11 research outputs found
The parabolic concentrating collector: A tutorial
A tutorial overview of point-focusing parabolic collectors is presented. Optical and thermal characteristics are discussed. Data representing typical achievable collector efficiencies are presented and the importance of balancing collector cost with concentrator quality is argued through the development of a figure of merit. Various types of two-axis tracking collectors are described. The Department of Energy program to develop these devices is briefly discussed, as are present and projected costs for these collectors
Compatibility and shielding analysis of science instruments in spacecraft containing a radioisotope thermoelectric generator
Compatibility and shielding analysis of science instruments in spacecraft containing radioisotope thermoelectric generato
Heat and electricity from the Sun using parabolic dish collector systems
Point focus distributed receiver solar thermal technology for the production of electric power and of industrial process heat is addressed. The thermal power systems project which emphasizes the development of cost effective systems which will accelerate the commercialization and industrialization of plants up to 10 MWe, using parabolic dish collectors is described. The projected size of the isolated load market in the 1990-2000 time period is 300 to 1000 MW/year. Although this market is small in comparison to the grid connected utility market, it is indicated that by assuming only a 20 percent market penetration, up to 10,000 power modules per year would be required to meet this need. At a production rate of 25,000 units/year and assuming no energy storage, levelized bus bar energy costs of 75 mills/kWeh are projected. These numbers are based on what is believed to be a conservative estimate regarding engine-generator conversion efficiency (40 percent) for the 1990 time period. With a more optimistic estimate of efficiency (i.e., 45 percent), the bus bar cost decreases to about 67 mills/kWeh. At very large production rates (400,000 modules/years), the costs decrease to 58 mills/kWeh. Finally, the present status of the technology development effort is discussed
Solar Thermal Power Systems parabolic dish project
The status of the Solar Thermal Power Systems Project for FY 1980 is summarized. Included is: a discussion of the project's goals, program structure, and progress in parabolic dish technology. Analyses and test results of concentrators, receivers, and power converters are discussed. Progress toward the objectives of technology feasibility, technology readiness, system feasibility, and system readiness are covered
Computational methodology to determine fluid related parameters on non regular three-dimensional scaffolds
The application of three-dimensional (3D) biomaterials
to facilitate the adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation
of cells has been widely studied for tissue engineering
purposes. The fabrication methods used to improve the
mechanical response of the scaffold produce complex and
non regular structures. Apart from the mechanical aspect, the
fluid behavior in the inner part of the scaffold should also be
considered. Parameters such as permeability (k) or wall shear
stress (WSS) are important aspects in the provision of
nutrients, the removal of metabolic waste products or the
mechanically-induced differentiation of cells attached in the
trabecular network of the scaffolds. Experimental measurements
of these parameters are not available in all labs.
However, fluid parameters should be known prior to other
types of experiments. The present work compares an
experimental study with a computational fluid dynamics
(CFD) methodology to determine the related fluid parameters
(k and WSS) of complex non regular poly(L-lactic acid)
scaffolds based only on the treatment of microphotographic
images obtained with a microCT (lCT). The CFD analysis
shows similar tendencies and results with low relative
difference compared to those of the experimental study, for
high flow rates. For low flow rates the accuracy of this
prediction reduces. The correlation between the computational
and experimental results validates the robustness of the
