup></i>) had similar phenotypes to <i>Bx<sup>1</sup></i> (not shown).</p> <p>(C) <i>Bx<sup>J</sup></i> flies show alterations in cocaine-induced locomotor patterns of activity. Flies were exposed to 0, 100, or 125 Ī¼g of cocaine, as indicated, for 1 min. Representative traces shown are 30 s of recorded activity of about ten flies starting 30 or 60 s after the end of cocaine exposure (<i>n</i> ā‰„ 3). Top panels show response of control flies to indicated amounts of cocaine; bottom panels show activity of <i>Bx<sup>J</sup></i> flies after cocaine administration. Ctl flies are <i>w<sup>1118</sup></i>.</p></div
    corecore