Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries: from pathophysiology to therapeutic strategies

: Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is a heterogeneous group of clinical entities characterized by clinical evidence of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with normal or near-normal coronary arteries on coronary angiography (stenosis < 50%) and without an over the alternative diagnosis for the acute presentation. Its prevalence ranges from 6% to 11% among all patients with AMI, with a predominance of young, nonwhite females with fewer traditional risks than those with an obstructive coronary artery disease (MI-CAD). MINOCA can be due to either epicardial causes such as rupture or fissuring of unstable nonobstructive atherosclerotic plaque, coronary artery spasm, spontaneous coronary dissection and cardioembolism in-situ or microvascular causes. Besides, also type-2 AMI due to supply-demand mismatch and Takotsubo syndrome must be considered as a possible MINOCA cause. Because of the complex etiology and a limited amount of evidence, there is still some confusion around the management and treatment of these patients. Therefore, the key focus of this condition is to identify the underlying individual mechanisms to achieve patient-specific treatments. Clinical history, electrocardiogram, echocardiography, and coronary angiography represent the first-level diagnostic investigations, but coronary imaging with intravascular ultrasound and optical coherent tomography, coronary physiology testing, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging offer additional information to understand the underlying cause of MINOCA. Although the prognosis is slightly better compared with MI-CAD patients, MINOCA is not always benign and depends on the etiopathology. This review analyzes all possible pathophysiological mechanisms that could lead to MINOCA and provides the most specific and appropriate therapeutic approach in each scenario

A review of methods for assessment of coronary microvascular disease in both clinical and experimental settings

Obstructive disease of the large coronary arteries is the prominent cause for angina pectoris. However, angina may also occur in the absence of significant coronary atherosclerosis or coronary artery spasm, especially in women. Myocardial ischaemia in these patients is often associated with abnormalities of the coronary microcirculation and may thus represent a manifestation of coronary microvascular disease (CMD). Elucidation of the role of the microvasculature in the genesis of myocardial ischaemia and cardiac damage—in the presence or absence of obstructive coronary atherosclerosis—will certainly result in more rational diagnostic and therapeutic interventions for patients with ischaemic heart disease. Specifically targeted research based on improved assessment modalities is needed to improve the diagnosis of CMD and to translate current molecular, cellular, and physiological knowledge into new therapeutic option

Perspectives in noninvasive imaging for chronic coronary syndromes

Both the latest European guidelines on chronic coronary syndromes and the American guidelines on chest pain have underlined the importance of noninvasive imaging to select patients to be referred to invasive angiography. Nevertheless, although coronary stenosis has long been considered the main determinant of inducible ischemia and symptoms, growing evidence has demonstrated the importance of other underlying mechanisms (e.g., vasospasm, microvascular disease, energetic inefficiency). The search for a pathophysiology-driven treatment of these patients has therefore emerged as an important objective of multimodality imaging, integrating "anatomical" and "functional" information. We here provide an up-to-date guide for the choice and the interpretation of the currently available noninvasive anatomical and/or functional tests, focusing on emerging techniques (e.g., coronary flow velocity reserve, stress-cardiac magnetic resonance, hybrid imaging, functional-coronary computed tomography angiography, etc.), which could provide deeper pathophysiological insights to refine diagnostic and therapeutic pathways in the next future

Association of beta‐blocker treatment with mortality following myocardial infarction in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and heart failure or left ventricular dysfunction: a propensity matched‐cohort analysis from the High‐Risk Myocardial Infarction Database Initiative

Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/136247/1/ejhf647.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/136247/2/ejhf647_am.pd

The acquired immune response to the mucosal adjuvant LTK63 imprints the mouse lung with a protective signature

Abstract LTK63, a nontoxic mutant of Escherichia coli heat labile enterotoxin (LT), is a potent and safe mucosal adjuvant that has also been shown to confer generic protection to several respiratory pathogens. To understand the mechanisms of action underlying the LTK63 protective effect, we analyzed the molecular and cellular events triggered by its administration in vivo. We show here that LTK63 intrapulmonary administration induced in the mouse lung a specific gene expression signature characterized by the up-regulation of cell cycle genes, several host defense genes, chemokines, chemokine receptors, and immune cell-associated genes. Such a transcriptional profile reflected the activation of alveolar macrophages and the recruitment to the lung of T and B cells and innate immune cells such as granulocytes, NK, and dendritic cells. All of these events were T cell dependent and specific for LTK63 because they were absent in SCID and nude mice. Additionally, we showed that LTK63 induces a potent adaptive immune response against itself directed to the lung. We propose that acquired response to LTK63 is the driving force for the local recruitment of both adaptive and innate immune cells. Our data suggest that LTK63 acts as an airway infection mimic that establishes a generic protective environment limiting respiratory infection by innate immune mechanisms and by improving adaptive responses to invading pathogens.</jats:p