proposed methodology.The authors gratefully acknowledge research support from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation through research project DPI2010-20399-C04-01. The Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) through the CIBER initiative and the Platform for Biological Tissue Characterization of the Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red en Bioingenieria, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (CIBER-BBN) are also gratefully acknowledged.Acosta SantamarĂa, VA.; MalvĂ©, M.; Duizabo, A.; Mena Tobar, A.; Gallego Ferrer, G.; GarcĂa Aznar, J.; Doblare Castellano, M.... (2013). Computational methodology to determine fluid related parameters on non regular three-dimensional scaffolds. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 41(11):2367-2380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-013-0849-8S236723804111Acosta SantamarĂa, V., H. Deplaine, D. MariggiĂł, A. R. Villanueva-Molines, J. M. GarcĂa-Aznar, J. L. GĂłmez Ribelles, M. DoblarĂ©, G. Gallego Ferrer, and I. Ochoa. Influence of the macro and micro-porous structure on the mechanical behavior of poly(l-lactic acid) scaffolds. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 358(23):3141–3149, 2012.Adachi, T., Y. Osako, M. Tanaka, M. Hojo, and S. J. Hollister. Framework for optimal design of porous scaffold microstructure by computational simulation of bone regeneration. Biomaterials 27(21):3964–3972, 2006.Adamczyk, Z., and T. G. M. Vandeven. Deposition of particles under external forces in laminar-flow through parallel-plate and cylindrical channels. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 80(2):340–356, 1981.Alberich, B. A., D. Moratal, J. L. Escobar, J. C. RodrĂguez, A. VallĂ©s-Lluch, L. MartĂ-BonmatĂ, et al. Microcomputed tomography and microfinite element modeling for evaluating polymer scaffolds architecture and their mechanical properties. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 91B(1):191–202, 2009.Al-Munajjed, A., M. Hien, R. Kujat, J. P. Gleeson, and J. Hammer. Influence of pore size on tensile strength, permeability and porosity of hyaluronan-collagen scaffolds. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 19(8):2859–2864, 2008.Alves da Silva, M. L., A. Martins, A. R. Costa-Pinto, V. M. Correlo, P. Sol, M. Bhattacharya, S. Faria, R. L. Reis, and N. M. Neves. Chondrogenic differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in chitosan-based scaffolds using a flow-perfusion bioreactor. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 5(9):722–732, 2011.Ansys (2010) CFX Theory User Manual. Canonsburg, PA: Ansys Software.BrĂgido, R. D., J. M. EstellĂ©s, J. A. Sanz, J. M. GarcĂa-Aznar, and M. S. Sánchez. Polymer scaffolds with interconnected spherical pores and controlled architecture for tissue engineering: fabrication, mechanical properties, and finite element modeling. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 81B(2):448–455, 2007.Byrne, P. D., D. Lacroix, J. A. Planell, D. J. Kelly, and P. J. Prendergast. Simulation of tissue differentiation in a scaffold as a function of porosity, Young’s modulus and dissolution rate: application of mechanobiological models in tissue engineering. Biomaterials 28:5544–5554, 2007.Chor, M. V., and W. Li. A permeability measurement system for tissue engineering scaffolds. Meas. Sci. Technol. 18(1):208–216, 2007.Cozensroberts, C., J. A. Quinn, and D. A. Lauffenburger. Receptor-mediated adhesion phenomena—model studies with the radial-flow detachment assay. Biophys. J. 58(1):107–125, 1990.Davisson, T., R. L. Sah, and A. Ratcliffe. Perfusion increases cell content and matrix synthesis in chondrocyte three-dimensional cultures. Tissue Eng. 8(5):807–816, 2002.Deplaine, H., M. Lebourg, P. Ripalda, A. Vidaurre, P. Sanz-Ramos, G. Mora, F. PrĂłsper, I. Ochoa, M. DoblarĂ©, J. L. GĂłmez Ribelles, I. Izal-Azcárate, and G. Gallego Ferrer. Biomimetic hydroxyapatite coating on pore walls improves osteointegration of poly(l-lactic acid) scaffolds. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 101(1):173–186, 2013.Dias, M. R., P. R. Fernandes, J. M. Guedes, and S. J. Hollister. Permeability analysis of scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J. Biomech. 45(6):938–944, 2012.Freyman, T. M., I. V. Yannas, and L. J. Gibson. Cellular materials as porous scaffolds for tissue engineering. Prog. Mater Sci. 46:273–282, 2001.Gong, S., H. Wang, Q. Sun, S. T. Xue, and J. Wang. Mechanical properties and in vitro biocompatibility of porous zein scaffolds. Biomaterials 27(20):3793–3799, 2006.Gutierrez, R. A., and E. T. Crumpler. Potential effect of geometry on wall shear stress distribution across scaffold surfaces. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 36(1):77–85, 2008.Hammer, D. A., and D. Lauffenburger. A dynamic-model for receptor-mediated cell adhesion to surfaces. Biophys. J. 52(3):475–487, 1987.Ho, S. T., and D. W. Hutmacher. A comparison of micro CT with other techniques used in the characterization of scaffolds. Biomaterials 27(8):1362–1376, 2006.Ho, M. H., P. Y. Kuo, H. J. Hsieh, T. Y. Hsien, L. T. Hou, J. Y. Lai, and D. M. Wang. Preparation of porous scaffolds by using freeze-extraction and freeze-gelation methods. Biomaterials 25(1):129–138, 2004.Hutmacher, D. W., J. T. Schantz, C. X. Lam, K. C. Tan, and T. C. Lim. State of the art and future directions of scaffold-based bone engineering from a biomaterials perspective. