Between Protection and Participation : Moral promises and perils in pediatric clinical research

This thesis aims to contribute to the optimal inclusion of children in pediatric clinical research in such a way that we can further clinical research to advance scientific knowledge and develop much-needed treatment options for children while protecting children against harm from research. Why do children and parents want to participate (or not)? What are their motivations and what is important to them in their decision? What expectations do they have of participation? Answers to these questions are indispensable in order to incorporate their views into the pediatric research enterprise and tailor the process of recruitment and informed consent to their needs and perspectives. When we know why children and parents consent or dissent to research and what elements they use in their decision, we know what they attach importance to in their decision. From this data, we learn which information they want and need to make a valid informed decision. This information helps us to increase both the moral and instrumental value of informed consent in pediatric clinical research; we obtain more informed consent and probably more informed consent. The main research aims of this thesis are as follows: 1. To explore children’s and their parents’ motivations, views and expectations during recruitment and informed consent processes in pediatric clinical research. 2. To analyze these motivations, views and expectations and the factors that shape them from an ethical and legal perspective. 3. To develop a normative framework to support research professionals in the ethically sound inclusion of children in pediatric clinical research. This framework tailors the proc

Between Protection and Participation : Moral promises and perils in pediatric clinical research

This thesis aims to contribute to the optimal inclusion of children in pediatric clinical research in such a way that we can further clinical research to advance scientific knowledge and develop much-needed treatment options for children while protecting children against harm from research. Why do children and parents want to participate (or not)? What are their motivations and what is important to them in their decision? What expectations do they have of participation? Answers to these questions are indispensable in order to incorporate their views into the pediatric research enterprise and tailor the process of recruitment and informed consent to their needs and perspectives. When we know why children and parents consent or dissent to research and what elements they use in their decision, we know what they attach importance to in their decision. From this data, we learn which information they want and need to make a valid informed decision. This information helps us to increase both the moral and instrumental value of informed consent in pediatric clinical research; we obtain more informed consent and probably more informed consent. The main research aims of this thesis are as follows: 1. To explore children’s and their parents’ motivations, views and expectations during recruitment and informed consent processes in pediatric clinical research. 2. To analyze these motivations, views and expectations and the factors that shape them from an ethical and legal perspective. 3. To develop a normative framework to support research professionals in the ethically sound inclusion of children in pediatric clinical research. This framework tailors the process of recruitment and informed consent to the perspective and the needs of children and their parents, who have the key role in decisions on research participation

Psychological, behavioral and social effects of disclosing Alzheimer's disease biomarkers to research participants

BACKGROUND: Current Alzheimer's disease (AD) research initiatives focus on cognitively healthy individuals with biomarkers that are associated with the development of AD. It is unclear whether biomarker results should be returned to research participants and what the psychological, behavioral and social effects of disclosure are. This systematic review therefore examines the psychological, behavioral and social effects of disclosing genetic and nongenetic AD-related biomarkers to cognitively healthy research participants. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search in eight scientific databases. Three independent reviewers screened the identified records and selected relevant articles. Results extracted from the included articles were aggregated and presented per effect group. RESULTS: Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the data synthesis. None of the identified studies examined the effects of disclosing nongenetic biomarkers. All studies but one concerned the disclosure of APOE genotype and were conducted in the USA. Study populations consisted largely of cognitively healthy first-degree relatives of AD patients. In this group, disclosure of an increased risk was not associated with anxiety, depression or changes in perceived risk in relation to family history. Disclosure of an increased risk did lead to an increase in specific test-related distress levels, health-related behavior changes and long-term care insurance uptake and possibly diminished memory functioning. CONCLUSION: In cognitively healthy research participants with a first-degree relative with AD, disclosure of APOE ε4-positivity does not lead to elevated anxiety and depression levels, but does increase test-related distress and results in behavior changes concerning insurance and health. We did not find studies reporting the effects of disclosing nongenetic biomarkers and only one study included people without a family history of AD. Empirical studies on the effects of disclosing nongenetic biomarkers and of disclosure to persons without a family history of AD are urgently needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO international prospective register for systematic reviews CRD42016035388 . Registered 19 February 2016

Views on Early Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease among Dutch Physicians: A Qualitative Interview Study

Background: Hope for future treatments to prevent or slow down dementia motivates researchers to strive for ever-earlier diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (AD) based on biomarkers, even before symptoms occur. But is a biomarker-based early diagnosis desirable in clinical practice? Objective: This study explores the ethical considerations that shape current clinical practice regarding early AD diagnostics and the use of biomarkers. Methods: In this qualitative study, Dutch physicians were interviewed. Topics included physicians' views concerning early AD diagnosis in persons with no or mild cognitive impairment, physicians' considerations regarding current and expected future practices of early AD diagnosis, the use of biomarkers, and the use of the concepts preclinical and prodromal AD. We analyzed the transcripts using direc