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 1(4):245–260, 2007.Izal, I., P. Aranda, P. Sanz-Ramos, P. Ripalda, G. Mora, F. Granero-MoltĂł, H. Deplaine, J. L. GĂłmez-Ribelles, G. G. Ferrer, V. Acosta, I. Ochoa, J. M. GarcĂa-Aznar, E. J. Andreu, M. MonleĂłn-Pradas, M. DoblarĂ©, and F. PrĂłsper. Culture of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells on of poly(l-lactic acid) scaffolds: potential application for the tissue engineering of cartilage. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc., 2012.Kapur, S., D. J. Baylink, and K. H. Lau. Fluid flow shear stress stimulates human osteoblast proliferation and differentiation through multiple interacting and competing signal transduction pathways. Bone 32(3):241–251, 2003.Karande, T. S., J. L. Ong, and C. M. Agrawal. Diffusion in musculoskeletal tissue engineering scaffolds: design issues related to porosity, permeability, architecture, and nutrient mixing. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 32(12):1728–1743, 2004.Kelly, D. J., and P. J. Prendergast. Mechano-regulation of stem cell differentiation and tissue regeneration in osteochondral defects. J. Biomech. 38(7):1413–1422, 2005.Kreke, M. R., L. A. Sharp, Y. W. Lee, and A. S. Goldstein. Effect of intermittent shear stress on mechanotransductive signaling and osteoblastic differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells. Tissue Eng. Part A 14(4):529–537, 2008.Lacroix, D., A. Chateau, M. P. Ginebra, and J. A. Planell. Micro-finite element models of bone tissue-engineering scaffolds. Biomaterials 27(30):5326–5334, 2006.Lacroix, D., and P. J. Prendergast. A mechano-regulation model for tissue differentiation during fracture healing: analysis of gap size and loading. J. Biomech. 35(9):1163–1171, 2002.Li, S., J. R. De Wijn, J. Li, P. Layrolle, and K. De Groot. Macroporous biphasic calcium phosphate scaffold with high permeability/porosity ratio. Tissue Eng. 9:535–548, 2003.Melchels, F. P. W., B. Tonnarelli, A. L. Olivares, I. Martin, D. Lacroix, J. Feijen, et al. The influence of the scaffold design on the distribution of adhering cells after perfusion cell seeding. Biomaterials 32(11):2878–2884, 2011.O’Brien, F. J., B. A. Harley, M. A. Waller, I. Yannas, L. J. Gibson, and P. Prendergast. The effect of pore size on permeability and cell attachment in collagen scaffolds for tissue engineering. Technol. Health Care 15(1):3–17, 2007.Ochoa, I., J. A. Sanz, J. M. Garcia-Aznar, M. Doblare, D. M. Yunos, and A. R. Boccaccini. Permeability evaluation of 45S5 bioglass-based scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J. Biomech. 42:257–260, 2009.Porter, B., R. Zauel, H. Stockman, R. Guldberg, and D. Fyhrie. 3-D computational modeling of media flow through scaffolds in a perfusion bioreactor. Mater. Res. 38:543–549, 2005.Sandino, C., S. Checa, P. J. Prendergast, and D. Lacroix. Simulation of angiogenesis and cell differentiation in a CaP scaffold subjected to compressive strains using a lattice modeling approach. Biomaterials 31(8):2446–2452, 2010.Sanz, J. A., J. M. GarcĂa-Aznar, and M. DoblarĂ©. On scaffold designing for bone regeneration: a computational multiscale approach. Acta Biomater. 5(1):219–229, 2009.Sanz, J. A., C. Kasper, M. van Griensven, J. M. Garcia-Aznar, I. Ochoa, and M. Doblare. Mechanical and flow characterization of Sponceram® carriers: evaluation by homogenization theory and experimental validation. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 87B(1):42–48, 2008.Singh, H., S. H. Teoh, H. T. Low, and D. W. Hutmacher. Flow modelling within a scaffold under the influence of uni-axial and bi-axial bioreactor rotation. J. Biotechnol. 119:181–196, 2005.Sjollema, J., and H. J. Busscher. Deposition of polystyrene latex-particles toward polymethylmethacrylate in a parallel plate flow cell. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 132(2):382–394, 1989.Truscello, S., G. Kerckhofs, S. Van Bael, G. Pyka, J. Schrooten, and H. Van Oosterwyck. Prediction of permeability of regular scaffolds for skeletal tissue engineering: a combined computational and experimental study. Acta Biomater. 8(4):1648–1658, 2012.Woodfield, T. B., J. Malda, J. Wijn, F. PĂ©ters, J. Riesle, and C. A. van Blitterswijk. Design of porous scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering using a three-dimensional fiber-deposition technique. Biomaterials 25(18):4149–4161, 2004