Prevention in the age of personal responsibility: Epigenetic risk-predictive screening for female cancers as a case study

Epigenetic markers could potentially be used for risk assessment in risk-stratified population-based cancer screening programmes. Whereas current screening programmes generally aim to detect existing cancer, epigenetic markers could be used to provide risk estimates for not-yet-existing cancers. Epigenetic risk-predictive tests may thus allow for new opportunities for risk assessment for developing cancer in the future. Since epigenetic changes are presumed to be modifiable, preventive measures, such as lifestyle modification, could be used to reduce the risk of cancer. Moreover, epigenetic markers might be used to monitor the response to risk-reducing interventions. In this article, we address ethical concerns related to personal responsibility raised by epigenetic risk-predictive tests in cancer population screening. Will individuals increasingly be held responsible for their health, that is, will they be held accountable for bad health outcomes? Will they be blamed or subject to moral sanctions? We will illustrate these ethical concerns by means of a Europe-wide research programme that develops an epigenetic risk-predictive test for female cancers. Subsequently, we investigate when we can hold someone responsible for her actions. We argue that the standard conception of personal responsibility does not provide an appropriate framework to address these concerns. A different, prospective account of responsibility meets part of our concerns, that is, concerns about inequality of opportunities, but does not meet all our concerns about personal responsibility. We argue that even if someone is responsible on grounds of a negative and/or prospective account of responsibility, there may be moral and practical reasons to abstain from moral sanctions

Four-Gene Pan-African Blood Signature Predicts Progression to Tuberculosis

Rationale: Contacts of patients with tuberculosis (TB) constitute an important target population for preventive measures because they are at high risk of infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis and progression to disease.Objectives: We investigated biosignatures with predictive ability for incident TB.Methods: In a case-control study nested within the Grand Challenges 6-74 longitudinal HIV-negative African cohort of exposed household contacts, we employed RNA sequencing, PCR, and the pair ratio algorithm in a training/test set approach. Overall, 79 progressors who developed TB between 3 and 24 months after diagnosis of index case and 328 matched nonprogressors who remained healthy during 24 months of follow-up were investigated.Measurements and Main Results: A four-transcript signature derived from samples in a South African and Gambian training set predicted progression up to two years before onset of disease in blinded test set samples from South Africa, the Gambia, and Ethiopia with little population-associated variability, and it was also validated in an external cohort of South African adolescents with latent M. tuberculosis infection. By contrast, published diagnostic or prognostic TB signatures were predicted in samples from some but not all three countries, indicating site-specific variability. Post hoc meta-analysis identified a single gene pair, C1QC/TRAV27 (complement C1q C-chain / T-cell receptor-α variable gene 27) that would consistently predict TB progression in household contacts from multiple African sites but not in infected adolescents without known recent exposure events.Conclusions: Collectively, we developed a simple whole blood-based PCR test to predict TB in recently exposed household contacts from diverse African populations. This test has potential for implementation in national TB contact investigation programs

Four-gene pan-African blood signature predicts progression to tuberculosis

Rationale: Contacts of patients with tuberculosis (TB) constitute an important target population for preventive measures because they are at high risk of infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis and progression to disease. Objectives: We investigated biosignatures with predictive ability for incident TB. Methods: In a case–control study nested within the Grand Challenges 6-74 longitudinal HIV-negative African cohort of exposed household contacts, we employed RNA sequencing, PCR, and the pair ratio algorithm in a training/test set approach. Overall, 79 progressors who developed TB between 3 and 24 months after diagnosis of index case and 328 matched nonprogressors who remained healthy during 24 months of follow-up were investigated. Measurements and Main Results: A four-transcript signature derived from samples in a South African and Gambian training set predicted progression up to two years before onset of disease in blinded test set samples from South Africa, the Gambia, and Ethiopia with little population-associated variability, and it was also validated in an external cohort of South African adolescents with latent M. tuberculosis infection. By contrast, published diagnostic or prognostic TB signatures were predicted in samples from some but not all three countries, indicating site-specific variability. Post hoc meta-analysis identified a single gene pair, C1QC/TRAV27 (complement C1q C-chain / T-cell receptor-α variable gene 27) that would consistently predict TB progression in household contacts from multiple African sites but not in infected adolescents without known recent exposure events. Conclusions: Collectively, we developed a simple whole blood–based PCR test to predict TB in recently exposed household contacts from diverse African populations. This test has potential for implementation in national TB contact investigation programs